Posted on 02/22/2010 4:49:25 AM PST by Kaslin
Dr. Adams,
My name is Claire. I am working on a story for the school newspaper, The (UNCW) Seahawk, about Dr. Maurice Martinez and his philosophy regarding Black English in his classroom. I would appreciate the opportunity to ask you a few questions on your views about this issue. I have read your column for Townhall.com and I am very interested in hearing your side of the debate about Black English. Please take some time to think about these questions and get back to me as soon as you have time. Thank you for your time.
Hello Claire. I have some bad news and some good news. The bad news is that I do not do interviews with the school newspaper because it has a 100% rate of error in representing my opinions. This is not because the reporters tend to be stupid. It is because they tend to be liberal and, therefore, tend to suffer from severe moral rather than intellectual hernia. For example, the last time your paper ran a story on one of my opinion pieces it was insinuated that I wished to bomb gay bath houses in San Francisco although there actually aren’t any gay bath houses in San Francisco. Thankfully, the paper stopped short of accusing me of attempting to rape a unicorn.
But there is good news. I am going to respond to all five questions you have submitted by making them the subject of my Monday column on TownHall.com. That way, the paper will not be able to misrepresent my views as they have in the past. TownHall.com is the premier conservative political website in America. So when university administrators try to attack my views it is sort of like Michael Jackson trying to attack Mike Tyson. It also keeps the university newspaper honest.
1. What is your response to Black English being taught in a UNCW classroom? What purpose does it serve to you?
My response is that I am developing a new course proposal to be submitted directly to UNC Wilmington Chancellor Rosemary DePaolo. It will be called EDN 201 “White English.” I’m going to spend an entire semester differentiating White English from Black English and see how long it takes for me to be removed from the classroom.
While I am on leave I will write a book about my experiences. I plan to call it Redneck Jihad: The Art of Sacred Cow Tipping. So my response to your question about “what purpose” this is serving me is simple. I plan to make money off the stupidity of far left professors just as I’ve been doing for years. I plan to use the profits from their stupidity to buy more firearms and go on more hunting trips.
2. Dr. Martinez teaches that one reason for implementing this philosophy is so children who speak this dialect won't be "condemned" for the way the [sic] speak; are his teaching methods an appropriate way to address "No Child Left Behind"?
No, absolutely not. The best way to address “No Child Left Behind” is to repeal it. The Republican Party leaders had it right in the 1980s when they considered eliminating the Department of Education. The federal government has had no business interfering with local schools since we had to send in the National Guard in the 1950s to stop racist Democrats from keeping little black kids from attending the public schools in Arkansas. I think we should get rid of the Department of Education after we first repeal “No Child Left Behind.” That program just proves that George W. Bush was really a big-spending liberal posing as a conservative.
3. Black English is a social dialect that has been defined by sociolinguists, and many claim that more knowledge could be learned to bridge the gap between social dialects and Standard English to help students in school; does this bring validity to Dr. Martinez and his claims, or is his "street talk" best left to the streets?
No, it does not bring validity to Dr. Martinez and his claims. Dr. Martinez was asked to defend his teaching of Black English in the wake of my column last week. This was done at a Black Faculty meeting. Afterwards, a black faculty member who was clearly angry with Martinez called my office. He claimed that Martinez had told them that in his class there were only a few pages of notes on Black English. I sent him the entire 75 page power point presentation. Now, that black faculty member is even angrier with Dr. Martinez.
Dr. Martinez has suffered a very severe and self-inflicted blow to his credibility.
4. Controversy has stemmed from the naming of this dialect: is it racist to label Black English as "Black"?
It is not really racist but it is offensive. But I find the United Negro College Fund to be more offensive. Not to mention the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Oh yes, and the Black Faculty meetings at UNCW are offensive, too. Maybe Chancellor DePaolo could reinstate the “white” and “colored” restrooms in the name of diversity, tolerance, and inclusion.
