WikiLeaks Exposes North American Integration Plot

New American ^ | Monday, 02 May 2011 21:00 | Alex Newman

[haroldeveryman]

Here’s a link to the Counsel on Foreign Relations Task Force charged with “Building a North American Community”

http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102#author

The article was written in 2005. Just a few years later, with our economy a shambles, our implicit open borders policy turning into a disaster, and our basic freedoms under constant attack, their perspective seems naive.

And all those American jobs that went to Baja California have ended up in China anyway, just a few years later.

[kearnyirish2]

Most (if not all) of California was Spanish; those Spanish names go all the way up the state. I believe Oregon & Washington were claimed by Britain.

[Buckeye McFrog]

And Julian richly deserves that. But I’m still glad this info got leaked.

The impending Greek default and implosion of the EU may actually do more to prevent this however.

[Ramius]

Uh guys...? It’s New American... please consider the source.

[mamelukesabre]

I don’t see the benefit to even a progressive globalist in including those peon countries.

[af_vet_rr]

Bush was responsible for much of it gaining traction under the guise of "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and things like Perry's Trans-Texas Corridor were going to make up the North American Super Corridor which was going to link everything.

The bad thing is, this kind of stuff, whether the TTC or the SSP, was going on in plain sight. We thought it was dead with Bush's administration winding down, but Obama appears to be resuscitating it under a different name.

Unfortunately, the conspiracy nuts like Ron Paul and Alex Jones take discussion of this to the extreme and so normal people are reluctant to even look into it, but it's been happening. There was a reason why Bush dragged his feet on securing our southern border.

Texans' fight against Perry's corridor is going to be more important over the coming years than people now realize.

[af_vet_rr]

Uh guys...? It’s New American... please consider the source.

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America stuff did exist, and Perry's Trans-Texas Corridor is still rearing its ugly head even this month, although it's because they are trying to finally put an end to it.

Just because the conspiracy nuts had latched on to it and blown it up into some kind of United Nations taking over the US thing doesn't meant there wasn't a kernel of truth to some of it.

[Ramius]

Well, sure. SPP existed and there’s been plans for a spiffy new highway in Texas. OK... but neither has anything to do with any sort of unification of the governments of North America. This is just the John Birch Society doing their nutty thing... they’re the original conspiracy theorists. Heck, they were into conspiracies way before conspiracies were cool.

[af_vet_rr]

Well, sure. SPP existed and there’s been plans for a spiffy new highway in Texas. OK... but neither has anything to do with any sort of unification of the governments of North America.

That's why I said it wasn't quite as extreme as the crazy UN taking over everything nuts, but the SPP, the corridor stuff, that is all there to really open things up. Having a unified transportation system running from central Mexico up into Canada was very important for these people. If you listen to Rick Perry's speeches concerning his corridor and if you look at the people and national representatives who were meeting, it was really worrisome. It's really hard not to fall into tinfoil territory with some of this stuff.

[bronxville]

I thought perhaps that Obama was to bring it home, and if reelected will do it as he’s got no loyalty to our Constitution or Soverneignty and they’ll put forward their own candidates like they did last time. It’s up to us to tell them this time that we’re onto their game. I know for myself that I’ll never vote for another McCain - period - who just might be Perry.

[muawiyah]

Finley, Ramsey and Foster (and a few others) were fur trappers in California way back then. They ended up involved in what was really the Alaskan fur trade when they began transporting Russian fur from their settlement at Fort Ross to the Spanish mission at San Francisco.

Americans were not in active conflict with Rome and Moscow, but "they" were in sufficient dispute that only a neutral intermediary could ship Spanish vegetables to the Russians to take to their people in Alaska.

California was just coming out of a good 500 years of truly deplorable weather so settlement was difficult and did not grow much outside of the mission system. The Inland areas were being settled slowly by American traders, trappers and adventurers.

The Russians had moved out by the time the California Republic was declared ending Mexican claims. The Brits didn't have much of a claim on California ~ although they claimed what is now roughly Oregon, Washington and BC, but that's the PAC NW and not really qualified to be called CA.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

I’ll take “Texas Governors” for a thousand, Alex.

[muawiyah]

The driver behind the Super Corridor, etc. projects is a simple fact ~ the United States has already USED UP all the West Coast locations where suitible modern container ports can be built.

Mexico, on the other hand, OWNS BAJA, which, by itself, can probably handle several ports with huge capacity, and it owns their own West Coast facing the Baja East Coast, and that area is underdeveloped and has a good number of sites where good ports can be built.

The rail and highway connections to that part of Mexico (Baja and the West Coast of the mainland) are intended to provide a new point of break of bulk for container shipments somewhere in the MidWest ~ Indianapolis is one proposed location, and I69 is NOW UNDER CONSTRUCTION and will be built with funds provided by the leasing of the Tristate tollroad. The beltway around Indianapolis is also being improved with DOZENS of quite larger interchanges. They already had the largest confluence of interstate highways in America, and in a couple of years they should have one of the best highway infrastructures ever built in the history of the world. They'll be able to handle the container traffic when it arrives.

When it comes to the East Coast we have the same story ~ there's nowhere else to put ports ~ and given the size of our economy, the amount of stuff we normally ship out, and the amount we import, we will need more ports.

Mexico, next door, has the sites. Of note they also have whales, so as this develops anyway you'll hear more and more from the "DON'T NUKE THE WHALES" crowd.

All in all it's a pretty decent idea. You might thank the Lord that he put so much of our necessary suitible harbors in Mexico rather than in California or South Carolina and Florida!

[muawiyah]

The Spanish mission system ends at San Francisco.

One of the things I found visiting a number of the missions and reading their history is that they were provisioned with goods manufactured in ASIA, not EUROPE.

Spain's colony called the Philippines played a serious part in developing the West Coast. For the most part it was inaccessible from the part now called Mexico.

[muawiyah]

Bananas man, it’s the bananas.

[editor-surveyor]

>> “it was bush the elder that initiated NAFTA...” <<

.
NAFTA was just a re-naming of it.

The Birch Society had papers on this in 1958, and Henry Lamb has also been fighting this since the ‘50s.

[editor-surveyor]

>> “The Spanish mission system ends at San Francisco” <<

.
No, actually there were two more north of SF in Sonoma county but they never got to construct large campuses before California became a state and changed the politics.

[Chode]

as much as i am against uniting the US and Canada, that's one thing,

hooking up with that giant whorehouse south of the border, well...

[editor-surveyor]

>> “Well, sure. SPP existed...” <<

.
Get educated: http://sovereignty.net/

[bronxville]

Thanks editor. That’s what I thought but didn’t have time to do the research. I will reiterate, that I’ve found that in nummerous things, the Unconstitutional and non-Sovereignity plans they didn’t get finished, is passed onto the next president. Clinton and Carter are still around doing touchups. Nixon was used post-presidency to continue his China deals and so on...