Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Afghan strategy 'not working'
bbc ^

Posted on 08/31/2009 1:25:00 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: rbg81

You had better be careful. Whenever we cut and run, it makes it that much harder for us to succeed in the future.


i admit cut and run may not be the best solution for the future but what alternative do “we” really have in afghanistan right now? and more important how do we succeed in Afghanistan anyway? right now the troops are fighting the Taliban, Local Warlords... and for what? the government we protect right now (from the Taliban) just passed a law
that you are allowed to legal starve your wife if she refuses sex for example.Or Do you know how frustrating it is (i have been “gunner” behind “my” cal. 50 in an APC) to drive around and watch people working on the Poppy fields (which you are not even allowed to enter let alone to destroy) knowing that the drugs will be used to kill our kids at home and the money from that will be used to buy weapons to shoot at you here. because both the Taliban and the government are big in the drug buissness. that people “vote” for the guy (mostly local drug lords) who is able to pay them the most or just for every one their local clan elder desides. btw. the day we leave this “democrazy” will implode anyway because Aghanistan is a tribal society.
and i could go on and on.So this is for what the troops have to die for?


21 posted on 08/31/2009 4:59:35 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

The Afghanis need to be protected from Islam.


22 posted on 08/31/2009 5:13:27 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

The Afghanis need to be protected from Islam.


and we do that how? Kill all of them? because the standart Afghanis are hardcore islamists so they definitely don´t want protection from Islam (the Taliban are just the top lunatics of all this radical madman). but as said they don´t differ that much as you might think. they believe in child marriage and treating wifes worse then cattle... this is how they (at least most of the male) whant to live.


23 posted on 08/31/2009 5:21:33 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

That’s kind of the point of my Post #18. We always seem to tie our own hands with this self defeating nonsense.

The way you win wars is you kill & exhaust the enemy until he has no more will to resist. Somewhere along the line we forgot that in the 20th Century. If we used our overwhelming firepower, we could win the war quickly, but it would not be pretty. Instead, we create these fairy tell policies for the sake of good PR. In short, we care more about being liked & PR than victory. Its the loser who decides when the war is over—not the winner.


24 posted on 08/31/2009 5:24:58 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

......we care more about being liked & PR than victory......

Meanwhile in Pakistan, drones eradicate leaders on a fairly consistent basis.


25 posted on 08/31/2009 5:28:03 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . fasl el-khital)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bert

Yeah, but ultimately these are pinprick strikes. If you have an instance where pinprick strikes brought victory, please share it.


26 posted on 08/31/2009 5:30:49 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

Maybe our visionary leader, BO, needs another vision.


27 posted on 08/31/2009 6:08:51 AM PDT by Malesherbes (Sauve Qui Peut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

Well i guess this stongly depends on the final “goal” what we are fighting for. If the goal has been to fight Al Quaida then “we” are already done in afghanistan since years. because i guess 99% of the enemy our troops kill right now have nothing to do with Al Quaida. (of course this does not prevent terrorists from returning to Afghanistan “or of course many other places in this world” after we have left). But if the goal is to make Afghanistan a more or less “civilized” society where the “government” could/would prevent terrorists or other extremists to settle i guarantee you that this is impossible in Afghanistan. Because as said the place we call Afghanistan is not even something what you could call a country. it´s made of different tribes (who did nothing else than fight and kill each other “if there had been no forreign army to fight against at the moment” for centuries) who share some common space in this Hell hole we call country. so even if we would flatten this hell hole it would not solve the terrorist problem because after we depopulated the whole area how would we hinder terrorists to settle again? so the result would be that we would have killed millions of people (who are no dirrect danger to our countries “only” because they want to live their “way” of live in this cesspool). and in the long run it would have solved nothing because the real “terrorists” can settle there again anytime they want.


28 posted on 08/31/2009 6:09:51 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

Odds are that this venture will not end well.


29 posted on 08/31/2009 6:18:27 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity
Odds are that this venture will not end well.

____________________________________________

I will be more certain in my prediction....It is guaranteed that this venture will not end well.

Nobody has ever conquered and held the Afghans, not since Ghenghis Khan.

The Brits at the peak of their imperial strength couldn't.

The Russians couldn't, and they deployed five times the number of troops that we have there, plus armored divisions. Plus they had direct land access for re-inforcement and supply. Plus they were fighting a dis-organized, un-trained force that was armed with WW2 vintage weapons (until we gave them stingers). Plus the USSR did not have to deal with any public dissent....and they got their ass handed to them.

We fighting a different enemy now, one that has been at war for twenty years, one that is trained and armed, one that has known nothing but symmetrical warfare.

We do not have the luxury of a land route access. We rely upon the acquiescence of FSSRs to move men and materiel in (at a less than optimum rate). These FSSRs are eternally pressured by Putin & Co. to desist their support of our efforts.

Our ROE are designed to lose.

We lack the manpower to insert in sufficient numbers even if we did decide to win.

Pakistan, for which we have no clear FP direction, is now a dominant factor.

I could go on but the point is.....we will not "win" this. We will just waste good American lives and fortune on our way to global embarrassment at the hands of third world shit kickers.

30 posted on 08/31/2009 6:43:12 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

I know. That’s what (along with the economics of poppy agriculture) makes Afghanistan a real problem for developing a winning strategy. Just kicking the can down the road 2 years at a time is not a good long term strategy.


31 posted on 08/31/2009 6:56:37 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jonny foreigner

To be clear. I think it possible to win in Afghanistan with our warriors. I don’t think it is possible to win in Afghanistan with this pos president and his administration.


32 posted on 08/31/2009 9:00:34 AM PDT by RushLake (Liberalism--Terrorism financed by your tax dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RushLake

well as i said before “winning” depends on the goals. if the goal has been to push Al Quaida out of Afghanistan we have allready won (for the moment) years ago. for the rest i don´t see anything else which could be won in afghanistan. don´t get me wrong “we” can hold Kabul for example forever (because as said we have superior firepower and soldiers) but how does this help us to fight the terrorists?


33 posted on 08/31/2009 11:51:24 AM PDT by Jonny foreigner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Taliban/AlQaeda can be ferreted out



Reporting for duty, sir!
34 posted on 08/31/2009 7:39:16 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (To err is human, to think is Vulcan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
My principal concern is not over the enemy, terrain etc. but rather with this administration worshiping at the altar of political expediency.
35 posted on 09/01/2009 6:19:12 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson