Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't be fooled by Palin [Another Lefty responds to her WaPo article]
The London Guardian / The Washington Post ^ | December 11, 2009 | Alan Leshner, CEO, American Ass. for the Advancement of Science

Posted on 12/12/2009 12:28:58 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Don't be fooled about climate science. In April 1994 – long after scientists had clearly demonstrated the addictive quality and devastating health impacts of cigarette smoking – seven chief executives of major tobacco companies denied the evidence, swearing in a US congressional hearing that nicotine was not addictive.

Now, the American public is again being subjected to those kinds of denials, this time about global climate change. While former Alaska governor Sarah Palin wrote in her recent opinion essay that she did not deny the "reality of some changes in climate," she distorted the clear scientific evidence that Earth's climate is changing, largely as a result of human behaviours. She also badly confused the concepts of daily weather changes and long-term climate trends when she wrote that "while we recognise the occurrence of these natural, cyclical environmental trends, we can't say with assurance that man's activities cause weather changes." Her statement inaccurately suggests that short-term weather fluctuations must be consistent with long-term climate patterns. And it is the long-term patterns that are a cause for concern.

Climate-change science is clear: the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide – derived mostly from the human activities of fossil-fuel burning and deforestation – stands at 389 parts per million (ppm). We know from studying ancient Antarctic ice cores that this concentration is higher than it has been for at least the past 650,000 years. Exhaustive measurements tell us that atmospheric carbon dioxide is rising by two ppm every year and that the global temperature has increased by about 1.1 degrees fahrenheit over the past century. Multiple lines of other evidence, including reliable thermometer readings since the 1880s, reveal a clear warming trend. The broader impacts of climate change range from rapidly melting glaciers and rising sea levels to shifts in species ranges.(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agw; climaquiddick; climatechange; climategate; globalwarming; gorebullwarming; jourbalism; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
If she's a "washed-up quitter" and a "loser" why is everyone from Mr. Obama, Gore, Reid and on down putting up so much of a fight to get you to disbelieve her?
1 posted on 12/12/2009 12:28:58 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

C4P already destroyed this article.


2 posted on 12/12/2009 12:31:31 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (10 YEARS OF FREEPING! HAPPY ANNIVERSARY EEE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/12/science-editor-beclowns-himself-while.html


3 posted on 12/12/2009 12:35:06 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Alan Leshner, CEO, American Ass for the Advancement of Science

Says it all right there, doesn't it?
4 posted on 12/12/2009 12:37:35 PM PST by GQuagmire ( Driving a Prius doesn't make you Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
" Her statement inaccurately suggests that short-term weather fluctuations must be consistent with long-term climate patterns."

Do these libtarsds not know that climate is simply the average of weather over a period of time for a given location? If the weather changes over time, then guess what, so does the climate. Weather drives the climate, not the other way away.

Libtards are morons.

5 posted on 12/12/2009 12:39:41 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Poor lefties, can’t stand the fact that their global warming BS has turned into nothing more then just a bunch of BS


6 posted on 12/12/2009 12:39:44 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

away = around.

Opps...


7 posted on 12/12/2009 12:40:36 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This idiot is a Global Warming Hoax denier.


8 posted on 12/12/2009 12:40:37 PM PST by Mark (Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The notion that carbon dioxide is causing a warming trend is still speculative.


9 posted on 12/12/2009 12:43:29 PM PST by popdonnelly (Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In April 1994 – long after scientists had clearly demonstrated the addictive quality and devastating health impacts of cigarette smoking – seven chief executives of major tobacco companies denied the evidence, swearing in a US congressional hearing that nicotine was not addictive.

This isn't an argument that will convince anyone. Other than, perhaps, the low-ranking galley slaves still remaining below decks, who are beginning to notice that a good number of their fellow-rowers have deserted their positions, and the slave-driver who used to call the stroke seems to have taken a powder as well.

10 posted on 12/12/2009 12:43:32 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Exactly!


11 posted on 12/12/2009 12:44:07 PM PST by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Jeez, just in the first three paragraphs Alan Leshner violates every principle the scientific method requires for an idea to be CONSIDERED for evaluation, let alone theory or repeatable proof by proper experimental test. Plus he throws in a straw man credibility test.

Confabulation.

Coincidence proves cause and effect. Not.

Coincidence disproves reversed cause and effect. Not

Demonization.

Ridicule.

Alan Leshner brilliantly deploys the tools of the scientific method.

12 posted on 12/12/2009 12:48:28 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In April 1994 – long after scientists had clearly demonstrated the addictive quality and devastating health impacts of cigarette smoking – seven chief executives of major tobacco companies denied the evidence, swearing in a US congressional hearing that nicotine was not addictive.

What a stupid argument. This has nothing to do with anything. This is kind of like starting an article talking about NAZI's.

13 posted on 12/12/2009 12:49:09 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
– seven chief executives of major tobacco companies denied the evidence, swearing in a US congressional hearing that nicotine was not addictive.

I don't know how they define "addictive" now days, but back then caffeine and nicotine were not addictive according to the definition at the time.

The big lie about smoking and second hand smoke continues to this day.

I don't think global warning will ever go away. These people will stick to the lie and little by little convince average people and the children that it is true, just like they did with smoking.

We are doomed to be under the control of anti-smoking and global warming brainwashed dictators.

14 posted on 12/12/2009 12:49:36 PM PST by donna ( I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth. - Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

Looks like the poster of the article intentionally used “Ass” as an abbreviation for association. It sure fits with the author of the Palin bashing article, doesn’t it?

LOL!!!!


15 posted on 12/12/2009 12:49:48 PM PST by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“C4P already destroyed this article.”

And very well, too! Read the idiocy in the Guardian reply section- they are bursting with Palin hatred. There has got to be something in the water over there! They ought to worry more abut getting flooded by Islamofascists than by melting glaciers;)


16 posted on 12/12/2009 12:50:22 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Opps...

Do you mean oops?

17 posted on 12/12/2009 12:51:07 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We know from studying ancient Antarctic ice cores...

Those ice-cores, they can be used not only to measure the atmospheric carbon dioxide in ages gone by, but also ancient temperatures. Let's have a look at what they say - once again that fantastic web-site of Anthony Watts, Watts Up With That, tells the story:

Our unprecedented global warming

Phhhhttt.

18 posted on 12/12/2009 12:52:09 PM PST by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
well .. unless there is a secret planet somewhere I don't know about that all the rich oil people live on that the rest of us don't, I don't see how lying about man made global warming helps them.

On the other hand, it is very much in the interest of global warming proponents to push this, even if it is a lie.

19 posted on 12/12/2009 12:52:29 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied, the economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

LOL!!! You got me!!!


20 posted on 12/12/2009 12:52:57 PM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson