Posted on 04/26/2011 6:05:25 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Of all the inexplicable Beltway media fetishes, none is more bizarre than the undying love affair with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).
So there he was, yet again, on a Sunday morning talk show, pretending to be relevant in a world that has long since passed him by.
And how could any right-thinking (in the most nonpartisan sense) person take him seriously? The topic this Sunday, on CNNs State of the Union program, was Libya, and specifically, how imperative it was for the U.S. to more forcefully engage in yet another expensive war. If we have a stalemate, I think its very possible al Qaeda may take advantage, he said. Hed just returned from Libya, where he met with the rebel leadership and decided, after a few hours, that they were true and pure and wanted nothing more than a Western-style democracy.
Trust his instincts! Remember, this is the same guy who claimed by putting her on his presidential ticket that Sarah Palin was qualified to be president.
Granted, McCain is never happier than when putting our troops in harms way. After all, he ran on leaving our troops in Iraq for 10,000 years. But thats not what made his latest warmongering so patently ridiculous. Rather, it was a little bit of history that glowing media accounts of his Libya trip have curiously omitted.
Less than two years ago in mid-August of 2009 McCain led a delegation of U.S. senators to Libya and met with Moammar Gadhafi. As he Twittered at the time, it was all fantastic: Late evening with Col. Qadhafi at his ranch in Libya interesting meeting with an interesting man. Video of the meeting shows McCain actually bowing to Gadhafi.
Libya state media treated the visit as a propaganda coup, reporting at the time: Sen. McCain and the delegation with him expressed their deep happiness to meet the leader and praised him for his wisdom and strategic vision to tackle issues of concern to the world and his efforts to sustain peace and stability in Africa.
But worst of all was the content of the meeting, with McCain offering Gadhafis regime military aid.
Yes. Military aid.
Now, asked about Gadhafi on CBSs Early Show, McCain replied, This is a man with American blood on his hands who has committed acts of terror in the past. And our policy, the United Statess policy, as articulated by the president of the United States, is that he should go he should not stay in power.
Asked by a Fox News anchor what would happen after Gadhafi was ousted, McCain dismissively replied, Well, I dont think we worried too much when we wanted to get rid of Hitler as to who would take his place.
Would McCain have offered Hitler military aid? Would McCain have bowed to Hitler? Why did he bow to this terrorist? Would McCain have waxed poetic on Twitter about how interesting Hitler was?
And given Gadhafis assumed ties to terrorism, why did McCain visit with promises of U.S. military aid? Why did he bow to someone with American blood on his hands?
Fact is, his 2009 visit to Libya was a gimmick, and his soiree there last week was as well. His entire shtick is nothing but gimmick after gimmick, devoid of any serious thought or expression of fundamental values. Hes irrelevant in his own party, a dinosaur in the era of Tea Party Republicans.
The out-of-touch Beltway media just never got the memo.
Moulitsas is the founder of Daily Kos.
Trying to be relevant after his performance as designated loser is pathetic.
You mean all that reaching across the aisle, Gang of Whatever, and bipartisanship didn’t score him any points with the Left? But this can’t be!
Libya is so yesterday’s war.
On to Damascus!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.