Skip to comments.
S.32 -- Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act
Congress ^
| Jan 25
| Lautenberg
Posted on 03/29/2011 7:41:29 PM PDT by DBrow
S.32 -- Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act (Introduced in Senate - IS)
S 32 IS
112th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 32To prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011
Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. KERRY, Mr. REED, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act'.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.
(a) Definition- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following:
`(30) The term `large capacity ammunition feeding device'--
`(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but
`(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.'.
(b) Prohibitions- Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:
`(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
`(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.
`(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
`(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--
`(A) a manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);
`(B) a transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;
`(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement; or
`(D) a manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.'.
(c) Penalties- Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:
`(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.'.
(d) Identification Markings- Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: `A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.'.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; bloodoftyrants; democrats; donttreadonme; guncontrol; highcapmags; liberalfascism; liberals; progressives; rapeofliberty; shallnotbeinfringed; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Lautenberg's normal-size mag ban. Gee, it looks like each link of an M60 belt would be a high-capacity feeding device!
And somehow this will "help" to prevent crimes, like the Arizona attempted assasination.
1
posted on
03/29/2011 7:41:32 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: DBrow
These emboldened obambi rats have a short memory. Not even Nancy Piglosi would allow talk of new gun control for the last few years.
2
posted on
03/29/2011 7:45:38 PM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
To: kbennkc
Maybe it’s just for fundraising.
3
posted on
03/29/2011 7:46:21 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: DBrow
Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. KERRY, Mr. REED, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. DURBIN)
Yep, the usual suspects. The good thing is, that even Harry Reid isn't dumb enough to let this ever come to vote, let alone any chance of it seeing the light of day in the house.
4
posted on
03/29/2011 7:46:41 PM PDT
by
apillar
To: DBrow
Does that ban include the cops?
FU lautenberg
5
posted on
03/29/2011 7:49:46 PM PDT
by
mylife
To: apillar
Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. KERRY, Mr. REED, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. DURBIN)Tyrants, true enemies of state.
6
posted on
03/29/2011 7:50:26 PM PDT
by
umgud
To: apillar
The good thing is, that even Harry Reid isn't dumb enough to let this ever come to vote...Don't be so sure, the NRA (under pressure from members) did not endorse him last election.
7
posted on
03/29/2011 7:51:39 PM PDT
by
ConservaTexan
(February 6, 1911)
To: mylife
--
Does that ban include the cops? --
Nope. On or off duty, LEO of all sorts are exempt. Some pigs are more equal than others.
8
posted on
03/29/2011 7:55:55 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: DBrow
Yeah, I'll be first in line to turn my hi-cap mags in.
NOT! We had a flag here in Texas back in our Republic days:
Dipchits.
9
posted on
03/29/2011 7:56:36 PM PDT
by
West Texas Chuck
(Why yes, I do speak Spanglish - "Hasta la later on, amigo. Pardon, would you have any salsa verde?")
To: DBrow
You never can tell when you might NEED some hi-cap magazines!
I lifted this from a 1984 copy of PISTOLERO MAGAZINE. Remember them?
10
posted on
03/29/2011 7:56:52 PM PDT
by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(Visit the TOMMY FRANKS MILITARY MUSEUM in HOBART, OK. I did, well worth it!)
To: Cboldt
Hmmmm...
That there seems to override the intent of the 2nd amendment.
11
posted on
03/29/2011 8:00:39 PM PDT
by
mylife
To: Cboldt
I dont worry about military.
They LOVE the constitution
12
posted on
03/29/2011 8:02:13 PM PDT
by
mylife
To: DBrow
Can we give back the bullets first?
13
posted on
03/29/2011 8:03:26 PM PDT
by
MtnClimber
(Osama and Obama both have friends that bombed the Pentagon.)
To: DBrow
NEVER trust a rat to have your best interest at heart or any Republican either .
That being said when politicians don’t trust you to be as well armed as their praetorian guard you need to start worrying .
That is the lesson of the bloody mass grave that was the 20th century . Make your decisions from info you have gotten for yourself instead of stuff that has been deliberately spoon fed to the MSM.
14
posted on
03/29/2011 8:05:08 PM PDT
by
Nebr FAL owner
(.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
To: MtnClimber
Now, now- the Left wants US to improve the tone! lol
15
posted on
03/29/2011 8:11:19 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: apillar
16
posted on
03/29/2011 8:17:41 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(The Democrat Party is Communist. The Republican Party is Socialist. The Tea Party is Capitalist.)
To: DBrow
This guy, Lautenberg is like a case of herpes... just won’t go away.
To: The Magical Mischief Tour
He’ll eventually get voted out. Once we get picture ID for voting, he’ll be gone.
18
posted on
03/29/2011 8:21:02 PM PDT
by
DBrow
To: DBrow
When's that happening?
And pardon me if I celebrate and give out cakes and candies the day Lautenberg croaks. A real piece of shit, that one.
19
posted on
03/29/2011 8:22:55 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(The Democrat Party is Communist. The Republican Party is Socialist. The Tea Party is Capitalist.)
To: DBrow
Lautenberg’s another brain dead Democrat. Has been for years. Wonder who is pulling his strings?
20
posted on
03/29/2011 8:26:02 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(The last Democrat worth a damn was Stalin. He purged his whole Party.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson