1 posted on
04/13/2010 6:41:24 PM PDT by
ezfindit
To: ezfindit
Seems a little strained when you consider that common-law marraige pre-dates the Church.
2 posted on
04/13/2010 6:44:14 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: ezfindit
Why can’t these people just write up a Contract Agreement or something?
Oh right. They want to destroy the meaning of words and the institution of marriage.
3 posted on
04/13/2010 6:49:52 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Entitlement Zombies will become real zombies when the money runs out)
To: ezfindit
Placemark for pingout tomorrow.
5 posted on
04/13/2010 7:39:24 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: ezfindit
Once such civil unions are given any legal standing, other states and even the federal government will quickly follow the legal precedents set in Massachusetts and DC. The state can then compel all religious institutions that support traditional marriage in their social services to either recognize same-sex unions and act contrary to their religious and moral beliefs, or cease operations altogether. These legalized civil unions are the unfortunate stepping stones the state has and will use to promote an anti-Christian and anti-traditional marriage agenda to the society at large, to the detriment of innocent children and traditional couples looking to adopt. Quite correct.
9 posted on
04/13/2010 9:41:35 PM PDT by
iowamark
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson