Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transgender conservative Republican takes on Broward-based U.S. Rep. Wasserman Schultz
The Palm Beach Post ^ | May 17, 2010 | Steve Rothaus

Posted on 05/25/2010 4:09:56 AM PDT by truthfreedom

Karen Harrington and Robert Lowry are also seeking the Republican nomination. Whoever wins the Aug. 24 GOP primary faces incumbent Wasserman Schultz of Weston in November.

(Excerpt) Read more at palmbeachpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: donna; donnamilo; milo; transgender
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
The headline says Milo "takes on" Wasserman Schultz. The only way a Republican can take on a Democrat in an election is if they get the Republican nomination.

I'm not the only person who knows that. Someone looking real quick at the headline is going to assume that Milo is the Republican nominee.

Republicans don't want a Transgender Nominee.

1 posted on 05/25/2010 4:09:57 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

There is something inherently unconservative about changing one’s gender.


2 posted on 05/25/2010 4:12:26 AM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Ok. I am confused..

was she born a man and decided to become a woman ? how does that work ? lol


3 posted on 05/25/2010 4:12:43 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative ("I would rather be hated and be a pain in their side than hated and act classy".. me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Republicans might want a science project nominee..... but conservatives don’t.


4 posted on 05/25/2010 4:13:43 AM PDT by Repeat Offender (While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy Saints surrounded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Transgender Conservative is a contradiction.


5 posted on 05/25/2010 4:16:33 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

I am conflicted. Her/his bio is compelling and a local blogger down there gives her props.


6 posted on 05/25/2010 4:16:44 AM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Lance Corporal texted me at 0330 on 2/3/10: AMERICA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Okay, so we found someone politically correct enough to replace Michael Steele with.


7 posted on 05/25/2010 4:17:39 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Shes the man !

or..

Hes the woman !

or.. ummm something like that


8 posted on 05/25/2010 4:19:27 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative ("I would rather be hated and be a pain in their side than hated and act classy".. me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom
No such animal as a transgender conservative.....good grief.

This will be the ONL:Y time that Wasserman has ever LAUGHED or even SMILED!!

9 posted on 05/25/2010 4:19:37 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Furthermore Milo married her sweetheart (a woman) at age 19 and had two kids. That means that Milo—who transitioned from male-to-female via surgery sometime after becoming a spouse and parent—considered herself a woman when she married her wife; that is, she got gay married, something she's now against. Ironically, if Milo tried to remarry Florida courts wouldn't allow her to marry a man because they only take into account your biological gender at birth. So if Ms. Milo wanted to remarry in Florida, she'd have to marry a woman—gay marriage, something she's against.


10 posted on 05/25/2010 4:21:49 AM PDT by TSgt (We will always be prepared, so we may always be free. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Yes, unconservative, I’d agree.

Also, crazy. Something is wrong with them in the head - by definition. They aren’t happy, in their head, with their sex organs, their gender, whatever you want to call it. So, instead of fixing whatever is wrong in their heads, they carve up their bodies. They’re crazy. We don’t want crazy people as our Nominee.


11 posted on 05/25/2010 4:22:10 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

“She” is a crazy man who cut his dick off.


12 posted on 05/25/2010 4:23:06 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Waserman-Schultz of Weston.... So why does she sound like she is from New Jersy?


13 posted on 05/25/2010 4:25:13 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

A transgender person is by definition crazy. We don’t want a crazy nominee, no matter what conservative points they choose to make.


14 posted on 05/25/2010 4:25:25 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

Honestly Karen Harrington is better looking than Wasserman Schultz. Amongst liberal circles this will be like combing matter and anti-matter. Their heads will explode. ;-)


15 posted on 05/25/2010 4:27:49 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

And a society that goes along with it is just as sick.


16 posted on 05/25/2010 4:28:54 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

Oops! Wrong one. Me bad.


17 posted on 05/25/2010 4:29:03 AM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

If he/she/it can change his/her/it sex then can he/she/it be trusted not to change parties?


18 posted on 05/25/2010 4:35:37 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

Well, this is all certainly interesting.

In truth “she” is a man. And will always be a man. A man who has taken hormones to screw with his body chemistry to develop female characteristics, and underwent surgery to mutilate his genitals. But still a man. It’s impossible with current technology to change a man into a woman or vice versa.

And we should not be forced to pretend that it can happen. Ever. Under any circumstances. Oh, you cut your penis off, now you’re a woman. Scientifically impossible. Blood test, chromosomes, still a man. But the Democrats are pushing a Federal Law forcing everyone to pretend that something which is scientifically impossible has actually occurred.

My Freeper name is Truthfreedom, and you might understand why this transgender thing bothers me. I like truth, I like freedom, and this Federal bill takes away the freedom to tell the truth.


19 posted on 05/25/2010 4:37:08 AM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

She probably was. Or maybe Brooklyn.


20 posted on 05/25/2010 4:37:16 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (No matter where you go there are always more stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson