Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We knew this was coming.
1 posted on 11/09/2011 8:18:17 AM PST by Driftwood1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Driftwood1

It’s his history: Vote: Present.


2 posted on 11/09/2011 8:21:08 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1

What a back bencher! Leading from his rear again, I see.


3 posted on 11/09/2011 8:28:28 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1

Delaying the Keystone XL pipeline expansions means we buy more oil from OPEC.


4 posted on 11/09/2011 8:32:20 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1

No. Delay it until it dies. Just like he delayed oil development in the Gulf of Mexico until most of the drilling rigs had left for foreign opportunities.

This pipeline is already to go. But they can’t afford to KEEP it ready to go. The supplies and the workers will all go elsewhere. What, they’re going to sit there on their hands, and on expensive supplies, for a whole year and then risk having even further delays if the wrong people get elected again? Cowardly RINOs have proved just as bad as Communist Democrats in the past.

So, China will end up getting this oil, just like they’re getting the oil off of Cuba while we sit on our hands down there, too.


5 posted on 11/09/2011 8:37:01 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1

Hey all of you unemployed...look at Obama and his stalling of 50,000 jobs any of you could have....I honestly think this is an issue the republicans could beat him with....ask “why President Obama are you stallion on something that could really create real jobs?”


7 posted on 11/09/2011 8:44:35 AM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1

OIL SHIPPED BY TRAIN INSTEAD.

Meanwhile, oil is being shipped from N. Dakota and Canada by rail. The increase in freight care loadings with crude oil is unprecedented in modern times. This much crude oil has not been shipped by train since the days of John Rockefeller.

Much if not most of the oil is being shipped on the Burlington Northern the majority of which is owned by none other than Warren Buffet. Do you think there is any connection here?

A train wreck of oil carrying freight cars in a unit train would be a disaster of proportions to make a pipeline leak look like mere child’s play. Train wrecks have no safety shut-off valves and they also create lots of sparks. Trains run through the heart of most populated areas, their traditional routes to serve populations for transportation. Pipelines, on the other hand, seldom transit population centers, the righ-of-way is just too expensive so they instead stick to less expensive and less populated areas.

Stranded oil is commanding a freight rate of $14 to $15 per barrell... an incredible profit margin for freight trains.


9 posted on 11/09/2011 8:50:11 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1

When enviros get pitted against the average Joe trying to survive (i.e. ‘social justice’) they lose EVERY TIME.

Best tactic we got in our arsenal.


10 posted on 11/09/2011 8:54:17 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1; All
Prediction:

Hussein will put this pipeline proposal into a piece of horsecrap legislation. The Republicans will not pass said legislation, then Hussein and the media will decry how the Republicans are blocking energy independence.

The fact that Hussein could have approved this months ago will NEVER be reported.

11 posted on 11/09/2011 8:55:09 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1
...by requiring sponsors to reduce the project’s environmental risks....

What? the safest method of transporting oil isn't safe enough?

(expletive deleted)!

12 posted on 11/09/2011 8:57:29 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1
Deciding against this project, or delaying until it's too late - either way, this will be one of Obama's worst acts as president and it's consequences will hurt us long after he's left office.


16 posted on 11/09/2011 9:30:21 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Driftwood1
"Pipeline delay would give Obama political cover on Keystone"

One of the few things that Obama could do to help his reelection is to agree to sign the OK on the Keystone pipe line. The resulting jobs and economic activity are one of the few things that could impact the national unemployment rate immediately.

Therefore, I am glad that Obama will stand in the way, the next President will sign it and start a snowball effect of creating more jobs, a LOT more jobs!

18 posted on 11/09/2011 10:56:25 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson