I presume a subpoena by a US attorney might get access to documents, but I imagine it would have to address specific items so as not to be considered a fishing expedition.
1 posted on
02/01/2011 7:35:49 AM PST by
CedarDave
To: LegendHasIt; Rogle; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; OneWingedShark; ...
NM list PING! Click on the flag to go to the Free Republic New Mexico message page.
(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for anyone to use. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
2 posted on
02/01/2011 7:36:54 AM PST by
CedarDave
(What is DADT? Obama's response when inquiries are made about his birth certificate.)
To: CedarDave
The statute of limitations does not cover fraud.
3 posted on
02/01/2011 7:38:27 AM PST by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: CedarDave
If we peons didn’t work for HIM, then I’d have a problem with this ...
Hey ... wait a minute....
4 posted on
02/01/2011 7:43:52 AM PST by
Hodar
(Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
To: CedarDave
Should not those records belong to the citizens of the State of New Mexico? Maybe I am unaware and it is SOP for ex-governors to have the right to control access to their public papers and records, but if a departing governor of my State tried to do this I would expect the local press to go ballistic. We are NOT talking about national security here, which could and should apply to certain parts of a President's records. Richardson was just a f***ing governor!
Also, how does this square with the Alaskan e-mail dump from Gov. Palin's time in Juneau that's scheduled for later this year?
6 posted on
02/01/2011 7:51:56 AM PST by
katana
To: CedarDave
"I presume a subpoena by a US attorney might get access to documents, but I imagine it would have to address specific items so as not to be considered a fishing expedition. " You would be surprised. Federal grand jury public corruption investigations are SWEEPING. If the feds have a solid foundation for a case, they'll be looking at his 3rd grade report cards.
Honestly though, can you imagine if a Republican governor had done this? Its surprising that a law like this exists, given the sunshine laws that have been passed in most states the last 30-years.
To: CedarDave
"HIS records"?!! Why are they not the peoples' records?
9 posted on
02/01/2011 7:55:24 AM PST by
Paine in the Neck
(Napolean fries the idea powder.)
To: CedarDave
10 posted on
02/01/2011 7:57:34 AM PST by
AuntB
(Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
To: CedarDave
Richardson agreed to turn over his records under the condition that for the next eight years, only four people would have access or be able to grant access to the documents 
Access??! I don't need no friggin access grant. I can take as many documents as I can stuff in my pants.
11 posted on
02/01/2011 7:59:49 AM PST by
RoadKingSE
(How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash ?)
To: CedarDave
How is it that public records can be sealed for other than for matters of national defense matters??
12 posted on
02/01/2011 8:01:26 AM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
To: CedarDave
I have no doubt that Susana would go after him. If it weren’t for this law, Gary King would be the only friend he has to cover for him.
13 posted on
02/01/2011 8:02:31 AM PST by
Tijeras_Slim
(Jubtabulously We Thrive!)
To: CedarDave
Ok, outside of an active police investigation or a national guard issue,,, why does a state EVER warrant the use of such secrecy? They don’t exactly have nuclear missiles.
14 posted on
02/01/2011 8:02:50 AM PST by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
To: CedarDave
Richardson was the one who said, in Spanish, that Obama was an immigrant, was he not?
I’m just saying.
15 posted on
02/01/2011 8:07:29 AM PST by
Carlucci
(Don't care what religion my president is, as long as he worships -- THE CONSTITUTION!)
To: CedarDave
In the early days of seeking the Dem nomination for president, Richardson referred to Barry as “an immigrant”, as I recall.
16 posted on
02/01/2011 8:10:12 AM PST by
circumbendibus
(Obama is an unconstitutional illegal putative president. Quo Warranto in 2011)
To: CedarDave
It makes one wonder....
What is the statue of limitations on RICO offenses,
....bribery, conspiracy to defraud.... etc... etc... etc..
etc... etc... etc... etc...
Hmmmmmmm....
18 posted on
02/01/2011 8:11:38 AM PST by
Wings-n-Wind
(The main things are the plain things!)
To: CedarDave
Ah, transparency...I hope NM’s citizens show the appropriate outrage.
Colonel, USAFR
19 posted on
02/01/2011 8:12:27 AM PST by
jagusafr
("We hold these truths to be self-evident...")
To: CedarDave
The leftists learned well from “The Zero”
21 posted on
02/01/2011 8:20:18 AM PST by
Lessthantolerant
(The State is diametrically opposed to our search for a better living.)
To: CedarDave
Just a rumor, but I heard he likes to hide and steal food out of the hands of starving people.
25 posted on
02/01/2011 8:43:45 AM PST by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: CedarDave
What a bunch of BS! Perhaps he should be in prison for eight years until the records are released.
26 posted on
02/01/2011 8:51:17 AM PST by
CPT Clay
(Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
To: CedarDave
Hey, isn't Roswell in New Mexico?
Maybe it's the real alien autopsy footage.
Or Barry's long form.
Or whatever it is that keeps Barney Frank out of prison.
Today is a good day to die.
I didn't say for whom. 27 posted on
02/01/2011 9:07:21 AM PST by
The Comedian
(It's 3am all over the planet.)
To: CedarDave
Well...it’s 2019 ...let’s see ‘em.
28 posted on
07/14/2019 9:47:32 PM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson