Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judges weaken rules on paedophiles
telegraph.co.uk ^ | 08/21/2011 | David Barrett

Posted on 08/21/2011 10:15:10 AM PDT by massmike

Paedophiles have won unsupervised access to their own children because it would breach their human rights to keep them apart, judges have ruled.

They ruled that the "right to a family life" must be taken into account before the "sexual offences prevention orders", known as SOPOs, are issued.

The ruling, issued after a legal challenge by a group of men convicted of using the internet to view child pornography, significantly weakens the ability of the criminal courts to place restrictions on paedophiles. It means judges cannot impose blanket bans on men and women convicted of child sex offences spending time with their own children because they breach the right to a "family life".

The development comes amid a review by ministers of the way the Human Rights Act has had a "chilling effect" on British law.

The judges said total bans on surfing the internet and coming into contact with teenagers aged between 16 and 18 cannot be imposed after a paedophile has been found guilty.

Last night the ruling was described as "very worrying" by MPs.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: childpornography; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; pedophiles; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 08/21/2011 10:15:15 AM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike; little jeremiah

homosexual agenda ping


2 posted on 08/21/2011 10:16:20 AM PDT by massmike (Massachusetts:Stopped hanging witches;started electing Kennedys.Coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
The judges said total bans on surfing the internet

Have to agree with this part. Totally impracticable and unenforceable. In any case one can barely find a job these days without using the internet in some fashion. In my hometown in LA every one of 25 jobs I had applied to even years ago said "sorry no applications here, apply online".

3 posted on 08/21/2011 10:23:00 AM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer9

impracticable=impractical

(ugh, when is the owner going to pony up an edit button?!)


4 posted on 08/21/2011 10:24:43 AM PDT by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Satan must be crowing like a randy rooster! May God be with us! Our country is being destroyed by such evil because we have turned from Him, and obey Him not. There can be no America without our gracious and loving God! When will the people confess their sins and change their evil ways? Only if we unite in supplication to Him will he withdraw His justifiable wrath from our country!


5 posted on 08/21/2011 10:26:16 AM PDT by Paperdoll (NO MORE RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer9

Too bad...that’s the price you pay when you bugger children...

The penalty should be summery execution on the spot.


6 posted on 08/21/2011 10:29:25 AM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Lop it off. You don’t need it to be a father to your children you already have, problem solved.


7 posted on 08/21/2011 10:29:35 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

America is getting there.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2765974/posts

“Liberty Counsel Action’s Matt Barber attended the conference and says he felt he was on a different planet, as the presenting professionals aimed to remove pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,” (DSM). That would mean that pedophilia would no longer be considered a mental disorder.

“The entire focus of the event was on the victimhood of the pedophile,” Barber accounts. There was “very little concern for the children who are the victims of these individuals when they are raped, who these individuals lust after.”


8 posted on 08/21/2011 10:31:00 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

What about the human rights of the children?


9 posted on 08/21/2011 10:37:26 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

I love the way the Brits spell “pedophiles”.

The strange vowel combination makes the creepiness factor skyrocket.


10 posted on 08/21/2011 10:39:42 AM PDT by GatorGirl (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

“Lop it off.”

Actually, an orchiectomy would serve a better purpose. No more semen, no more children, no more testosterone, no more violence and no more sexual desire.


11 posted on 08/21/2011 10:45:56 AM PDT by bukkdems (Polygamy is the essential ingredient of Islamic evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl

Paeofiles.... offences.. etc


12 posted on 08/21/2011 10:47:01 AM PDT by goseminoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bukkdems
Actually, an orchiectomy would serve a better purpose. No more semen, no more children, no more testosterone, no more violence and no more sexual desire.

A bullet to the brain works for me.

13 posted on 08/21/2011 10:47:06 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Crim
The penalty should be summery execution on the spot.

Even a wintery one would be fine with me.

14 posted on 08/21/2011 11:04:53 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Crim
The penalty should be summery execution on the spot.

Did you mean summary execution?

...or execution in a summery spot, like maybe, Cancun.

: /

15 posted on 08/21/2011 11:05:19 AM PDT by LoveUSA (You don't notice the night light until it gets dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Crim

>>Too bad...that’s the price you pay when you bugger children...<<

I agree with your sentiment, but I do not believe that is what these people were convicted of. Simply having the pictures on your computer is not the same as buggering children any more than a married man having a subscription to playboy is having an affair.

Crimes really do have varying degrees. And, frankly, we are on such a hair trigger on this stuff, legally, that is is very possible to nail a guy who never, EVER intended to view or store any pictures of naked kids. There have been articles about it posted right here on FR.


16 posted on 08/21/2011 11:05:44 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: massmike

The push of the homosexual movement is the removal of all sexual morality. Anal sex normalization makes every sex act normal....nothing can be evil or dysfunctional by that “logic” if anal sex can be normalized, which they are forcing in school curricula with the sodomite Jerry Brown.

They are forcing our children through MTV and school curricula to think homosexual acts are normal and good. (Heather has Two Mommies (biological lie). It is bizarre and illogical and nihilism. Teaching such silly nonsense, that you have to act on any urges no matter how destructive, is cognitive dissonance and cultural Marxism at its finest.

That means all sexual acts are equal....even pederasty. There can be no “good and evil” “right or wrong” with a standard which says homosexual sex is “good” and normal. What is their standard? Lucifer? It is certainly not God’s standard of “right and wrong”. Is it Joe, the molester’s standard? Of course!

How can parents allow Joe’s standards to be taught in public school? (Get your kids out of those immoral indoctrination centers!)

Just like in Ancient Greece.....it is a time when women were second class citizens and only used for reproduction. They had slaves. Children were the objects of lust.

They are trying to return us to their utopian pagan society of Ancient Greece.


17 posted on 08/21/2011 11:08:25 AM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Looks like the UK continues to lead the West into the Abyss of Destruction that Marx desired so much.

Related threads.

Academic conference seeks to normalize pedophilia (Baltimore)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2764616/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2763883/posts

UK judge to teacher: ‘I don’t criticize you’ for sexual attraction to two-year-olds
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2759005/posts

Fashion industry outraged after French label launches lingerie for girls as young as FOUR
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2765558/posts

Shock after Dutch priest endorses pedophilia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2723525/posts

Corey Feldman: Biggest Problem in Hollywood is Pedophilia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2763842/posts

Rationalizing Pedophilia in Islam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2762732/posts


18 posted on 08/21/2011 11:29:38 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

I think maybe if all of those judges were found emasculated, you would find fewer such rulings.


19 posted on 08/21/2011 12:07:12 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (http://www.durban3nyc.com/. Go there and learn what those who seek to destroy Israel are up to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

“I agree with your sentiment, but I do not believe that is what these people were convicted of. Simply having the pictures on your computer is not the same as buggering children any more than a married man having a subscription to playboy is having an affair.”

People who are sexually attracted to children are the same as adult men who like to look at hooters?

Really?


20 posted on 08/21/2011 12:39:51 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson