Attitude? read about U.N. Agenda 21 here.
The U.N. hates us, and everything we stand for.
IPCC was just another shot at trying to sink us.
Posted on 03/26/2010 6:20:21 AM PDT by RogerFGay
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has announced yet another “flaw” in their reports. It's time – once and for all – to be very clear about the obvious. There are serious conclusions to be drawn from the fact that the “flaws” in the UN reports produced bias in only one direction.The latest announcement admits an error that supported Vegan propaganda against the meat industry. Researchers have also admitted that there is no scientifically supportable case for the IPCC's exaggerated worst-case sea-level rise (which by the way has been orders of magnitude lower than Al Gore's), dramatic ice-melts in the Himalayas and elsewhere, danger to the South American rain forest, warming of oceans, etc. etc. etc.
These (perhaps more accurately) “forced confessions” are consistent with public awareness, triggered by Climategate, of the general evaporation of the warmers' case.
Their case for dire warnings about man-made global warming has always rested on computer models that predict rapid temperature increases. These “models” were nothing more than an alternative method of presenting extremist “climate change theory.” Predictions made by the models have been consistently wrong. Lacking verification, they carry no more weight in serious scientific discussions than computer games with purely imaginary scenarios designed to entertain players.
There is no actual scientific evidence supporting the models or the warmers' theory on catastrophic man-made global warming. Warmers replaced real temperature data with fake data sets showing the trends they wanted. When the final press for public access to real data came, they destroyed the data.
So, let's be absolutely clear about the obvious. They knew there was no scientifically supportable case for catastrophic man-made global warming. They lied.
For decades, the IPCC has constructed reports containing junk science to promote a scientifically unsupportable theory on catastrophic man-made global warming. A core group incorporated fake data, filtered out real science and data, and presented conclusions in direct contradiction to scientific evidence and consensus. (Other than a core group of warmers, scientists reviewing the IPCC reports insisted that there is no scientific case for catastrophic man-made global warming.)
So, let's be absolutely clear about the obvious. The IPCC is a publicly supported lobbying group that used deceptive practices to promote manipulation of energy markets, higher taxes, economic chaos, global political revolution and the illegitimate “cap-n-trade” industry.
The IPCC public relations campaign continues, but there seems very little room for new moves. Confessing errors in reports allows the IPCC to attempt to manage the public reaction; superficially a much better approach than the dramatic error of denial. After IPCC head Rajenda Pachauri first denied that their rapid Himalayan ice-melt claim was scientifically unsupportable, accusing “skeptics” of “voodoo science.” When solid evidence turned up that Pachauri knew the claim was wrong, it emphasized the deceptive nature of the IPCC and those in charge.
Announcing and discussing their own problems is intended to give the impression that the IPCC has reformed itself into an open-minded, self-critical, and more objective scientific organization. Announcing one problem at a time avoids the big picture and comes with damage control. It's not new to the warming debate. Warmers have battered us with claims of the absolute scientific certainty of their theories – we're on our way to certain catastrophe unless their economic and political demands are met. But when backed into a corner over their junk science, suddenly it's all very complicated and uncertain.
Regarding rapid Himalayan ice-melt, the IPCC eventually issued a statement saying "The IPCC regrets the poor application of well-established IPCC procedures in this instance." When a published paper on rapid sea-level rise was recently retracted, The Guardian was quick to point out, “Many scientists criticized the IPCC approach as too conservative, and several papers since have suggested that sea level could rise more.”
The IPCC was established in 1988 years ago by the UN's World Meteorological Organization (WMO) under the UN's Environment Programme. It was tasked with evaluating the risk of climate change caused by human activity. Although we could not rely on the UN organization to fulfill its task, the task is nonetheless completed. Corruption in the organization and the dishonesty of the core science team has been exposed. Quite publicly, the world has been made aware that human activity does not control the climate. There is no legitimate reason for the IPCC to continue to exist.
So, let's be absolutely clear about the obvious. The IPCC should be shut down – immediately. Each nation then has an independent responsibility to hunt down those involved in the conspiracy and pursue appropriate legal action against them. What could be more obvious?
I agree. Shut her down!!!
But....but...if we shut IPCC down, Al Gore, Lindsey Graham, John McCain, George Soros, and all the other Globalist Whoring dingbats will have to find something else to do /sarc
The devil is in the details, literally.
Thanks for posting this article.
Damn,...I love this article!
Sent this article to a “warmist” friend. Got a short answer back;
“This article is a LIE!”
To whit: "When you hurt the earth, you hurt yourself." The guy is a rock climber who decides chipping a toehold in the mountain so he can climb is wrong.
yitbos
Well written article. Thanks.
Keep poking him.
Global Warming Exposed as the Greatest Scandal in Modern Science
******************************EXCERPT*****************************
Sunday, November 22, 2009
By now you are no doubt au courant with the global warming scam being exposed for what it is. A leading climate "research" organization had its servers hacked and 60 MB of emails and other data have been posted on the internet. (See Mish, Karl Denninger, Lubos Motl, Andrew Bolt, NY Times, Wikipedia.) The takeaway point from the exposed emails is that the scientists in question had an agenda that they promoted, that is they were and are not doing disinterested science. Their actions border on fraud, and may amount to the greatest scandal in modern science.
James Delingpole: Climategate: how the MSM reported the greatest scandal in modern science shows how the media have become advocates for the promotion of the global warming agenda.
One especially interesting email from Michael "Hockey Stick" Mann details efforts to suppress research not to the liking of AGW promoters.
As with anything, follow the money. The Global Warming Industry receives billions of dollars in grants, Al Gore and others have turned it into a lucrative crusade, and governments see it as a tempting source of tax revenue - not to mention a source of new power.
Nations to seek billions in 'climate debt':
CENTRAL American nations will demand $US105 billion ($114.2 billion) from industrialised countries for damages caused by global warming, the region's representatives say.This article demonstrates AGW for what it is: a scheme to rob ordinary people of their money and freedoms.
Central American environment ministers gathered in Guatemala overnight to discuss the so-called "ecological debt" owed to them and to set out a common position ahead of climate talks in Copenhagen next month.
Guatemalan environment minister Luis Ferrate said the $US105 billion ($114.2 billion) price tag was "an estimate" of the damage done by climate change across 16 sectors in Belize, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Panama.
Ferrate minister said the region "had never faced" so much drought, aridity, flooding, and precarious food security.
A formal proposal will be presented in Denmark, officials said.
His Nicaraguan counterpart Juana Arguenal said that Central America would press industrialised countries to reach concrete decisions to reduce "greenhouse" gases at Copenhagen.
"We hope for a deal that is ethical and moral," she said.
Labels: Global Warming, Science
So he gave up the violence of rock climbing?
Ernie. My brain is ready to be soon wrapped in aluminum foil and placed into the refrig for the night. I will book mark this post for later evaluation.
He started using pitons. This was Exxon/Mobile.
yitbos
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
