Skip to comments.
The New “Highway Robbery”: Money-Making DUI Roadblocks Growing
Maricopa County Courts ^
| February 14, 2010
| Lawrence Taylor
Posted on 02/17/2010 8:16:37 AM PST by granite
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
California Cops Exploit DUI Checkpoints to Bring in Money for Cities, Police California police are turning DUI checkpoints into profitable operations that are far more likely to seize cars from unlicensed minority motorists than catch drunken drivers.
1
posted on
02/17/2010 8:16:37 AM PST
by
granite
To: granite
Are there any instances of innocent and totally sober people failing these tests and having property taken?
Not playing devil's advocate here, just curious.
2
posted on
02/17/2010 8:19:01 AM PST
by
wendy1946
To: granite
This should come as no surprise to anyone, once the fascists acquire ANY amount of power, they will never relinquish it.
“Ist your papers in order, Herr Citizen?”
And the sheeple all bleat “baaaaaaWOHL!”
3
posted on
02/17/2010 8:19:12 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(0bama squats to pee.)
To: wendy1946
Are there any instances of innocent and totally sober people failing these tests and having property taken? From the article: "See, for example, DUI Roadblock: 1131 Stops, 114 Tickets, 0 DUI Arrests, Another "Successful" DUI Roadblock: 3000 Drivers Stopped, 0 DUIs."
4
posted on
02/17/2010 8:24:39 AM PST
by
granite
("We dare not tempt them with weakness" - JFK)
To: wendy1946
Has happened before (other states) where cops would toss a baggie in a car then arrest the driver ... in Missouri the state cops were stopping people with Conservative bumper stickers or anti-Obama stickers ....
5
posted on
02/17/2010 8:25:37 AM PST
by
SkyDancer
(If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
To: wendy1946
We can have police officers stationed in your home just in case you decide to use illicit drugs.
If you never do, then you will never get arrested, so what's the worry?
To: granite
7
posted on
02/17/2010 8:27:47 AM PST
by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
To: mkjessup
Well, if you aren’t doing anything wrong you shouldn’t have anything to worry about. Right? I mean, asides from a government that ignores one of the most fundamental aspects of any free society, the right to travel about freely and without undue harassment by gun toting authorities.
8
posted on
02/17/2010 8:29:42 AM PST
by
RC one
(WHAT!!!!)
To: granite
The New Highway Robbery: Money-Making DUI Roadblocks Growing
I see potential for a new iPhone app.
9
posted on
02/17/2010 8:31:43 AM PST
by
Spirochete
(Texas is an anagram for Taxes)
To: Seruzawa
I don’t know what’s worse...the gormless cops who believe they are doing good or the MADD harpies who have outstayed their welcome.
To: granite
This highlights DUI stops as a means of illicit income but regular ol’ traffic stop for “violations” are just another means of providing “income” to the state.
Big Brother and all of his henchmen just want the income. They couldn’t care less about “public safety”.
We should work to change the law so that any traffic violation would result in mandatory jail time with no fine.
How many traffic tickets would get written?
To: granite
The US. Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. Sitz that although a DUI roadblock does constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment, the governmentalal interest in reducing drunk driving fatalities outweighs the "minimal intrusion" into a citizens constitutional rights.
There is a special place in he@@ waiting for those in SCOTUS that supported this ruling.
To: who_would_fardels_bear
Like I said, just curious, that's all.
We clearly need a few new items in the bill of rights, one of which should say that nobody ever profits by enforcing the law. Fines taken in by cop activities should be distributed to charities, and to charities in states OTHER than those in which the fine was levied, and preferably to international charities like Persecution Project or the Salvation Army.
To: granite
I think the importance of these roadblocks is that they are accepted by society. We have become desensitized to being strong armed by our overlords.
14
posted on
02/17/2010 8:36:53 AM PST
by
Pessimist
(u)
To: relictele
I dont know whats worse...the gormless cops who believe they are doing good or the MADD harpies who have outstayed their welcome.LOL!
That's like asking: Which is worse... Al Gore's books or Michael Moore's movies?
15
posted on
02/17/2010 8:37:15 AM PST
by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: wendy1946
You were saying ...
Are there any instances of innocent and totally sober people failing these tests and having property taken?
That might be interesting to find out, but it wouldn't matter in terms of this "goldmine" technique that is being used. It's obviously a "subterfuge" by police to "rake in the dough" for all sorts of other things.
And it sounds quite typical for the police and cities and their governments to do those sorts of things.
16
posted on
02/17/2010 8:37:17 AM PST
by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: granite
Cabs are cheaper than DUI.
To: Pessimist
You were saying ...
We have become desensitized to being strong armed by our overlords.
Well, I would put a finer touch on that and say that it's MADD that has been strong-arming people and the "overlords" in government saw a good thing for "revenue enchancement" when it fell into their laps... LOL...
18
posted on
02/17/2010 8:39:21 AM PST
by
Star Traveler
(Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
To: El Gran Salseron
Think of all the unrelated tickets they can write.
To: microgood
The US. Supreme Court ruled (your state) that seizing all private firearms does constitute a violation of the second a,endment,
the governmental interest in reducing accidental shootings outweighs the “minimal intrusion” into a citizens constitutional rights.
20
posted on
02/17/2010 8:42:16 AM PST
by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson