Posted on 09/14/2011 6:46:47 PM PDT by Carling
Curious. It's been two entire days now, and I haven't seen or heard from Sarah Palin on FoxNews explain how she knew something was wrong as far back as 2007.
Yeah, whatever.
Why yes it would.
Gee, I don't know. Perhaps because she is a member of the media who made a baseless claim against an announced GOP candidate for President.
Her paid job is to be a member of the media. Last I knew, media members were supposed to investigate matters and offer proof before smearing public figures.
Does she have a public appearance scheduled for that day? I can’t imagine that she would announce without giving speech, but I could be wrong.
You weren't paying attention. Sarah said she thought a governmental body mandating Gardasil was wrong. That was in 2007.
NOW it comes out that there were:
a) many contributions from Merck to Perry ( admittedly not exactly a smoking gun, though interestingly Merck contributed nothing to Governor Palin), and
b) a link from Perry--->his C.O.S. gets hired by Merck--->then Merck gets unusual special deal from Perry, violating his own stated principles.
a) and b) were NOT what Sarah was referencing when she mentioned 2007, she was addressing the mandating issue.
Baseless? Facts have been posted all over FR yet you remain in denial. Why not go read Dio’s link instead of posting obsessive threads, McGinnis.
I wonder why certain posters aren't starting their posts with "I love Sarah, I really do, but ..." any more.
Without those lead in words of previous bed-rock support for Gov. Palin, the follow-on descriptions of why they can't support her just don't have the same impact.
I always look for those words in posts because then I know I can fully trust what follows them.
THOSE ARE BASELESS FACTS!!!! /s
As FReeper after FReeper has shown you, PerryBOT,
the claim is NOT Baseless.
But the claim exposed baseless RINO behavior by
the RINO Rick.
Why don’t you just ignore the posts with the data
and have another beer?
It’s about Gardasil, or whatever else the Palinistas think they can hurt Perry with. It’s a tough news cycle. Then it’s over. Perry has had this $hit thrown at him for ten years and always comes out smelling like a rose. Palin, on the other hand, got $hit thrown at her and bailed. Now she rides around in a bus paid for by people who have misplaced faith in her that she’s going to ride in and “save” something, throwing rocks from the edge of the debate, and losing support by the day. All while legitimate candidates are fighting for us, and all capable of flattening Obama. That’s what it’s about.
Why thank you. You see this old man here is a little thick at times. :)
I think she’s intentionally messing with your head, Carling. You must have pissed her off with your rants. Ooops...
Funny post from the supporter of a part time governor who promised his electorate he would not be running for president.
A $5,000 campaign contribution buys and pays for a candidate? DAMN! I’m gonna buy myself one. Who needs to be president when you can buy one for that cheap? I pay more than that in school taxes. Bet if I bought a politician I could get that bill cancelled! You are so smart, Cajun.
I’m with you entirely.
(But I can’t prove it.)
.
.
.
The second part is a private joke.
As Mark Steyn says, “Everything before the BUT is Bull. “
Damn you. Now everybody knows. LOLOLOL!!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.