*Anybody care?* Obama's Social Security number goes to court (seeks evidence of fraud)

WND ^ | Corsi

[cycle of discernment]

Obama's Social Security number goes to court Complaint in federal district seeks evidence of suspected fraud

February 07, 2011

By Jerome R. Corsi © 2011 WorldNetDaily

At the heart of the complaint to the court is the suspicion that Obama has engaged in Social Security fraud by using a number initially issued to another person.

[snip]

[danamco]

I think that Sven Magnusson has explained and said that the SS# from Connecticut is a valid one, hmmm???

[danamco]

Yep, BJC’s BJ in the oval office added to his resume, while a NY (R) congressman’s craig list photo got him booted out

[cynwoody]

Baskin-Robbins is a franchise operation, and there is no way he was paid in cash.

One does not follow from the other. Franchisees are independent businesses. Baskin-Robbins would not be involved in the payroll operations of its franchisee.

If a franchisee were getting slews of do-not-match letters from the SSA, if it was paying its employees under the table, Baskin-Robbins would not be the one to catch them. Although, they would certainly notice after the fact, if, say, a franchisee got hit with an I-9 audit from ICE and ended up in the news for having to fire half its employees, as happened to Chipotle in Minnesota recently.

[Beckwith]

Baskin-Robbins would not be involved in the payroll operations of its franchisee.

Perhaps, but the franchiser watches the books like an eagle.

I've consulted to a bunch of them and they really control the franchise environment, most often having the franchisee use their corporate software systems

For example, just ask any McDonalds employee for an extra cup -- you won't get it -- McDonalds even controls on the paper cups.

It just wouldn't be in the franchisee's interest to pay a kid under the table.