LOL...way to try and explain away evolution’s GIGANTIC failures. Creationists said that what the evos assumed was “junk” would prove functional. Evos wrong, creationists right, as per usual. The evos predicted darwood’s so-called ‘tree of life’, creationists predicted a ‘forest’ or ‘orchard’ of life. Creationists were proven correct, the evos were dead wrong, as per usual. Creationists point out that the only empirically verifiable source of the complex, specified, digital codes (such as DNA) is intelligent designers. The evos bury their collective heads in the sand. Par for the course. Many more examples could be given.
The vast majority of the genome has not proven to be functional at all. Still no known function.
Creationists in no way shape or form predicted that all species were related by common descent; all the “tree” or “shrub” talk is predicated on the same idea of common descent.
Creationists know nothing of DNA, they don't work with DNA, they don't understand DNA, they don't perform research on DNA. Your “Creation Safari” source you like to post from doesn’t even understand the difference between transcription and translation.
All you can do is misrepresent science, and, like your cowardly cohorts, run away with your hands over your ears in mortal fear that you might actually learn something about the subject you talk about day after day, while repeating the same misrepresentations.
What he isn't saying is that he believes that he is proven when he declares himself the winner in the competition of ideas. How ironic that he says believes in the natural selection of ideas but reverts to fabrication and self deception to avoid confronting it.