5. In your column, you stated that many parents should request their tuition money back. Why do you feel that Black English is a waste of funds?
Well, thanks for asking about my feelings. I like talking about my feelings. But my feelings about Black English require little elaboration. Black English just makes me feel filthy when I repeat it. Kind of like when the feminists chant the c-word in The Vagina Monologues. In White Redneck English we say “At (not “dat”) just ain’t right.”
By way of analogy, imagine that you see a large pile of dog manure in your front yard. There’s no need to walk over to the pile and pick it up to know it is manure. There’s no need to rub it on your face or take a bite out of it to know it is manure. You do not have to “immerse” yourself in it or in any way analyze it to know it is manure. You just need to scoop it off your lawn before someone steps on it and tracks it into your hizzie.
It’s the same way with Black English. It is self-evident that it is simply pseudo-intellectual manure. It has no place in higher education.
Thank you again for your time, I appreciate your responses.
No, thank you! I enjoy talking about this. It’s fun to make coins while girding your loins. It’s even better than making scrilla while keeping it rilla!
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Back when this was first discussed, we should have been learning the language of our 21st-century enemies.
...for the unemployment line.
Ping for later.
“The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see.”
Ayn Rand
Very nice.
What ever happened to ebonics?
Great, as always. I had a friend in law school who proposed to me that insisting that black students speak standard English was “robbing them of their culture.”
Seriously. She is a local judge now. Scary, I know.
Wow! Not exactly afraid of the PC thought police, is he?
Yea, well whether you screw balls like it or not, within the next 20 years or so, “BLACK ENGLISH” will be synonymous with “U.S. AMERICAN” ENGLISH. It already is in most U.S. “Urban” areas.
Take heart howevever, there’s a growing percentage of places, businesses and even gov’t offices where Spanish is spoken more frequently than English and they don’t have to hire those who speak “Black English” because.........the laws just don’t apply to them.
Bwahahaha!
Another gem from Mike Adams. Or like Joe Biden attacking Dick Cheney over foreign policy?
A well-dressed lady a bit past her middle age is standing, pocketbook in hand, in front of an open sewer lid and cursing. She doesn't seem to be a little bit agitated -- perhaps a bit peeved -- but the cursing is choicest, dirtiest lumberjack lingo possible.What is going on?
Simple. The sewer workers were overheard talking by that lady and she felt the need to correct them. She works in the English Language Department.
It “ebolved.”
For example, baby’s daddy/mama is now the more palatable “common law husband/wife”.
In the new land of Uhmurruhka, they can speak all the pidgin English they want. That is, once it has been established...
Oh no he de'ent.
Pocketbook? I haven’t heard that term since I was a little girl - and that has been a while. :-)
It seems to have faded away on its own,probably to be replaced by something worse.
Years ago, I had a wild argument with a Liberal "Educator". He explained to me that the students were more comfortable, and the language reduced their struggles, etc.etc..
My response, which ended the exchange was:
"I was a child in a neighborhood filled with refugees from Eastern Europe. We actually had a small two-room schoolhouse. While Polish and Lithuanian were spoken in the homes, the children interacted with each other and the teachers, and began speaking English exclusively. This motivated the parents to do likewise, and by Grade 6, practically all conversation was then in English.
Are you telling me that people of African descent have to be coddled because you think they are genetically or intellectually INFERIOR, you racist pig???"
Thomas Sowell book - Black Rednecks and White Liberals also exposed the lame excuses of the status quo to support (and praise!>) the 'dumbing down' of black culture (language, education, etc.). No different than the plantation owners not allowing them to read or get educated.
The reality is that liberals want to pretend that they are feeling the pain of blacks while inflicting them with the means to keep them as captives of victimhood. They pull them out and use them each election cycle and them stuff them back in their miserable lives.
It is kind of like bilingual teaching around here, they want to make sure that they can never compete with English speakers and guarantee that they will never assimilate and will reamain second class citizens.
They have to keep people crippled and needing entitlements so they can pander for their votes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.