> Then again, I’m not implying a gal is a slut porn star
> just because she’s on a dance show.
I said no such thing. That’s you putting words in my mouth.
What I said was that the photo was what we would have considered soft porn a generation ago, and that the photo vindicated my original opinion that Bristol was participating in a wanton exhibition of bad taste.
This is an opinion shared by more than a few FReepers.
Not that numbers mean anything, just that it’s not just me.
Soft porn is still porn right? You "know it when you see it" and from these one or two photos this is definitely IT to you.
And no, the number of people who believe a "wrong" idea in no way adds to the truth of a matter. Look at how many people voted for Obama to see the truth of this.
The entire discussion sure makes one wonder why some get so defensive.