Posted on 12/05/2010 5:23:38 PM PST by adorno
Read the following for your amusement and amazement about how so many liberals out there think; it's amazing to me that people with that kind of thinking actually votes to undo the votes of the much better informed.
Here is a thought I had recently. Say we wake up tomorrow morning to find all the working poor and unemployed had vanished in this country. The economy would instantly grind to a STOP. All the jobs and money not being spent would instantly cause everything to stop. Now say instead of the working poor and unemployed everyone in the middle class vanished over night? I think the same would happen maybe slightly slower but the effect on our economy would be very quickly disastrous. Now imagine that the richest 2 or 3 percent were instead to vanish over night? Would we even notice it as we rose and went to work? As far as I know I would still have a job and my business would still run as usual. Most of the very rich are owners and in some cases CEO's granted but they are not vital to the day to day operation of anything that I know of. Most businesses can run just fine without their owners and or CEO's. In fact I would go further to say that the economy would improve dramatically cause well soon lawyer of family members and every single relative both know and to this moment unknown would be circling for a piece of the huge pie left behind by the rich. Businesses would be broken up and huge sums of cash, stocks and bonds would be divided up amongst many. Where there was several HUGE piles of wealth there would after many a court battle be many smaller sums of monies to spread around and to be spent flooding the economy with wealth and from that there will be new rich but many smaller rich folk and far more opportunity than there is today for everyone to get a piece of it.
I'm still amazed at how, frankly stupid, that person actually sounds.
O.M.G.
Unless and until someone can describe the diffrence between “Supply and Demand” and “Quantity Supplied and Quantity Demanded” he/she not only should be precluded from voting on any economic issues but also commentary on the same.
It is like asking a person who doesn’t understand set theory to comment on the Relational Model.
Exactly right.
To the person who wrote that post, wealth just magically materializes from the natural resources and wealthy people and the people who create a country’s wealth are immaterial.
While it was funny it was also sad. It was sad because these people are allowed to be in a position to influence the thoughts of others.
Did you know food stamps are good for the economy? So says the High Priestess of Botox, Nancy Pelosi. Again, sad.
You may have stumbled across the dumbest person on the internet
the genius advocating this has basically laid out the “African strategy”: get rid of those evil white farmers/landowners and everyone else will prosper...only when you get rid of those ACTUALLY responsible for producing, you are left with parasites who quickly gobble up the resources.
Those “evil” CEO’s are responsible for creating millions of jobs.
Liberals have a hard time accepting and comprehending creators and the purpose they serve.
Link?
The liberal democrat is so twisted that normal right thinking that actually works well is an obamanation to the leftwing marxists. They are all fools of the worst sort and will destroy all of us if we do not stop them.
Okay, I was hoping nobody would ask, but, I owe it to the good people here to see the nuttiness first hand.
You might notice my responses to the poster, and I actually almost lost it and sometime became so incensed at the stupidity that I might sometimes not make sense myself.
But, here goes: http://www.zdnet.com/tb/1-90839?tag=mantle_skin;content
Do a find for the series of posts from James Quinn.
[the diffrence between Supply and Demand and Quantity Supplied and Quantity Demanded he/she not only should be precluded from voting on any economic issues but also commentary on the same.]
Democrat economics, a sure way to destroy all wealth from America.
>>Democrat economics, a sure way to destroy all wealth from America.<<
Yep — wealth comes from the behinds of evil people, who then hoard it.
ABC news just said that extending the tax cuts would add four trillion to the deficit over ten years..of course cutting spending is never part of the formula. Never an acknowledgment that they spend too much, no they believe they tax too little.
Prima facie evidence of terminal stupidity.
For example, if all the unemployed disappeared tonight, how on earth would that bring the economy to a screeching halt...???
We'd have to pay a new group of slackers to not work.
If businesses are broken up, how many people would no longer have jobs?
Why, because all their massive spending would suddenly stop. Nevermind that all the welfare, and therefore taxes to pay for it, would also suddenly stop, and the taxpayers suddenly having all that extra money to spend for themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.