Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Conservatives Should Oppose Efforts To Defund Planned Parenthood (Full Page WSJ ad)
Wall Street Journal | 4/4/11 | Richard M. Scaife

Posted on 04/04/2011 7:11:52 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

"An Open Letter to Fellow Conservatives"

The Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives--urged on by conservatives opposed to abortion--has voted to defund Planned Parenthood. On this issue, Republicans and conservatives are dead wrong.

My grandmother was a friend and supporter of Margaret Sanger, one of America's earliest, most effective advocates of birth control.

I met Sanger several times before her death in 1966 and was impressed b y her intellect and her commitment to many issues, not the least of which was enabling every woman to be "the absolute mistress of her own body" as she put it.

I didn't agree with everything the formidable Mrs. Sanger espoused. Yet I respected her dedication to making health-care and birth-control services available to all Americans, especially to those with low incomes, no insurance and no other recourse to medicall services.

And I admired her fearless, relentless readiness to stand up for what she believed, despite decades of angry, mean-sprited, often hypocritical attacks on her ideas and her character.

So I am aggravatged by the continuing attacks on Sanger and her primary legacy, the Planned Parenthood network that still serves so many Americans today.

Now the Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives--urged on by conservatives opposed to abortion--has voted to defund Planned Parenthood.

On this issue, Republicans and conservatives are dead wrong.

Abortions are a minor aspect of Planned Parenthood's mission to provide reproductive health care, education, and other services to Americans, regardless of income.

More than 90 percent of its work focuses on preventive care, including preventing unintended pregnancies that often lead to unwanted, neglected and abused children.

In Pittsburgh and across America, Planned Parenthood offices help people to make better decisions about whether to have children. They help to arrance adoptions for women or couples unable to raise a child but unwilling to end a pregnancy.

Many of their clients are poor Americans who cannot afford birth-control measures that can cost $50 a month or more.

Of the 10,000 to 12,000 people who use local Planned Parenthood services, about 20 percent are teenagers, half are ages 20 to 30 and the rest are older than 30.

Of course, no one wants tenneagers to get pregnant. Yet far too many do--and they need reliable, honest advice about what to do next. For many of them, Planned Parenthood is the only reliable source of that advices. For many others, Planned Parenthood is the only safe, reliable source of counseling to avoid getting pregnant in the first places.

If not for Maragaret Sanger's vision and bravery, many poor Americans would have no place to turn for birth-control measures and counseling or for other health-care services.

To take that away makes on sense.

Dick Scaife

(Mr. Scaife is chairman of Trib Total Meida Inc., parent company of hte Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and its family of publications. Note: this op-ed was originally published in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review)

Paid for by Republicans for Planned Parenthood, a project of Planned Parenthood Federation of America.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; dickscaife; margaretsanger; moralabsolutes; notconservative; plannedparenthood; prolife; richardscaife; sanger; scaife; wallstreetjournal; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: SoFloFreeper

I’ve noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born. ~Ronald Reagan, quoted in New York Times, 22 September 1980


21 posted on 04/04/2011 7:31:03 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne
The real story of Margaret Sanger, whom he lauds (calling into question his rationality) has not been told in any broad sense. She was a eugenicist, a racist and a Nazi sympathizer. An absolutely murderous villain and elitist.

Pretty much says it all. The woman was pure evil

22 posted on 04/04/2011 7:31:26 AM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"An Open Letter to Fellow Conservatives"

When a person has to tell me they're a 'fellow conservative' I doubt. Same with 'this won't hurt' or 'you can trust me'. When the person IS, when it really won't hurt, when you can truth - IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE SAID.

23 posted on 04/04/2011 7:31:35 AM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php - It's only uncivil when someone on the right does it.- Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"many poor Americans"

He's speaking in code. What he's saying is, "We've got to stop those blacks and Hispanics from outbreeding us whites."
24 posted on 04/04/2011 7:31:52 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I always suspected that Scaife and Godzillary were in cahoots during that whole Clinton/Lewinsky farce.


25 posted on 04/04/2011 7:33:51 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump!


26 posted on 04/04/2011 7:40:29 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Unbelievable...people should research Sanger and listen or read her speeches...the woman was no different than a Nazi. She worshiped eugenics...evil...evil..person.

What an achievement more than 50 million dead because of her!

What is it with these left progressives...they just aren’t happy until millions die especially the helpless!

Look at Rachael Carson...ban DDT and kill millions in Africa...but that isn’t racism?


27 posted on 04/04/2011 7:43:32 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

This is not a hard decision.

The ruling class “elites” in DC are spending $1.5T a year more than they bring in, $5,000 per man, woman, and child in our country. Even if you ignore the evil of taking our money by force and using it to kill the innocent, we cannot afford to do everything “nice” that someone in our country wants our federal government to do. For the sake of the children that liberals permit to survive, we need to cut the federal budget back to the essentials.

Even those who think the world needs more dead babies should be objective enough to see that the taxpayers can’t afford to kill as many of our children as they want to kill. We need to scale back the federal government to only those enumerated powers in the Constitution, and killing the next generation doesn’t make the list. If Scaife wants more dead infants, he needs to pay for that himself, not with money that our (living) children will eventually have to repay.


28 posted on 04/04/2011 7:45:52 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Abortions are a minor aspect of Planned Parenthood's mission to provide reproductive health care, education, and other services to Americans, regardless of income.

Yeah, and that one little murder should be cancelled out by all the good that Mr._____ did. Is that the logic?

