Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voting Democrat Causes Cancer
American Thinker ^ | 1-15-2010 | Randall Hoven

Posted on 01/14/2010 10:25:18 PM PST by smoothsailing


Return to the Article


January 15, 2010

Voting Democrat Causes Cancer

By Randall Hoven

Voting Democrat is associated with over 150,000 cancer deaths every year, according to the Hoven Institute for Studies Just as Valid as Studies Cited by Democrats.

To help visualize the data used in the study, consider the two maps below. In the first, high cancer rates are indicated by red and low ones by blue. In the second map, counties that voted for George W. Bush in 2000 are indicated by red, and those that voted for Al Gore are indicated by blue.


Source: National Cancer Institute.


Source: USA Today.

The above maps appear to be roughly the inverse of each other. That is, locations that voted for Al Gore tended to suffer higher cancer rates.

To analyze this phenomenon more rigorously, the Hoven study looked at the cancer mortality rate and the percentage of 2000 presidential votes going to Al Gore for each of the fifty states. The result is shown in the figure below, which also includes the linear regression trend line. The slope of that line is 1.24 cancer deaths per 100,000 person-years for every percentage of vote going to Al Gore.



The correlation coefficient between cancer mortality and votes for Al Gore is 0.594. That is statistically significant from zero when taken over the fifty states. In fact, the 95% confidence interval on the slope of the trend line is 1.241 + 0.014, indicating that voting Democrat is associated with at least 1.22 cancer deaths per 100,000 person-years.

Also, the 0.594 correlation coefficient indicates that about 35% of cancer mortality is "explained" by voting Democrat. (The amount of explanation is the square of the correlation coefficient.) Thus, not all cancers are caused by voting Democrat.

The Hoven study concluded that "[v]oting Democrat is associated with cancer mortality."  This is similar to the conclusion of the study "Health Insurance and Mortality in US Adults," cited by Democrats in support of their version of health care reform. That latter study concluded that "[u]ninsurance is associated with mortality."

However, one of the co-authors of that latter study, Dr. David Himmelstein, went farther in an interview with CNN. He said that if a person is uninsured, "it means that you're at mortal risk." As CNN summed it up, "45,000 deaths per year in the United States are associated with the lack of health insurance." The implication from both Dr. Himmelstein and CNN is that not only is there correlation between insurance and mortality, but also causation: Not having insurance causes you to die.

From the Hoven study, the mortality rate could be reduced by 1.24 deaths per 100,000 person-years for every percentage of the vote not going Democrat. Barack Obama won with 53% of the vote, which means the cancer mortality rate could be reduced by almost 66 -- or from the current U.S. average of 209 to about 143 deaths per 100,000 person-years -- if everyone refused to vote Democrat. That is a reduction of over 30% in cancer deaths. Given that there are over 500,000 cancer deaths in the U.S. every year, over 150,000 cancer deaths could be averted by not voting Democrat.

By applying the same logic in interpreting both studies, three times as many lives could be saved by no one voting Democrat as by providing universal health insurance.

Harry Reid said, "On average, an American dies from lack of health insurance every ten minutes." If he can say that, then I can say, "On average, an American dies from voting Democrat every 3.5 minutes." Both statements are equally valid.

(Unlike certain climate scientists, Hoven provides data sources and methods used in his study.)

Source of 2000 election results: Federal Election Commission.

Source of cancer mortality rates: National Cancer Institute.

Methods: correlation, hypothesis-testing, and confidence limit calculations found in most elementary probability and statistics textbooks. Hoven used Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, by Ronald E. Walpole and Raymond H. Myers (Macmillan Publishing Co., 1972).

Randall Hoven can be contacted at randall.hoven@gmail.com or via his website, randallhoven.com.


Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/voting_democrat_causes_cancer.html at January 15, 2010 - 01:19:42 AM EST


TOPICS: Editorial; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/14/2010 10:25:21 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
this article reminds me of a joke

You know you are a Californian when "coming out of the closet" means admitting to voting republican. ...

I wll read this later I have to go to bed :(

2 posted on 01/14/2010 10:29:16 PM PST by lmarie373 (*These little guys might look cute and cuddly, but trust us: they will kill you.-on emanuel brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

VOTE DEMOCRAT....KILL America!


3 posted on 01/14/2010 10:29:57 PM PST by goodnesswins (Become a Precinct Committee Person/Officer....in the GOP...or do NOT complain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

It starts in their brains.


4 posted on 01/14/2010 10:32:37 PM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Conservatives are meat eaters.

Lefties are anti-meat eaters.

At least as a generality...


5 posted on 01/14/2010 10:38:23 PM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

LOL


6 posted on 01/14/2010 10:42:04 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmarie373

Well, hell, then. I’ve been out of the closet since I was 18 (32 years). Never been very good at being PC.


7 posted on 01/14/2010 10:47:48 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier whose wife is expecting twins SONS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I’m not sure about cancer, but voting liberal results in mental illness.


8 posted on 01/14/2010 10:48:30 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier whose wife is expecting twins SONS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

It looks as if there may be a correlation with population density, too. The more dense the population, the more likely they are to vote Democrat...


9 posted on 01/14/2010 11:16:05 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I guess this explains why they want universal health care so badly.

The premiums must be "killing" them.

10 posted on 01/14/2010 11:34:15 PM PST by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
The more dense the population, the more likely they are to vote Democrat...

The more dense the population, the more dense the voter...

11 posted on 01/14/2010 11:39:10 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
LL!

12 posted on 01/14/2010 11:41:49 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voters: "Here's my DeathCARE Plan"...now....just die (quicky), please. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; fieldmarshaldj; Arthur Wildfire! March; Clintonfatigued; NFHale; darkangel82

It figures, the dems ARE a cancer themselves on our body politic. A big rectal tumor.


13 posted on 01/15/2010 12:16:00 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing; fieldmarshaldj; Arthur Wildfire! March; Clintonfatigued; NFHale; darkangel82; ...

It figures, the dems ARE a cancer themselves on our body politic. A big rectal tumor.


14 posted on 01/15/2010 12:16:07 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Correlation is not causation, but it’s still funny.


15 posted on 01/15/2010 12:33:57 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Depressed, dependent, chronically angry people are more prone to cancer.

Hence the correlation.


16 posted on 01/15/2010 1:18:54 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H. L. Menken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmarie373
You know you are a Californian when "coming out of the closet" means admitting to voting republican. ...

As a native Californian, and one who votes Republican, I can tell you that this is truer than you know.

17 posted on 01/15/2010 1:52:47 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
...radiation ruling the nation... Thanks smoothsailing et al.
18 posted on 01/15/2010 4:26:44 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; smoothsailing; fieldmarshaldj; Arthur Wildfire! March; Clintonfatigued; darkangel82

“...Voting Democrat Causes Cancer...”

...for every country, state, and county they touch.

The sooner that party is broken up, jailed, and otherwise neutered (or spayed), the better for this Republic.

They should be called the Treasonous Communist Bastard Party.

[sarc] Or am I being too harsh? [/sarc]


19 posted on 01/15/2010 9:00:47 AM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NFHale; Impy; All

“That is, locations that voted for Al Gore tended to suffer higher cancer rates.”

If you study motivation/behavior books [examples such as Napoleon Hill, Robert Schuller, and Tony Robbins] you easilly conclude that people are healthier if they have a good attitude about prosperity and freedom.

I’m not saying it always works that way, but it does improve the odds.


20 posted on 01/15/2010 11:35:16 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Ayers unimportant? What about Robert KKK Byrd or FALN pardons? DNC -- the terrorism party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson