Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan Switches Sides, Expanding Arms Allegiance With China and Leaving U.S. Behind
FOXNews.com ^ | March 26, 2011 | By Dominic Di-Natale

Posted on 03/26/2011 9:43:56 PM PDT by metmom

ISLAMABAD – Pakistan is beefing up its arsenal of nuclear-capable missiles by embracing China as its new strategic arms partner and backing away from the U.S., analysts have told Fox News.

Pakistan earlier this month test-fired a nuclear-capable missile from an undisclosed location – the second in a month of try-outs for its short-range surface-to-surface Hataf 2 class rocket, co-developed with the Chinese. It was the latest in a series of arms collaborations between the two nations, which view their strategic partnership as a counterweight to a boldly confident India, which has American support.

Until the mid-1960s, the United States was the principal supplier of weapons to Pakistan, the world’s eighth most-powerful nuclear nation. But the U.S. began to back away from the relationship after years of difficult and sometimes unpredictable relations following the 9/11 attacks. The U.S. no longer fully supports the military ambitions of a Pakistan that is being destabilized by an insurgency it cannot control, rising radicalism and anti-Westernism, and a government considered by some too weak and corrupt.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arms; china; pakistan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 03/26/2011 9:44:00 PM PDT by metmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: metmom

Well, I think they’ve figured out by now that if they get into trouble, the Obama administration will, at best, waffle and at worst leave them in the lurch in favor of Muslim extremists. I have a hard time blaming them for seeing China as more likely to be there for them in time of trouble, at least until Obama is gone.


2 posted on 03/26/2011 9:48:22 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Ping.


3 posted on 03/26/2011 9:49:18 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Well, if he’ll screw us, he’ll screw anyone.


4 posted on 03/26/2011 9:52:41 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I thought China executed terrorists.


5 posted on 03/26/2011 9:53:51 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Gee, I thought Hitlery was such good friends with Pakistan.


6 posted on 03/26/2011 9:54:31 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

Maybe that’s only terrorists that terrorize THEM.


7 posted on 03/26/2011 9:57:41 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Very smart move for Pakistan...

FLASHBACK: Obama: Move Al Qaeda Battle From Iraq To Pakistan

8 posted on 03/26/2011 9:58:57 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Gee, I thought Hitlery was such good friends with Pakistan.

Maybe that's part of the problem.

Would you trust a face like that?

Besides, she's a woman (technically).

9 posted on 03/26/2011 9:59:11 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: metmom
There is no way to be allied with both Pakistan and India. Pakistan is a Muslim country that harbors al Quida. India is not Muslim and is the largest democracy in the world. The choice should be easy. We should be cementing our relationship with India and attacking al quida in Pakistan.
10 posted on 03/26/2011 10:01:45 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
0bama talked about attacking Pakistan during his campaign. Now he's come up with a new excuse to attack countries based on "Responsibility to Protect."

Driven into the arms of another.

11 posted on 03/26/2011 10:05:41 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
We should be cementing our relationship with India and attacking al quida in Pakistan.

I think we're falling right into the plans of Al Qaeda by going into Libya.

Watch for these protests to start up in nuclear Pakistan once we're tied down in Libya.

12 posted on 03/26/2011 10:06:59 PM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: metmom
The U.S. no longer fully supports the military ambitions of a Pakistan that is being destabilized by an insurgency it cannot control, rising radicalism and anti-Westernism, and a government considered by some too weak and corrupt.

For decades now, the problem hasn't been the Pakistani government. It's the Pakistani people. The wave of religious fervor comes from one thing - all the secular types had lots of fun, but no kids. All the religious types had no fun, but plenty of children. In Pakistan, as in the rest of the Muslim world, demographics is destiny. If a kinder and gentler Mongol horde were to conquer Pakistan today, its first act would be to sterilize every mosque attendee and imam in the country.

13 posted on 03/26/2011 10:08:50 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Let's see. The US just supported (and hell, probably instigated) the collapse of the Mubarak regime in Egypt in favor of the Muslin Brotherhood.

Now, we're bombing Libyan forces essentially on behalf of Al Qaida.

If I were in Pakistan's shoes, I'd do the same.

14 posted on 03/26/2011 10:22:21 PM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

As I understand it the strategic significance of Afghanistan is that if it falls to the Taliban, Pakistan will ultimately fall to the Taliban along with its nuclear arsenal. Eventually it may be necessary for the U.S. to withdraw to the India-Pakistan border and partner with India.


15 posted on 03/26/2011 10:23:38 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

IMHO...

This is what is really going on with all the revolutions in the mideast, including Libya.

the far left intelligentsia, i.e., soros, etc., is getting attempting to swing all world opinion against the u.s.

with nobama in office, this can proceed fairly fast.

libya is a demonstration of this: virtually all media, including fox, is not pointing out that this is all over european oil supply.

europe is dumb enough to side with the foreign fighters who are moving into libya and go along with pushing out qdaffy.

I think there is a high probability that the new government of Libya would not sell them oil anyway if they can dislodge qdaffy.

I think Britain, France, Italy should reverse course immediately, say that they have discovered the terrorist connection to the revolution and work to help qdaffy remain in power. Between them and the U.S., there will be enough carrot and stick to keep qdaffy selling oil to the west.

pakistan walking away from the U.S. is an issue that needs handling.

We need to lean on Congress as hard as possible to pull out of Libyan operation.

We need Britain and France to pull out of Libyan operation, all pressure that can be put on them should be applied.

Repub Congressmen need to be made aware that this situation may start to rapidly degrade and we need to keep too much momentum from swinging against the U.S. during the 22 months ahead.

The U.S. should get out of Libyan operation asap.

Any efforts that can be made by anyone to collapse the Libyan revolution are very needed.

I think U.S. planning has been completely duped by leftists, i.e., Dr. Evil, i.e., soros and the like, into thinking they can promote democracy in the mideast, when really we are going to lose access to ALL mideast oil.

Emergency, emergency.

Saudi Arabia is a big, fat target for revolutionaries and they have their sights set. Don’t bother talking about drilling at home, this is simple math: of the oil under the ground, how much can China buy versus how much the U.S. can buy. And SA and the small states need to stay on the Western side due to how much oil they represent.

I think this may be coming up soon - we need to make Congress aware. Saudi Arabia needs to be defended at all costs, even if an independent venture, no matter what slaughter has to take place.

As far as terrorism goes, at this point, it’s beyond that, we need to not give up oil that we have access to at this point.

The U.S. dollar must strenthen. China is planning on being the standard world currency; this is maybe planned for the not too distant future.

We NEED to start U.S. government austerity programs IMMEDIATELY.

We need to get started making businesses IMMEDIATELY, that is the ultimate strengthener of the dollar.


16 posted on 03/26/2011 10:26:54 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (Huguenot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

That makes too much sense and doesn’t line someone’s pockets.

It’s not going to go because it’s good for this country.


17 posted on 03/26/2011 10:28:58 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: metmom; HiTech RedNeck

Don’t blame them. Going with the strong horse.


18 posted on 03/26/2011 10:59:00 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

If you were leading a nation outside of the US, would you want to ally yourself with the current bunch in the White House?

I wouldn’t.


19 posted on 03/26/2011 11:16:12 PM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Cannot say I blame them given the current government and is supporters on the right and left, do you think any third world country will believe anything the government says, when you start trying to kill all the countries leaders you don’t like. They are just trying to look out for them selves.


20 posted on 03/26/2011 11:23:26 PM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson