Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Fires Back at 'Overbroad' Subpoena on Solyndra Documents (Obama's scared)
Fox News ^ | 11/4/2011 | fox news

Posted on 11/04/2011 1:39:14 PM PDT by tobyhill

The White House on Friday all but refused to turn over the documents House Republicans have subpoenaed on bankrupt solar firm Solyndra, firing off a letter saying the request would put an "unreasonable burden on the president's ability to meet his constitutional duties."

The feisty response appears to set up a clash between congressional investigators and the White House over the sprawling probe into Solyndra's finances and the administration's involvement in the decision to provide the struggling company a $528 million loan with taxpayer money.

White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler, in her letter, scolded GOP lawmakers for demanding more documents, noting the Obama administration has already turned over 85,000 pages of documents in the course of their investigation. Without explicitly refusing to comply with the subpoena, Ruemmler repeatedly described the order as "overbroad."

"The Committee's extremely broad request for documents -- now a subpoena -- is a significant intrusion on Executive Branch interests," she wrote, saying she can only conclude the subpoena was "driven more by partisan politics than a legitimate effort to conduct a responsible investigation."

Though the White House has turned over thousands of documents, Republicans say the administration has not provided everything they've requested. The House Energy and Commerce Committee voted Thursday to subpoena, and the subpoenas went out late Thursday to the White House and office of the vice president.

"Unfortunately, we had to take this step after the White House has continued to slow walk the production of documents necessary for this investigation by only releasing selected documents and records," Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., chairman of the House panel investigating the matter, said in a statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Now the White House is saying it's Obama's Constitutional Duty to blow taxpayer's money.
1 posted on 11/04/2011 1:39:19 PM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Unfortunately it looks as if this is headed for the black hole of a Separation of Powers dispute.

Nothing Congress can do about it except pursue impeachment....and we all know THAT ain’t happening!


2 posted on 11/04/2011 1:40:51 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
the request would put an "unreasonable burden on the president's ability to meet his constitutional duties."

Translation: "It's cutting into my time for golf, pickup basketball, listening to hip hop, watching TV, and fundraising. Besides, it's your job to cooperate with me, not mine to cooperate with you!"

3 posted on 11/04/2011 1:46:32 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
"unreasonable burden on the president's ability to meet his constitutional duties."

That means it must disrupt his tee times and fundraising trips.

4 posted on 11/04/2011 1:46:56 PM PDT by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

If Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon had a love child....


5 posted on 11/04/2011 1:47:10 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
"unreasonable burden on the president's ability to meet his constitutional duties."

They mean the president's ability to meet his tee off time or the president's ability to meet his plane for the vacation trip.

6 posted on 11/04/2011 1:47:47 PM PDT by Lockbox (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Time for the military to kick in the doors on Obama’s hidey-hole...


7 posted on 11/04/2011 1:49:51 PM PDT by moovova (Report my sarcastic, fear-mongering, hate-filled lies to www.AttackWatch.com by clicking HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I must disagree with your “translation”. Mine is:
“It would put an unreasonable burden on my effort to hide from the American public what the hell is going on behind the scenes.”
Imagine if this “answer” was given by an (R) President to a (D) Congress. 15.7 on the 10 point Richter scale.


8 posted on 11/04/2011 1:50:29 PM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf (NY TIMES: "We print the news as it fits our views")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
the request would put an "unreasonable burden on the president's ability to meet his constitutional duties."

His constitutional duty is to turn them over. There is nothing top secret to give up. It is illegal to NOT turn them over.

9 posted on 11/04/2011 1:51:01 PM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Where the hell is that 500 million BARRY!!! IT’S OUR MONEY!!!


10 posted on 11/04/2011 1:52:18 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Stop Government Greed Now!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Fine. Contempt Of Congress!


11 posted on 11/04/2011 1:52:32 PM PDT by IL1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

“a significant intrusion on Executive Branch interests”

Ah, good, old-fashioned Executive Privilege. Popularly associated with Nixon, its origins are probably as deep as the Republic itself. But in its current form it goes back to Truman and his newfangled Cold War National Security State. It never did have much to do with national security, or if it did those instances never became famous. Mostly, it’s used to do just what it says, maintain the executive’s privileges. And why would he want to give those up? We all loves our perks.


12 posted on 11/04/2011 1:53:24 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
-—85,000 pages already turned over.....geeze, how many more pages are there? 85,000 pages is just simply amazing and shows of how corrupt 0pany and company are.

How many pages were shredded? How long does it take to read 85,000 pages? 85,000 pages is about 2,800 reams of paper. That's enough paper to fill my house.

Dang, just the paper and printing cost along is way too expensive. 0pansy and is ilk are out of control.

13 posted on 11/04/2011 1:56:48 PM PDT by redshawk (0pansy is a Liar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
"....president's ability to meet his constitutional duties."

Hahahahaha. Since Zer0 is clearly NOT a NBC, he could easily handle his responsibilities and resign.

14 posted on 11/04/2011 1:59:58 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


15 posted on 11/04/2011 2:07:39 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The SCOTUS bitch slapped Clintoon time and again when they tried to avoid providing docs over his many scandals.


16 posted on 11/04/2011 2:16:34 PM PDT by Feckless (I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

In Obama’s opinion, the US Treasury is just his re-election campaign stash. If you can’t use taxpayer money to win friends and buy votes, what’s the point of being President anyway?


17 posted on 11/04/2011 2:20:11 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The Republicans need to take the offense without fear of being called names. They need to state to the people of this Nation that enough is enough of wasting our tax dollars on this green crap in which one after another, after another of these Obama DOE backed, taxpayer funded green pipe dream companies goes belly up. Start kickin butt, and kick especially the environmentalcases square in their....double them over. Make them know we aren’t going to sit back and take their BS anymore.

The Congress, the House is there to look after our interests, actually the whole damned government is there for the express purpose of looking out for our interests, therefore there is no reason the House cannot get belligerant with Obama whose proven himself a worthy target of belligerance.


18 posted on 11/04/2011 2:25:43 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
...Republicans need to take the offense...

HaHaHaHaHa...I don't care who you are, that thar' is funny!

The ONLY republican with a pair is Michele Bachmann and they've already Alinski'ed her. He will never turn over a meaningful document - never.

19 posted on 11/04/2011 2:35:47 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Can we send a drone after a hostile leader on foreign soil - even if he is ours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

SCOTUS here we come............................


20 posted on 11/04/2011 2:36:46 PM PDT by Red Badger (Obama's number one economics advisor must be a Magic Eight Ball.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson