Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 1/19/10

Scribd ^ | 1/20/2010 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.

[rxsid]

Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 19 Jan 2010

Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed the Appellant's Opening Brief in the Kerchner et al v Obama et al lawsuit appeal. The Brief was filed with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA. See this link to download and read it: http://www.scribd.com/doc/25461132/Kerchner-v-Obama-Appeal-Appellant-s-Opening-Brief-FILED-2010-01-19

We look forward to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reviewing this matter and ordering a trial on the merits as to the Article II Constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the military.

We say Obama is not a "natural born Citizen" of the USA and thus is not eligible to serve in the Oval Office. Obama is a Usurper and must be removed to preserve the integrity and fundamental law of our Constitution and our Republic.

"We the People" will be heard on this matter! As the People in Massachusetts have demonstrated, "We the People" are the Sovereigns in this country and the Constitution is the fundamental law of our nation, not Obama or Congress. We will not be silenced. The chair Obama sits in in the Oval Office is not his throne. It is the People's seat too. And Obama despite all his obfuscations to date must prove to Constitutional standards that he is eligible to sit in that seat.

This is not going to go away until Obama stops hiding ALL his hidden and sealed early life documents and provides original copies of them to a controlling legal authority and reveals his true legal identity from the time he was born until the time he ran for President. Obama at birth was born British and a dual-citizen. He holds and has held multiple citizenship during his life-time. He's a Citizenship chameleon as the moment and time in his life suited him and he is not a "natural born Citizen" with sole allegiance and Unity of Citizenship at Birth to the USA as is required per the Constitution per the intent of our founders and the meaning of the term "natural born Citizen" to Constitutional standards.

Attorney Apuzzo will comment more on this Appellant's Brief in the next few days.

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress
http://www.protectourliberty.org

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/kerchner-v-obama-appeal-appellants.html

[rxsid]

I would add...

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?

 

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

 

 

Furthermore:  Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaii birth certificate.

[rxsid]

Ping!

"Kerchner v Obama & Congress - U.S. 3rd Circuit Appeal - Appellant's Opening Brief - Filed 1/19/10"

[Genoa]

Maybe he’s in enough political trouble now that he will be considered unuseful, and someone will decide to let this go forward.

[rxsid]

Certainly possible. Prior to 1/20/09, and even shortly thereafter...nobody in a position of power wanted to touch this "hot potato." Now? Tides could be turning!

[faucetman]

You can get a pretty nice Hut in Kenya on Obama’s retirement salary.

[circumbendibus]

Excellent letter by Charles Kerchner. I hope Wall Street Journal or Fox News will report this. Great news on top of Brown Massachusetts massacre. Now's the time to pile on and squash Obama like a bug. He must be outed and removed. Quo warranto, baby.

Waiting for Donofrio to join the party. The tide is turning.

[STARWISE]

~~PING!

[freekitty]

From Queen to hut living; I don’t think Michelle is going to go for it. Where would she wear all of her finery?

[the long march]

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, ...”

When an article or brief starts out FACTUALLY WRONG, I tend to discount anything else that is written. Hawaii in fact became a US STATE in August of 1959 TWO YEARS before Obama was born ( wherever that may have occured)

[tutstar]

bump

[UCANSEE2]

(the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaii birth certificate.

NO ONE has (to my knowledge) ever asked WHY HAWAII would set such a law.

Laws do not just 'happen'. There is always a reason.

What good purpose would such a law serve? What was the reasoning behind that law?

[bgill]

until Obama stops hiding ALL his hidden and sealed early life documents and provides original copies of them to a controlling legal authority and reveals his true legal identity from the time he was born until the time he ran for President.

Who is the controlling legal authority? We trusted the DNC to present an eligible candidate and we relied on the GOP to vet the opposition, yet no one stepped up to the duty or fudged documentation.

[barnieca]

What is factually wrong???

NOTHING.. He never said Hawaii wasn’t a state.. Move along Obot.

[Canadian Outrage]

It’s my understanding that Hawaii issued “Certificates of Live Birth” NOT a Birth Certificate. One would only need to present a living breathing baby to be able to be issued the Certificate of Live Birth. These two things aren’t the same as I understand it. CO

[rxsid]

"(the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaii birth certificate.

NO ONE has (to my knowledge) ever asked WHY HAWAII would set such a law.

Laws do not just 'happen'. There is always a reason.

What good purpose would such a law serve? What was the reasoning behind that law?"

--------------------------------------------------

For a very simple, "in a nutshell" start...FOLLOW THE MONEY!

For further reading...an excellent reason can be found here. Other reasons have been discussed by many other FReepers as well. The reason's abound.

Bottom line, any and all reasons aside, the fact remains...HI did have such a law in place in 1961 (specifically), and long before that as well.

[the long march]

You bet anyone who doesn’t agree with your viewpoint has to be an Obot.

I know all you folks get really excited about Obama being born somewhere else but I will say again it makes no difference at this point. We can try and pass legislation at the state level to prevent it from ever happening again but SCOTUS is NEVER going to agree with you

[Frantzie]

This has been discussed before. Hawaii is a welfare state. They loaded the state up with people from other countries in the 1960s to get govt money. Probably lots of illegals for agriculture too. It was really a plantation for liberal white elites.

Send the Haitians there.

[rxsid]

"It’s my understanding that Hawaii issued “Certificates of Live Birth” NOT a Birth Certificate"

They actually issued birth certificates...check it out:

Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I"

[rxsid]

"“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, ...”

When an article or brief starts out FACTUALLY WRONG, I tend to discount anything else that is written. Hawaii in fact became a US STATE in August of 1959 TWO YEARS before Obama was born ( wherever that may have occured)"

----------------------------------------

Where's the "factual" inaccuracy in that article (or brief) regarding the time-line you mention?

[kiltie65]

He won’t be going to Kenya when he gets booted out. My prediction, he’ll have to go to somewhere (Rio?) where he can’t be extradited.