Posted on 10/14/2010 11:35:26 AM PDT by FTJM
It's possible that teen mom Bristol Palin may be regretting her barely-there outfit and sexy dance moves from Monday night's "Dancing with the Stars" performance.
The political daughter showed some serious skin in her rumba with partner Mark Ballas, and she may think twice next time. "I go around and I talk about abstinence, then I'm out here in my underwear," she told "Extra." Her hindsight is getting clearer.
Whether Bristol questioned it or not, her parents Sarah and Todd Palin did not. "They were proud of me," she said. "They thought I did a good job and I'm happy with that."
On Tuesday's elimination, Bristol was at the bottom of the chopping block, but it was "Jersey Shore's" Mike "The Situation" and his partner Karina Smirnoff who got the boot. Skipping a press line backstage, Mike left Karina to speak to the media.
(Excerpt) Read more at extratv.warnerbros.com ...
Yeah but Billy wasn't out there preaching temperance while at the same time peddling beer.
“That position is probably how 3/4 of all females since Eve have been “knocked up”. How do hacklehead’s come to be here, the stork?”
I’m not sure but I have a theory that humorless jerks are conceived anally.
Wow, you sure know a lot about porn...
> Note: It wasn’t me that watched the show.
I didn’t watch the show either. I don’t even have a television.
All I saw were the photos in this thread. Do you consider them wholesome depictions? I can say plainly that I don’t.
> you are just coming across as a repressed prude with a
> moral superiority complex.
Remember ... judge not lest ye be judged, for whatever measure you mete, it shall be measured again unto you.
Sarah?
> Wow, you sure know a lot about porn...
I know it when I see it.
Apparently you and I disagree on what is pornographic.
That’s perfectly ok with me. Why is it not ok with you?
So you are basing your judgment on essentially nothing.
Remember ... judge not lest ye be judged...
I'm not a Christian, but I do agree that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Then again, I'm not implying a gal is a slut porn star just because she's on a dance show.
“a particularly revealing standard of dress is no guarantee of vice...”
...or the Tango since she was dancing in a competition lol
> So you are basing your judgment on essentially nothing.
Well, I wouldn’t call those photos “nothing”. If they’re nothing to you, that’s ok with me. We differ on that, and I have no problem with that. Do you?
As for me and my house, we try to live by a different standard. We have no intention of imposing that on you, but you shouldn’t be so quick to demean and denigrate me for simply expressing an honestly held opinion and my reasons for it.
I believe that people should be free to make choices about moral matters. Including their verbiage. What better way to correctly judge a person’s moral compass? And there is nothing wrong or hypocritical with that type of judgement.
You yourself make such judgements all day long. You must, in order to live in this world. If you didn’t make any judgements, you would be a fool.
You expressed your judgements about me. And I’m okay with that. I really am. But there is irony in that you should call me a hypocrite and use strong language against me while judging me for my opinion about what I consider to be photos depicting moral torpitude.
Indeed, people in glass houses ...
> Then again, I’m not implying a gal is a slut porn star
> just because she’s on a dance show.
I said no such thing. That’s you putting words in my mouth.
What I said was that the photo was what we would have considered soft porn a generation ago, and that the photo vindicated my original opinion that Bristol was participating in a wanton exhibition of bad taste.
This is an opinion shared by more than a few FReepers.
Not that numbers mean anything, just that it’s not just me.
Round and round and round...
I never claimed the moral high ground based on a religious standard. You did.
Sorry if my pointing this out to you put a bee in your bonnet.
Because she's Bristol or because she's good?
Soft porn is still porn right? You "know it when you see it" and from these one or two photos this is definitely IT to you.
And no, the number of people who believe a "wrong" idea in no way adds to the truth of a matter. Look at how many people voted for Obama to see the truth of this.
Seems a lot better than running around calling a relatively modest dance routine "soft porn".
Great handle, by the way
Oh goodness gracious.
LOL!
Westbrook: I know it when I see it.
I guess you've done a lot of research.
Now I get it....you're a hypocrit.
I didnt watch the show either. I dont even have a television.
Judging three performances based on one picture, not based on watching the shows to get full context and comparison.
The entire discussion sure makes one wonder why some get so defensive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.