Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/29/2010 11:15:00 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968; ...

Ping


2 posted on 11/29/2010 11:18:11 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

” ... GE’s argument for the second engine is simple. By developing an alternate engine, the government would get a backup supplier, and competition between two suppliers would create long-term savings over the life of the $100 billion procurement ... “


I believe this is a valid argument. It could be that specifics invalidate the argument, but I haven’t seen any.

PW has plied a lot money via lobbyist and perhaps direct deposit to be sole source for a reason!


4 posted on 11/29/2010 11:38:38 PM PST by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Sole source is a bad, bad idea. Removing competition is a bad, bad idea. Generally speaking.


8 posted on 11/30/2010 9:08:56 AM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Related...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-29/lawmakers-press-white-house-to-include-ge-engine-in-stopgap-bill.html


9 posted on 11/30/2010 9:47:15 AM PST by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson