Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top House Democrat (Ike Skelton) questions 9/11 criminal trial
Reuters ^ | November 20, 2009 | Jeremy Pelofsky and Chris Wilson

Posted on 11/20/2009 7:33:17 PM PST by reaganaut1

The chairman of the U.S. House Armed Services Committee, Representative Ike Skelton, cast doubt on Friday about the Obama administration's decision to try the September 11, 2001, conspirators in a U.S. criminal court.

Skelton, a fellow Democrat of President Barack Obama, asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Defense Secretary Robert Gates to brief the committee about the decision to use the criminal courts instead of the revamped military commissions.

"As a former prosecutor, I am not yet convinced that the right decision was made in these cases, nor that the presumption in favor of federal criminal trials over military tribunals for these detainees should continue," Skelton said in a letter to the two officials.

Holder this week defended his decision to move the trials of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-professed mastermind of the September 11 attacks, and four other alleged conspirators to a federal criminal court in New York from military commissions.

It has been mostly Republicans who have been critical of Holder's decision, questioning whether it will be easier to get a conviction in a criminal court rather than a military one because some of the evidence was obtained through coercive interrogations and probably cannot be used.

Holder has said he is aware of evidence that has not been made public that will help convict the five accused men. He expressed confidence that the trials would be successful.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; US: Missouri; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: holder; ikeskelton; ksmtrial; skelton
Good for Skelton. Republicans should try to block civillian trials for KSM and other terrorists in Gitmo, and they could succeed if enough Democrats join them.
1 posted on 11/20/2009 7:33:19 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Skelton, a fellow Democrat of President Barack Obama, asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Defense Secretary Robert Gates to brief the committee about the decision to use the criminal courts instead of the revamped military commissions. "As a former prosecutor, I am not yet convinced that the right decision was made in these cases, nor that the presumption in favor of federal criminal trials over military tribunals for these detainees should continue," Skelton said in a letter to the two officials.

2 posted on 11/20/2009 7:40:09 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

>> Good for Skelton.

Whatever.

Will he be voting for the end of our liberty as we know it?


3 posted on 11/20/2009 7:40:40 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Ike is worried about the next election. Despite his winning impressively last time this time will be different and Ike knows it.


4 posted on 11/20/2009 7:42:16 PM PST by jwalsh07 (Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what you can do for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
It has been mostly Republicans who have been critical of Holder's decision, questioning whether it will be easier to get a conviction in a criminal court rather than a military one because some of the evidence was obtained through coercive interrogations and probably cannot be used.

Once again Reuters gets it miserably wrong! Republicans, and other thinking humans, recognize that these people are illegal enemy combatants and are NOT entitled to protection under the Constitution or by the US court system? It has nothing to do with where an EASIER conviction could be had......

5 posted on 11/20/2009 7:43:24 PM PST by eeriegeno (<p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeriegeno

He is scared of his relection


6 posted on 11/20/2009 7:51:49 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Your damned right he is....because we here in Mid-MO are fed up with him.

There is a lot of plotting right now here in Jeff City, and we are going to put up a viable opponent this cycle.

Watch.


7 posted on 11/20/2009 7:58:30 PM PST by Ethrane ("semper consolar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Skelton has to go. He sits in a very Republican district, and he’s a Democrap . We can do better than him.


8 posted on 11/20/2009 7:59:14 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Have you seen Ike? I don’t think he has many elections left in him. While I would never vote for him, he’s always seemed like a decent man. At least as decent a person as a democrat congressman can be.


9 posted on 11/20/2009 7:59:29 PM PST by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

I’m pretty sure he voted against the health care monstrosity.


10 posted on 11/20/2009 8:00:04 PM PST by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Good idea to invite Holder and Gates both to “brief” the committee.

As someone pointed out a couple of days ago, it’s not clear that Holder has a legal right to take this terrorist away from the Military and try him in a civilian court, UNLESS Secretary Gates agrees.

Well, Gates seems to be happy enough pimping for Obama. But at least let’s put the S.O.B. on record whether or not he agrees to the change of venue.


11 posted on 11/20/2009 8:06:36 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My American political science is weak, so I’m a little confused. Who does the military actually report to? It’s the Sec.Of Defense, isn’t it? I assume the AG actually reports to the prez? How can the AG demand the military hand over THEIR prisoners? What would happen if the Sec.Of Defense refused to hand them over? Wouldn’t that force blame to Obama, rather than on the AG as it seems to sit now? Pretty interesting battle behind doors, I would imagine.


12 posted on 11/20/2009 8:17:57 PM PST by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativebuckeye
This is the pending vote I'm referring to:

Saturday Vote to Ration Health Care, Fine Any Without Insurance(Political Suicide Bombers)
13 posted on 11/20/2009 8:40:37 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CanaGuy
How can the AG demand the military hand over THEIR prisoners? What would happen if the Sec.Of Defense refused to hand them over? Wouldn’t that force blame to Obama, rather than on the AG as it seems to sit now?

Funny you should mention that...

14 posted on 11/20/2009 11:31:14 PM PST by Slings and Arrows ("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson