Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA Now Accepting Public Comment on Petition to Ban Lead in Ammunition and Fishing Tackle
CNSNews.com ^ | Thursday, August 26, 2010 | Susan Jones

Posted on 08/26/2010 8:49:43 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

Environmental activists are pressing the Obama administration to ban the manufacture, processing and distribution lead shot, bullets, and fishing sinkers under the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, but hunting and Second Amendment groups say the EPA lacks the authority to do so, for starters.

A petition submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on Aug. 3 says ammunition and tackle manufacturers are now marketing a wide variety of non-lead, nontoxic bullets, shotgun pellets and fishing tackle, which can and should be used instead of lead projectiles and weights.

“There is no technological or commercial reason why nontoxic ammunition and fishing tackle with comparable effectiveness should not be substituted for their lead counterparts,” the petition says.

Petition signatories include the Center for Biological Diversity, American Bird Conservancy, Association of Avian Veterinarians, Project Gutpile, and Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.

The environmental activist groups note that the EPA is specifically prohibited from regulating ammunition or firearms under the Toxic Substances Control Act. But, the groups argue, “toxic components of ammunition can be regulated if nontoxic alternatives are commercially available.”

The petitioners said they have been waiting for nontoxic alternatives to become available “in an effort to clearly indicate that this petition is not an attempt to regulate ammunition or firearms.”

The National Rifle Association’s lobbying arm says the Toxic Substances Control Act “does not grant EPA the authority to regulate ammunition of any composition.”

It rejected the petition's suggestion that the EPA "should in effect divide shells and cartridges into their constituent parts and find that each separate component of a shell or cartridge falls under its jurisdiction."

The National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting sports industry, said if the EPA approves the petition, the result will be a total ban on all ammunition containing lead-core components.

“[Y]our right to choose the ammunition you hunt and shoot with is at stake,” the NSSF said in an Aug. 25 message to all gun owners, hunters and shooters.

The trade group argues there is no scientific evidence showing that the use of traditional ammunition is having an adverse impact on wildlife populations. In fact, the NSSF notes that bald eagle and raptor populations throughout the United States are soaring.

The NSSF also argues that a ban on traditional ammunition would have a negative impact on wildlife conservation, which falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the 50 state wildlife agencies. The 11 percent federal excise tax that manufacturers pay on the sale of the ammunition is a primary source of wildlife conservation funding.

The NSSF is urging those opposed to the “anti-hunting” petition to submit comments online to the EPA or to contact EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson directly.

The public comment period opened on Aug. 25 and ends on October 31. The EPA must decide whether to accept or reject the petition by November 1, 2010, the day before the midterm election.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: ammunition; bang; banglist; bhoepa; democrats; ecofascism; elections; envirofascism; epa; junkscience; obama; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2010 8:49:46 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Here’s my comment.

To the EPA. “Are you Nucking Futs?”


2 posted on 08/26/2010 8:51:15 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Silver is a good substitute for domestic combat.


3 posted on 08/26/2010 8:51:21 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Start the Revolution!!!!!


4 posted on 08/26/2010 8:53:14 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

And they called conservatives all sorts of names when they suggested Obama would take away guns. Guns without bullets are pretty useless.

FUBO


5 posted on 08/26/2010 8:53:36 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012 (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Guess I’ll stock up even more than I have. The criminals have taken over.


6 posted on 08/26/2010 8:53:57 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

and good for hunting vampires and werewolves.

except werewolves may be federally protected in some locales.


7 posted on 08/26/2010 8:54:12 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

What is the NRA saying about this?


8 posted on 08/26/2010 8:54:29 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Look for many members of *K.O.O.K.S. to make comments.

*Keep Our Own Kids Safe


9 posted on 08/26/2010 8:54:48 AM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I’ve sent them my 2 cents worth already.

Here’s another thread going on this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2577874/posts


10 posted on 08/26/2010 8:54:58 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Well, they would first have to peel their lips from Harry Reid’s butt before saying anything.


11 posted on 08/26/2010 8:55:43 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

B@$T@RD$

I got your Comment right here...

this is currently a fact in much of Californication right now....so now the poor condor has to go to ‘the projects’ and eat paint chips, if they want a little lead in their diet....


12 posted on 08/26/2010 8:56:23 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

If the left wing loons in the EPA don’t think this is war!...Wake up America! A lot of us won’t be metrosexuals!!!


13 posted on 08/26/2010 8:57:28 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

My comment.

DEFUND AND DESTROY THE EPA


14 posted on 08/26/2010 8:57:51 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

These bastards are pushing the wrong buttons now!


15 posted on 08/26/2010 8:58:46 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
nontoxic bullets

Does that mean we have to retire the old 'died of lead poisoning' joke? Too bad this whole thing isn't a joke...

16 posted on 08/26/2010 9:00:24 AM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes (Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis

BLOAT.


17 posted on 08/26/2010 9:00:54 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
stock up!

Mike

18 posted on 08/26/2010 9:01:32 AM PDT by MichaelP (Democrats are the party of Special Re-education)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I’ll gladly turn over my ammunition to the EPA. It may be a little quicker than they want, but they can have every bit.


19 posted on 08/26/2010 9:02:25 AM PDT by Renderofveils (My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
What is the NRA saying about this?

Probably trying to cut a deal to let them keep their lead but that would let EPA take everyone else's.

No sarcasm tag either.

20 posted on 08/26/2010 9:03:16 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (It's a time for choosing. You can have liberalism or you can have America. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson