Posted on 05/12/2011 4:52:16 AM PDT by Kaslin
Trust me, when it comes to the 2012 race for the Republican presidential nomination, I am going to be fair in assessing the candidates. Already I have polled for NewsMax, and my early polls placed former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich in fourth place among announced or potential candidates.
But before I go into my harsh analyst mode -- which once in a while leads to an "I'm hurt" email from Newt -- let me share my personal feelings about the man who has just announced that he will seek the presidency.
Other than the man most call my "other father," former U.S. Sen. Mack Mattingly, no political figure in my adult life has been as close to me or had more moments of importance in my life than Newt Gingrich. For over 33 years, we have laughed and cried together, argued incessantly, shared countless moments of happiness, known each other's family members, and run campaigns together. And after all that, I'm still constantly amazed at the new facets of Newt's life and politics that continue to surface.
But one thing I do know about Newt: Never underestimate him.
I still remember one day in 1980. We had just eaten lunch during a busy day of working on his re-election campaign for Congress. Newt asked me what my ultimate ambition was in politics. I'm sure my answer was something that would read embarrassingly grand if I recalled it today. But when I turned the tables and asked Newt what he planned to achieve, he said without missing a beat that he aspired to be speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives.
At that time, no Republican in my lifetime had ever served as speaker. I thought he was nuts.
I was wrong. And little did I know that I would have an inside, front-row view of that dream as it unfolded. Looking back, it was all worth it -- the many hours in cars, on planes, in meetings, pleading for money, battling for votes, fighting recounts.
So now my friend begins the voyage for the presidency. It will be an uphill climb. Mitt Romney has a full campaign team in place from his 2008 run. Potential candidate Donald Trump could self-finance his early campaign. Mike Huckabee, should he enter the race, starts out, based on the polls, as the frontrunner. Sarah Palin has a huge following, as does the often-overlooked Ron Paul.
Then there are the new faces, Tim Pawlenty, Herman Cain and Mitch Daniels -- the favorite of the "Bush team."
And even if Gingrich wins the nomination, he must face an incumbent president whose fortunes appear to be on the rise. President Obama displayed decisive leadership and considerable political savvy in ordering the commando raid that, in essence, "executed" Osama bin Laden.
Still, the latest bad news on housing and the overall unemployment figures suggest that Barack Obama is vulnerable.
As for Newt, we all know his plusses and minuses. All agree he is brilliant.
He must harness his desire to address every new issue and every new policy solution, and instead stick to the message that half of the current GOP electorate was too young to pay attention to in the mid-1990s: his accomplishments as speaker.
It is a fact that Gingrich went toe-to-toe with then-President Clinton to force a reduction in the deficit and balanced budgets. He also successfully pressured Clinton to embrace a cut in the capital gains tax and to approve welfare reform.
Yes, I have heard about Newt's "political baggage" -- endlessly. But compared to someone like Donald Trump, whom I find to be a far more serious candidate than most pundits do -- Newt's personal history seems to pale in comparison. And polling confirms that no one really cares about ancient mistakes and misery.
Trust me, I will bust Newt in a minute if he makes a mistake. I've done it privately with him for years. We have had many a knockdown fight in our many years of friendship. So, he will get no free passes from this point forward.
But for a moment, imagine a skinny, overly ambitious kid working with a fairly slender Newt, our eyes both open and optimistic, and our whole lives ahead of us. I would have no heart and soul if I did not feel a special sense of pride in Gingrich's announcement Wednesday night.
Win or lose, Gingrich is owed much by the Republican Party. He is also owed much by me.
Good luck, old friend. I'll see you on the other side of the 2012 presidential race, whatever it may bring.
F—k Newt...
Another RINO throws his hat into the ring.
Did he deliver it from a bench with Pelosi? Thanks for your previous service Newt, but no thanks.
Nope.
Ain’t voting for another RINO.
Two “trust me’s” and a Newt endorsement = Maalox moment.
This is all you need to know about Matt Towery, who is the Atlanta RINO media darling when the DinoMedia wants so-called Republican face in front of the camera.
Newt has become just another delusional RINO fool.
Oh God, here we go with the Republican party “owes” a candidate something.
Did the Democrats go with a candidate owed something from the past? Had anybody even heard of Obamer before the last election? What about Bill Clinton...did anybody much know this guy before his New England victories?
If it’s a losing strategy, the Republicans, count on it, will embrace it.
Count on it, if Obama wins this next election it’s the end of this country. For with a TWICE mandate, the liberals will overturn everything, and with the wind at their backs.
Meanwhile the opposition party is nominating has-beens.
I am reminded of Dole and McCain. And now Gingrich.
How’d that Scozzafava thing turn out, Newt?
So long as it keeps him off the street and out of Nancy Pelosi campaign commercials, whatever, Newt.
The Newster long ago expended any political capital he accrued during the Contract with America era.
I’m so incredibly excited. The savior of the republic threw his hat in the ring. We’re saved!!!! (do i even need the /s tag?)
We need the RETREAD who gave us NAFTA, WTO and Bill Clinton's second term.
Yeah, that's what we need.
I believe Newt knows he has no chance of actually winning but this is another way to raise the profile of “brand Newt” and keep those lucrative speaking fees coming in.
Damn straight.
No, he isn't.
I read a comparison of Newt and Bill Clinton that sticks in my mind: two guys, both articulate and good debaters, both absorbed with the minutiae of public policy, both with women problems, and both poor managers.
Also sticking in my mind is Newt’s proclivity to find common cause with some of the worst characters inside the Beltway, e.g. Pelosi.
He will liven the debates during the primaries but he is badly flawed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.