That "minor" aspect is what all the controversy is about.

29 posted on 04/04/2011 7:54:11 AM PDT by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I guess Scaife believes that black babies are "human weeds?"
30 posted on 04/04/2011 7:55:34 AM PDT by eCSMaster (2012 - End of an error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"Margaret Sanger"

The same Margaret Sanger who pushed for and received legislation allowing for the forced sterilization of "undesirables?" The same Margaret Sanger who hated black people? The same Margaret Sanger who wanted to only allow certain "desirable" persons to breed? The same Margaret Sanger who pushed for the forced abortion of "undesirable" children? The same Margaret Sanger whose writings appear below:

On blacks, immigrants and indigents:

"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people.

On sterilization & racial purification:

Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial "purification," couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.

On the right of married couples to bear children:

Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her "Plan for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932

On the purpose of birth control:

The purpose in promoting birth control was "to create a race of thoroughbreds," she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)

On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:

"More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12

On religious convictions regarding sex outside of marriage:

"This book aims to answer the needs expressed in thousands on thousands of letters to me in the solution of marriage problems... Knowledge of sex truths frankly and plainly presented cannot possibly injure healthy, normal, young minds. Concealment, suppression, futile attempts to veil the unveilable - these work injury, as they seldom succeed and only render those who indulge in them ridiculous. For myself, I have full confidence in the cleanliness, the open-mindedness, the promise of the younger generation." Margaret Sanger, Happiness in Marriage (Bretano's, New York, 1927)

On the extermination of blacks:

"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population," she said, "if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon

On respecting the rights of the mentally ill:

In her "Plan for Peace," Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication of those she deemed "feebleminded." Among the steps included in her evil scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization; segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. Birth Control Review, April 1932, p. 107

On adultery:

A woman's physical satisfaction was more important than any marriage vow, Sanger believed. Birth Control in America, p. 11

On marital sex:
"The marriage bed is the most degenerating influence in the social order," Sanger said. (p. 23) [Quite the opposite of God's view on the matter: "Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled; but whoremongers and adulterers God will judge." (Hebrews 13:4)

On abortion:
"Criminal' abortions arise from a perverted sex relationship under the stress of economic necessity, and their greatest frequency is among married women." The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.

On the YMCA and YWCA:
"...brothels of the Spirit and morgues of Freedom!", The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.

On the Catholic Church's view of contraception:
"...enforce SUBJUGATION by TURNING WOMAN INTO A MERE INCUBATOR." The Woman Rebel - No Gods, No Masters, May 1914, Vol. 1, No. 3.

On motherhood:
"I cannot refrain from saying that women must come to recognize there is some function of womanhood other than being a child-bearing machine." What Every Girl Should Know, by Margaret Sanger (Max Maisel, Publisher, 1915) [Jesus said: "Daughters of Jerusalem, weep... for your children. For, behold, the days are coming, in which they shall say, Blessed (happy) are the barren, and the wombs that never bear, and the breasts which never gave suck." (Luke 23:24)]

"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)

31 posted on 04/04/2011 8:00:13 AM PDT by ronnyquest (I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of freedom only to see fascism elected at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


32 posted on 04/04/2011 8:10:19 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnyquest

She was extremely disturbed.


33 posted on 04/04/2011 8:16:01 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Yep, same guy.
34 posted on 04/04/2011 8:16:30 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chesley

They’re simply lying about the percentages of “care” that they provide. It’s all in how it’s measured and what they count as an allocation of resources.

It’s probably closer to the truth that the percentages are reversed - 10% “other”, 90% abortions.


35 posted on 04/04/2011 8:19:26 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MrB; chesley; BykrBayb; trisham; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; EternalVigilance; xzins; P-Marlowe
They’re simply lying about the percentages of “care” that they provide. It’s all in how it’s measured and what they count as an allocation of resources.

It’s probably closer to the truth that the percentages are reversed - 10% “other”, 90% abortions.

Planned Parenthood alone murders approximately ONE THOUSAND INNOCENT AMERICANS EACH DAY, I really don't give a damn what percentage of their business that is.

This is like arguing that the Nazis should have been supported because great highways were more important than murdered Jews.

36 posted on 04/04/2011 8:28:14 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone; wagglebee
nowhere in the constitution is the federal government given the power to regulate abortions.

Nowhere in the constitution is the federal government given the power to tell one citizen they can arbitrarily murder another citizen and call it a "right."

therefore by default it is a states rights issue.....defund it

No, its a human rights issue. Both the federal and state governments have a duty and obligation to defend and protect innocent human life. Therefore, innocent human life should be protected at both the federal and the state level.

37 posted on 04/04/2011 8:30:09 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Doesn’t matter if it was just 1%, or 0.001%, abortions.

A murder is a murder, and why should my tax dollars go to support murderers?


38 posted on 04/04/2011 8:33:15 AM PDT by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
A great essay by Michael Crichton about Margaret Sanger and the Eugenics Movement

Why Politicized Science is Dangerous

39 posted on 04/04/2011 8:39:28 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

At one time, I seriously considered subscribing to Richard M. Scaife’s Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, because our local Johnstown Tribune Democrat newspaper is such a pathetic excuse for journalistism. However, given this piece of demonic propaganda, I’ll never spend a dime supporting any Trib Total Media Inc. owned business.

Do Quinn and Rose broadcast on a station owned by Trib Total Media Inc. ?!?


40 posted on 04/04/2011 8:39:38 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson