Posted on 01/22/2010 5:12:36 PM PST by george76
On Jan. 14, five days before the Massachusetts special election, President Obama was in full bring-it-on mode as he rallied House Democrats behind his health care reform. If Republicans want to campaign against what weve done by standing up for the status quo and for insurance companies over American families and businesses, that is a fight I want to have.
The bravado lasted three days. When Obama campaigned in Boston on Jan. 17 for Obamacare supporter Martha Coakley, not once did he mention the health care bill. When your candidate is sinking, you dont throw her a millstone.
After Coakleys defeat, Obama pretended that the real cause was a generalized anger and frustration not just because of whats happened in the last year or two years, but whats happened over the last eight years.
Lets get this straight: The antipathy to George W. Bush is so enduring and powerful that ... it just elected a Republican senator in Massachusetts? Why, the man is omnipotent.
And the Democrats are delusional: Scott Brown won by running against Obama, not Bush. He won by brilliantly nationalizing the race, running hard against the Obama agenda, most notably Obamacare. Killing it was his No. 1 campaign promise.
Bulls-eye. An astonishing 56 percent of Massachusetts voters, according to Rasmussen, called health care their top issue...78 percent of Brown voters said their vote was intended to stop Obamacare. Only a quarter of all voters in the Rasmussen poll cited the economy as their top issue, nicely refuting the Democratic view that Massachusetts was just the usual anti-incumbent resentment you expect in bad economic times.
Brown ran on a very specific, very clear agenda. Stop health care. Dont Mirandize terrorists. Dont raise taxes; cut them. And no more secret backroom deals with special interests.
(Excerpt) Read more at sentinelsource.com ...
>> Lets get this straight: The antipathy to George W. Bush is so enduring and powerful that ...
LOL, Scott’s win is Bush’s fault.
Krauthamer for Pres...
Go back to sleep ‘Rats. You just had a bad dream. That’s all. A bad dream. Go back to sleep. (chortle)
I second that!
Yep, they nailed me to a "T".
I hope the GOP heard what the SCOTUS ruled. They just gave us freedom of speech.
Oh, I forgot, McCain, the scumbag RINO, tried to take it away.
Here’s the link on Digg. Please digg this up!
Charles said it all and echoed all of us too I am sure.
Zero is radioactive. He is now 0-3 in backing Dem candidates. Come this summer’s primaries, he will be persona non grada.
Amazingly, I think Krauthammer has actually misjudged the nature and extent of this sentiment. Certainly the tea party movement defines some of the energy, but it cannot explain why Brown also won in Barney Frank's district.
If my wife (who is not conservative) is any guide, the real energy comes from those in the middle-to-left who have a) realized that the nation is on a suicidal course; and b) who have become utterly cynical about the politicians who want to fool us into believing otherwise.
Put another way, these people are the same demographic who formed the Reagan Democrats back in the 80s. They are the fabled swing vote, if we can only craft and live up to a message that attracts them.
It's a real opportunity, if conservatives can give up their tunnel-vision RINO-hating idiocies.
Uh-oh, here comes trouble. Good luck, r9etb.
Uhhhh...don't we have some of that here?
Well, what can I say ... I'll call self-destructive behavior by name. I've never seen so many delusional conservatives in my life, as have sprouted on FR threads over the last year.
I'd much rather win half a political victory than lose an entire political war.
Hopefully the last rain storm has left out here.
Now that's a crazy idea. Krauthamer was an unabashed cheerler for the Bernanke/Bush/Obama bank bailouts and Fed inflation and this is thus part of the problem not the solution.
Now that's a crazy idea. Krauthammer was an unabashed cheerleader for the Bernanke/Bush/Obama bank bailouts and Fed inflation and is thus part of the problem not the solution.
What was his position regarding the forced lending policies of bwawnie fwank? THERE is the root of the problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.