Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Instant Gunships
Strategy Page ^ | 3/31/2010 | Strategy Page

Posted on 04/04/2010 9:02:41 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

U.S. SOCOM (Special Operations Command) has adopted a U.S. Marine Corps idea to provide an "instant gunship" system, which enables weapons and sensors to be quickly rolled into a C-130 transport and hooked up. This takes a few hours, and turns the C-130 into a gunship (similar in capabilities existing AC-130 gunships). The SOCOM version is called the “Precision Strike Package,” and it contains the sensor package (day/night vidcams with magnification capability) and a 30mm autocannon. In addition, there are launchers for Viper Strike and Griffin guided missiles. Viper Strike is a 90cm (36 inch) long unpowered glider. The 130mm diameter (with the wings folded) weapon weighs 20 kg (44 pounds). Because the Viper Strike comes straight down, it is better suited for urban warfare. Its warhead weighs only 1.8 kg (four pounds), and less than half of that is explosives. This means less damage to nearby civilians, but still powerful and accurate enough to destroy its target. A laser designator makes the Viper Strike accurate enough to hit an automobile, or a foxhole. The Griffin is a 15.6 kg (34.5 pound) guided missile with a 5.9 kg (13 pound) warhead which is larger than that carried by the larger (47 kg) Hellfire missile. To achieve this, Griffin has a shorter range (4 kilometers), which is adequate for a gunship, which is designed to go after targets just below it, not far away.

(Excerpt) Read more at strategypage.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; c130; gunship; socom; socomm; usmc; ussocom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2010 9:02:41 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Cool idea...I could even see this concept being applied to rotary wing, ground and watercraft...


2 posted on 04/04/2010 9:05:07 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
"In 2007, the C-130 became the fifth aircraft—after the English Electric Canberra, B-52 Stratofortress, Tupolev Tu-95, and KC-135 Stratotanker—to mark 50 years of continuous use with its original primary customer, in this case, the United States Air Force"

50 yr of service. Amazing.

3 posted on 04/04/2010 9:08:20 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

A good idea until the Soviet Union gives man portable air defense systems to the Taliban in 3, 2, 1....

Don’t doubt that Putin remembers that the US provided Stinger ManPADS to the Mujihadeen, and the campaign turned on that.


4 posted on 04/04/2010 9:10:16 PM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Like bombing Berlin with the Wright Flyer...


5 posted on 04/04/2010 9:10:51 PM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
"The Lockheed design team was led by Willis Hawkins, starting with a 130 page proposal for the Lockheed L-206.[2] Hall Hibbard, Lockheed vice president and chief engineer, saw the proposal and directed it to Kelly Johnson, who did not care for the low-speed, unarmed aircraft, remarked, "If you sign that letter, you will destroy the Lockheed Company"

It's difficult to be correct 100% of the time.

6 posted on 04/04/2010 9:19:38 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Don’t doubt that Putin remembers that the US provided Stinger ManPADS to the Mujihadeen, and the campaign turned on that.

There are defenses these days. Not saying ManPADS are obsolete or useless, but they are far less effective than they once were.

7 posted on 04/04/2010 9:22:20 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Being the redheaded stepchild in the Pentagon budget has always driven Marine Corps inventiveness.


8 posted on 04/04/2010 9:23:13 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The U-2 should be on that list.


9 posted on 04/04/2010 9:25:29 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy ("It's not the number of burnt cars that worries me. It's the fact that everyone finds this normal..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

What are they gonna do? give night vision, radar, and radar detection capabilities to every bum in the desert?


10 posted on 04/04/2010 9:33:06 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Code One article - "If this design is really as terrible as Kelly Johnson says it is, the Air Force will think that, too, and they'll give the contract to somebody else. I think we ought to submit the proposal."
11 posted on 04/04/2010 9:35:17 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy ("It's not the number of burnt cars that worries me. It's the fact that everyone finds this normal..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Pimp my ride, USMC-style! Love it!


12 posted on 04/04/2010 10:09:29 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (FUBO! FUNP! FUHR! FUBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

I suggest that they don’t have to. C-130s are expensive assets, pilots are highly trained. They must have an overweening survival advantage to make using them against bums in the desert a useful proposition. We have already seen it happen, AC-130s driven from the sky by the growing air defense capability of the Taliban.

Heck, we saw the Hind Mi-24 driven from the skys of Afghanistan by the Mujihadeen in the 1980s.

There will be people we can use this technology against, say the Somali pirates. Just as soon as Vlad the Cad sees that he can apply pressure, gain support, or cause trouble, he can provide ManPADS, and we had better watch for it and have options.


13 posted on 04/05/2010 3:46:48 AM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Mostly in increasing their propaganda arm.


14 posted on 04/05/2010 3:47:50 AM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Interesting idea, but who is going to ‘crew’ it? You still need a trained aircrew you can’t just ask a basic C-130 crew to fly the mission.


15 posted on 04/05/2010 7:12:17 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
They're Marines.

Killing our nation's enemies and blowing sh*t up comes naturally to them ;^)

They don't need no stinking specialized training.

16 posted on 04/05/2010 7:17:51 AM PDT by investigateworld (He is Risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM)

Totally autonomous. It even notifies the crew that it just saved them from a raghead with a MADPAD.

17 posted on 04/05/2010 7:18:23 AM PDT by CholeraJoe ("We are as numerous as the stars in the heavens, and we are all gun-men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
I know but an AC-130 has gunners & sensor operators as well as a cueing system for the pilot. Your standard KC-130 has none of that. So let's say you 'palletize' the gun/sensor package so that you can literally roll it onto a basic C-130 (ignoring for the moment that you'd also need openings for the guns), where you gonna get the gunners? Sensor operators? Is the basic C-130 pilot going to get regular practice using the cueing system?

I just think that a "Shake & Bake" gunship is a little too dangerous to our own troops on the ground. (Gunships are often providing CAS for the good guys).

18 posted on 04/05/2010 7:49:23 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

That’s one of ‘em.

There are a few systems which work on similar principles out there.


19 posted on 04/05/2010 8:13:45 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
James Forrestal and Holland Smith took a boat from the fleet to the beach during the fight for Iwo Jima. Stepping ashore they witnessed the flag raising in the distance. Forrestal said: “Holland, the raising of that flag on Suribachi means a Marine Corps for the next five hundred years.”

I guess you have a point.

20 posted on 04/05/2010 10:58:58 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson