Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Depression 2010?
Investors.com ^ | May 10, 2010 | ROBERT J. SAMUELSON

Posted on 05/10/2010 4:38:53 PM PDT by Kaslin

It is now conventional wisdom that the world has avoided a second Great Depression. Governments and the economists who advise them learned the lessons of the 1930s.

When the gravity of the financial crisis became apparent in late 2008, the response was swift and aggressive. Central banks like the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank dropped interest rates and lent liberally to threatened financial institutions and rattled investors.

The United States and many countries approved "stimulus" programs of tax cuts and additional spending. Panic was halted. A downward spiral of falling private spending and rising unemployment was reversed. The resulting economic slump was awful. But it was not another Great Depression. The worst has passed.

Or has it? Greece's plight challenges this optimistic interpretation. It implies that celebration is premature and that the economic crisis has moved into a new phase: one dominated by the huge debt burdens of governments in advanced societies. Comparisons with the Great Depression remain relevant — and unsettling. Now, as then, we may be prisoners of deep and poorly understood changes to the world economic system.

Historians increasingly attribute the Depression to broad geopolitical upheavals. World War I shattered the existing global economic order. Dominated by Great Britain, it fostered vibrant trade and rested on the gold standard. (Under the gold standard, paper currencies could be converted into gold coins or bullion.)

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/10/2010 4:38:53 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It has simply been delayed while the communists lay the groundwork for the final push.


2 posted on 05/10/2010 4:40:43 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The stimulus did nothing here but keep government employees employed for a while longer. They produced nothing, but they consumed everything. The same thing will happen in Greece. The government employees produce nothing. They consume.

We can't keep flushing money down the toilet and expect our wallets to remain full.

3 posted on 05/10/2010 4:53:39 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

poorly understood = willfully ignored for political expediency


4 posted on 05/10/2010 4:59:33 PM PDT by pingman (Price is what you pay, value is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

>.It is now conventional wisdom that the world has avoided a second Great Depression. <<

Yeah, so was global warming - conventional wisdom, that is.

I guess it depends on where you get your news and who you believe. ;)


5 posted on 05/10/2010 5:11:35 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

The Depression WILL BE HERE...........

All the Kings Horses and All the Kings men ....
couldn’t ........


6 posted on 05/10/2010 5:33:07 PM PDT by EnglishOnly (Fight all out to win OR get out now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Great Depression may have started in 1929 but it was about three years later before the full effect started being felt. Hoover kept reassuring the people everything was getting better all the while the economy was slipping further and further. What your seeing is the start of that effect and the same government response.


7 posted on 05/10/2010 5:44:24 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“It is now conventional wisdom ...

Translation: The reigning ignorance....


8 posted on 05/10/2010 5:45:54 PM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD

“The Great Depression may have started in 1929 but it was about three years later before the full effect started being felt.”

1929 was mostly confined to the collapse of the stock market. What made that recession become the Great Depression was trouble in the banking system over the years 1930-33. About one third of American banks failed, in turn making one third of the American money supply simply disappear completely.

It’s a potential collapse of the banking system and the money supply that put the fear of a second great depression into the mind of economists. That was the driving force behind the push for bailouts.


9 posted on 05/10/2010 9:37:31 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
>>"The worst has passed"

Um...
???
10 posted on 05/10/2010 10:47:51 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I was reading some history books which stated that the Great Depression actually started with the collapse of land prices followed by the stock market. Banks failed because people no longer had assets. Their lands were heavily mortgaged against depressed prices and they lost what savings they had in stocks. Sound familiar?

One can not help but think that this sounds exactly like the situation we find ourselves in now. The difference was that while Hoover and governments refused to pump money into the economy, the world governments are doing the opposite. It wouldn’t be bad if they started manufacturing something like they did in WWII which drove down prices of manufactured goods. But throwing money into bailouts and things that produce nothing is only going to make the situation worst.


11 posted on 05/11/2010 2:12:27 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD

“I was reading some history books which stated that the Great Depression actually started with the collapse of land prices followed by the stock market. Banks failed because people no longer had assets. Their lands were heavily mortgaged against depressed prices and they lost what savings they had in stocks. Sound familiar”

That’s plausible. Farm land was bid up during the boom created by the First World War only to fall sharply following the armistice. Which histories are you reading if I may inquire? Friedman and Schwartz’s A Monetary History of the United States includes an interesting 100 page section on the Depression, “The Great Contraction 1929-1933”. The 1920s were a period of great innovation and productivity that generated a beneficial deflation. The Fed misread the fall in prices and provided too much credit, which found its way into asset prices. The asset bubble in stocks blew in 1929. It’s not clear to me if the following banking crisis was a result of the stock market crash or had its own causes. For instance thousands of rural banks were wiped out by the Dust Bowl’s destruction of the farms of 2 1/2 million people in the Great Plains, something entirely independent of the stock market crash.

In that era you couldn’t get a 30 yr mortgage. You needed to renew your mortgage every 3 years. Banks that were hit by declining asset values needed to call in loans, or at least they were in no position to renew the loans on their books as they matured. Even borrowers who were still employed couldn’t get their loans and mortgages rolled over, so they lost their houses and businesses. Fannie Mae was created to alleviate the situation in the mortgage market. Banks were willing to offer 30 yr mortgages once they were able to sell them to Fannie.

“One can not help but think that this sounds exactly like the situation we find ourselves in now. The difference was that while Hoover and governments refused to pump money into the economy, the world governments are doing the opposite”

You may find that both Hoover and FDR tried pumping money into the economy. They just didn’t do it at anything near to the level that became commonplace after WWII. The level of government spending by Hoover and FDR during the Depression was less than 10% of GNP. Contrast that to the 18-20% level of government spending that is the norm for post WWII spending. WWII ramped government spending to well over 50% of GNP, and pulled a very large percentage of the population into the government workforce. A full 10% of the population was in the military alone.

” It wouldn’t be bad if they started manufacturing something like they did in WWII which drove down prices of manufactured goods. But throwing money into bailouts and things that produce nothing is only going to make the situation worst.”

There is truth in what you say. WWII spending gave millions of Americans paychecks. The only paychecks I see that the bailouts are providing are bonuses to some of the malefactors who helped create the fiasco we are living through.


12 posted on 05/11/2010 8:01:06 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson