Posted on 01/31/2010 9:06:23 AM PST by opentalk
When a man is apprehended with a cache of weapons, body armor, a map of a military installation and jihadist personal effects, the natural response of most Americans is to assume the situation is terrorist-related. The Obama administration says otherwise.
Lloyd R. Woodson was arrested Jan. 25 in rural New Jersey. He had been observed behaving strangely, wearing military-style fatigues and a bulletproof vest. He had a weapon modified to fire .50-caliber rounds from beneath his jacket. He had a hotel room full of weapons and ammunition. Despite all these warning signs, the immediate response from the government was that this was "not a terrorism thing."
Bureaucratic lack of concern raises a critical question: If this is not the behavior of a terrorist, what is?
It's not clear what the Obama administration thinks terrorism is, if it thinks it exists at all. The administration doggedly maintains that political, especially jihadist, violence by individuals with no international linkage is not terrorism. This definition might come as a surprise to the Unabomber, who for years was the most sought-after terrorist in America.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
You can’t connect the dots when you’re part of the puzzle.
The only dots that oBama can connect are the sprinkles in his ice cream cone.
Exactly! Obama is doing all he can to protect his Muslim brothers/terrorists. This is what Obama’s decisions demonstrate. My question is: What are the Democrats gaining from Obama’s treason?
Interesting observations on the Taliban by that great American philosopher, Jeff Foxworthy.
“YOU MAY BE A TALIBAN IF...”
1. You refine heroin for a living, but you have a moral objection to liquor.
2. You own a $3,000 machine gun and $5,000 rocket launcher, but you can’t afford shoes.
3. You have more wives than teeth.
4. You wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider bacon “unclean.”
5. You think vests come in two styles: bullet-proof and suicide.
6. You can’t think of anyone you haven’t declared Jihad against.
7. You consider television dangerous, but routinely carry explosives in your clothing.
8. You were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses other than setting off roadside bombs.
9. You have nothing against women and think every man should own at least four.
10. You’ve always had a crush on your neighbor’s goat.
11. Your cousin is president of the United States
I really don’t think the administration understands yet how badly things are going to go for them if there is another terrorist attack on their watch. The do not understand the problem, and what’s more they seem to insist on remaining deliberately ignorant of it. This is unacceptable in the extreme, and they do not get any more strikes on this.
Check out Sonja’s take on The Usurper and terrorism. This is what an articulate (abeit scripted) leader is supposed to sound like:
He can’t connect the dots because Gibbs hid all the crayons.
Ping to #7 for link.
One would not want to connect the dots for action on his allies.
IMHO
... and his brothers.... of his “Christian” faith.
Taqiyya and nefarious plans.... nothing but.
All designed for the dhimininishing and marginalization culminating in the collapse of the US of A.
IMO
Obomba is a DOT!
“I really don’t think the administration understands yet how badly things are going to go for them if there is another terrorist attack on their watch.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I must assume that you mean another attack that kills thousands as there most certainly have been terrorist attacks on Obama’s watch already. That is why they are so insistent on pretending that terrorism is not really terrorism, they DO know that it is not going to help the Democrats any if we have another like 9-11 or worse.
We can assume nothing of Reason while Obama in 'power'; including what seems almost a coded invite to terrorists; and whether a terrorist should 'rsvp' - or not - think it a luxury of thought to assume an Election, 2012. .
And just as they consistently, do not name the 'terror'; so too, they constantly remind us with every defensive breath; that this is the way BUSH did it!
Oh, say can we see? Surely, we can.
Perfect!
Saudi's buying more of Fox is a move to squash any spotlight on Islam and terrorism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.