Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 1/19/10

Scribd ^ | 1/20/2010 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.

[rxsid]

"but many people can focus on various tasks at once. It is not an “either/or” situation."

True indeed!

[the long march]

weather??? as in whether....at any rate. you have deliberately twisted any and all argunmentation. Fact is yes I care about the constitution but I also understand which battles can be won and which cannot. Go ahead and bang you drum slowly. Let us all know when the lights have been turned out.

[the long march]

you seem strangely obsessed with a losing position

when I find that I have fallen into a hole, I find it best to FIRST stop diggin

[the long march]

Yeah good luck with that argument.

[little jeremiah]

Your purpose is to throw cold water on the topic of 0bama’s constitutional eligibility to hold the post of President.

I am wondering why.

Solid trustworthy freepers I know who think it’s more important to elect conservatives and vote 0bama out, and not worry about his eligibility, don’t even post on these threads.

They’re busy doing the things they deem worthwhile.

Yet you and your ilk, hang out on these threads dissing everyone who is concerned, and your excuse is that other aveneues are better to puruse.

Why the hell aren’t you busy pursuing other avenues? You’re wasting your time on a “losing” issue (trying to make it a losing issue is more like it).

You and the others like you are contradicting your very arguments by even posting on these threads.

Your very purpose is to paint those concerned with Constitutional eligibility as nuts and kooks.

I wonder why, it is obviously not because you want to further the conservative cause, or you’d be busy doing that.

[rxsid]

FYI - Mario and Charles have been on blogtalk radio recently:

Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate - Wed, 20 Jan 2010, 9:30 p.m. EST
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2010/01/21/revolution-radio-the-unconstitutional-obama

 

Thursday, January 21, 2010
Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Let's Talk Liberty Radio Show hosted by Chalice Jackson - Thurs, 21 Jan 2010, 9:15 p.m. EST
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/patriotsheartnetwork/2010/01/22/lets-talk-liberty

[rxsid]

yeah, i certainly have never been accused of being the worlds best speller (or even close to it). Guess that's what I get for relying on my "spell checker" far too much. Unfortunately, it doesn't have a grammar check, or an "intent" check. Guess when that's about all you've got to joust with...you go with it.

And yeah, I will continue to bang [that] drum slowly. I'm capable of multitasking.

"Let us all know when the lights have been turned out.

On Barry currently usurping the Constitution? Will do.

[rxsid]

Excellent points! Great post.

[the long march]

Presumptive on your part. I am throwing cold water on nothing. I am stating what will inevitably happen to this ‘case’. Discuss it all you wish but do not delude yourself.

I and my ilk -— I guess that means you too since here you are posting-— oh but you only mean the folks who disagree with you. Okay so be it. Since it is FR I was under the silly notion that I was allowed to post my opinion even if it disagrees with yours

[the long march]

See post #49

[little jeremiah]

Yes - you, the great seer of future events are stating the facts about the future. Yes indeed.

Your ilk means those who haunt the threads about 0bama’s ineligibility and post exactly what you are posting here - we’re kooks, you know the future, it’s all hopeless and useless and oh, by the way, Orly is nuts (and so are we...).

And for a bonus point, you’re accusing me of saying you shouldn’t be allowed to post your baseless and defeatist opinion. Which I did not say; I merely disagree with you.

If people who haunt these threads and state over and over and over and over again that “this” will never go anywhere, instead put their energy and valuable time on the other efforts to defeat 0bama that they and you say are the only avenues worth following, then we’d all be further ahead.

But no, posting on these threads saying it’s all useless, hopeless, and oh, by the way, Orly is a nutcase, is the method. Method of something or other, but it for sure doesn’t help get 0bama out of office!

[little jeremiah]

Isn’t “The Long March” what Mao did when the commies took over China?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_March

http://www.google.com/search?q=The+Long+March&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Hey, long march - why did you choose as a screen name something commemorating and glorifying the commie takeover of China?

[little jeremiah]

You seem strangely obsessed with infusing a defeatist attitude on 0bama’s eligibility discussions.

[the long march]

Of course the long march is also a reference by the Navaho ( the Dine) to the walk to and from Redono pueblo. I chose a name that honors my father and his people. I am neither Chinese nor communist.

Interesting that one devolves to this type of name calling when you have nothing left of logic

[the long march]

You are amazingly able to read into my posts things I have NEVER said

[Non-Sequitur]

Who was harmed? Chrysler dealers.

Then sue Chrysler.

[Non-Sequitur]

Solid trustworthy freepers I know who think it’s more important to elect conservatives and vote 0bama out, and not worry about his eligibility, don’t even post on these threads.

And here you are.

[little jeremiah]

Thank you for the explanation of your screen name.

I apologize for my misunderstanding, and admit my grave mistake.

Apolgies also to your father and his ancestors, and I say this in all sincerity.

[the long march]

Fair enough. I understand it is easy to make the other illusion.

[Puzo1]

The Chinese reference is a “march” and the Navajo (or Navaho) one is a “walk.”

Here is the “march:” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_March

Here is the “walk:” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Walk_of_the_Navajo