Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Richardson records sealed for 8 years (NM - What's he got to hide?? /s)
Santa Fe New Mexican ^ | January 31, 2011 | Steve Terrell

Posted on 02/01/2011 7:35:43 AM PST by CedarDave

About two weeks before he left office, Gov. Bill Richardson's staff handed over his office's records to the State Records Center and Archives. But there was one condition.

Richardson agreed to turn over his records under the condition that for the next eight years, only four people would have access or be able to grant access to the documents — Richardson himself; his chief of staff, Brian Condit; general counsel Justin Miller; and scheduler Janis Hartley.

Richardson's action is allowed under a state law passed in 1967, Records Center Director Sandra Jaramillo said ...

Attempts to reach Richardson and his spokeswomen were not successful Monday night.

Already, a public-information request by a television news reporter has been denied because of the request.

The KOB reporter isn't the only one who has been turned down for Richardson records this year.

Scott Darnell, spokesman for Gov. Susana Martinez, said in an e-mail Monday, "We've attempted to get particular information and been denied as well." Asked what recourse the administration has to obtain those records, Darnell replied, "It doesn't appear that we have any at this point."

Before Jan. 1, most of the records would have been considered public documents, which under the state Inspection of Public Records Act, anyone could ask to see.

(Excerpt) Read more at santafenewmexican.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: billrichardson; briancondit; campaignfunds; janishartley; justinmiller; paytoplay; richardson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
I presume a subpoena by a US attorney might get access to documents, but I imagine it would have to address specific items so as not to be considered a fishing expedition.
1 posted on 02/01/2011 7:35:49 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt; Rogle; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; OneWingedShark; ...

NM list PING! Click on the flag to go to the Free Republic New Mexico message page.

(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for anyone to use. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)

2 posted on 02/01/2011 7:36:54 AM PST by CedarDave (What is DADT? Obama's response when inquiries are made about his birth certificate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

The statute of limitations does not cover fraud.


3 posted on 02/01/2011 7:38:27 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

If we peons didn’t work for HIM, then I’d have a problem with this ...

Hey ... wait a minute....


4 posted on 02/01/2011 7:43:52 AM PST by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
"The statute of limitations does not cover fraud."

Actually, it does, both federally and in the states. Each state is different, and the feds have dozens of varying types of fraud charges, each with their own SOL.

However, the feds (and some states), are masters at the RICO charge, which can "reach back" beyond the SOL expiration date, to build a foundation for the RICO case. So, while you can't be prosecuted for the specific fraud if the SOL has passed, that incident can still be rolled into the the larger RICO indictment.

5 posted on 02/01/2011 7:49:57 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Should not those records belong to the citizens of the State of New Mexico? Maybe I am unaware and it is SOP for ex-governors to have the right to control access to their public papers and records, but if a departing governor of my State tried to do this I would expect the local press to go ballistic. We are NOT talking about national security here, which could and should apply to certain parts of a President's records. Richardson was just a f***ing governor!

Also, how does this square with the Alaskan e-mail dump from Gov. Palin's time in Juneau that's scheduled for later this year?

6 posted on 02/01/2011 7:51:56 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
"I presume a subpoena by a US attorney might get access to documents, but I imagine it would have to address specific items so as not to be considered a fishing expedition. "

You would be surprised. Federal grand jury public corruption investigations are SWEEPING. If the feds have a solid foundation for a case, they'll be looking at his 3rd grade report cards.

Honestly though, can you imagine if a Republican governor had done this? Its surprising that a law like this exists, given the sunshine laws that have been passed in most states the last 30-years.

7 posted on 02/01/2011 7:52:56 AM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

What state law giveth, state law can taketh away.


8 posted on 02/01/2011 7:53:34 AM PST by vollmond (I'm an issues voter. If you're a Democrat, I've got issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
"HIS records"?!! Why are they not the peoples' records?
9 posted on 02/01/2011 7:55:24 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Napolean fries the idea powder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

New Mexico is now in a better place!

Gov. Susana Martinez orders Arizona-style immigration reform
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2666688/posts?page=31


10 posted on 02/01/2011 7:57:34 AM PST by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Richardson agreed to turn over his records under the condition that for the next eight years, only four people would have access or be able to grant access to the documents

Access??! I don't need no friggin access grant. I can take as many documents as I can stuff in my pants.

11 posted on 02/01/2011 7:59:49 AM PST by RoadKingSE (How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

How is it that public records can be sealed for other than for matters of national defense matters??


12 posted on 02/01/2011 8:01:26 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I have no doubt that Susana would go after him. If it weren’t for this law, Gary King would be the only friend he has to cover for him.


13 posted on 02/01/2011 8:02:31 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Jubtabulously We Thrive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Ok, outside of an active police investigation or a national guard issue,,, why does a state EVER warrant the use of such secrecy? They don’t exactly have nuclear missiles.


14 posted on 02/01/2011 8:02:50 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Richardson was the one who said, in Spanish, that Obama was an immigrant, was he not?

I’m just saying.


15 posted on 02/01/2011 8:07:29 AM PST by Carlucci (Don't care what religion my president is, as long as he worships -- THE CONSTITUTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

In the early days of seeking the Dem nomination for president, Richardson referred to Barry as “an immigrant”, as I recall.


16 posted on 02/01/2011 8:10:12 AM PST by circumbendibus (Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre; DesertRhino
Richardson's action is allowed under a state law passed in 1967, Records Center Director Sandra Jaramillo said ...

I think the law needs updating and I wouldn't be a bit surprised if it comes under scrutiny in the next 60 day legislative session. However, Susana's got a lot on her plate right now.

17 posted on 02/01/2011 8:11:28 AM PST by CedarDave (What is DADT? Obama's response when inquiries are made about his birth certificate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
It makes one wonder....

What is the statue of limitations on RICO offenses,

....bribery, conspiracy to defraud.... etc... etc... etc..

etc... etc... etc... etc...

Hmmmmmmm....

18 posted on 02/01/2011 8:11:38 AM PST by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Ah, transparency...I hope NM’s citizens show the appropriate outrage.

Colonel, USAFR


19 posted on 02/01/2011 8:12:27 AM PST by jagusafr ("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
why does a state EVER warrant the use of such secrecy? They don’t exactly have nuclear missiles.

This is New Mexico, the worlds 3rd largest nuclear power based on what's stored here.;)

20 posted on 02/01/2011 8:15:06 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Jubtabulously We Thrive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson