Posted on 06/10/2009 7:34:10 PM PDT by Pinkbell
Cindy Sheehan continues anti Iraqi War protests against Bush at Texas ranch.
Dallas, TX(JusticeNewsFlash.com)–Cindy Sheehan, a zealous anti-war activist, whose son was tragically killed in the war on Iraq, led a protest Monday, near George W. Bush’s Preston Hollow home on Daria Place, as reported by Dallas Morning News. Organizers of the anti-war protest proclaim they are fighting for crimes against humanity that took place during the Bush Administration. The Dallas Peace Center, an organization involved with Sheehan since 2005, is sponsoring the protest. Activists gathered around 4:30 p.m. a few blocks from the Bush home in Crawford, Texas. The route of the demonstration started at the southwest corner of Preston Road and Royal Lane, then continued for about a mile to John J. Pershing Elementary School, which is located directly across from the gates leading to the lavish Bush home.
Reportedly the organizers of the march did not apply for a permit with the city, so they are required, by law to stay on the sidewalks. They are not to cross or impede any major streets either. Cindy Sheehan may be best known for her outstanding and radical anti-war protests against the former president, George W. Bush, when her son Casey Sheehan was killed in the Iraq War. In August 2005, she set up a makeshift camp outside the Bush’s Texas ranch, which drew national and local attention to her cause. In 2008, Sheehan ran unsuccessfully for Congress.
(Excerpt) Read more at justicenewsflash.com ...
Shouldn’t she be protesting at the White House?
Protest against Obama Cindy!
She has the focus and spirit of an ex-wife!
looks like it’s time for Cheney to visit the ranch for a hunting trip.
Somebody is needing more attention.......She is one sad woman.......Now that Bush isn’t in the WH and the media is paying her no attention....I don’t think she will ever get the satisfaction she wants...esp. after the horrible attention seeking things she did in her dead sons name..
Personally. I think she has a crush on GWB. Since he is no longer Prez, there is nothing to protest him for. So now I think she is hoping to catch a glimpse of him.
I’ve always known Cindy Shaheed was clueless. But is she so clueless that she doesn’t know Jorge is no longer president?
Personally. I think she has a crush on GWB. Since he is no longer Prez, there is nothing to protest him for. So now I think she is hoping to catch a glimpse of him.
Drop charges in 38-year-old murder case
Cindy Sheehan
San Francisco Chronicle
Friday, June 5, 2009
On Monday, San Francisco will see the opening of legal proceedings in the case of the seven former members and associates of the Black Panther Party charged in connection with the 1971 death of Sgt. John Young and conspiracy to commit murder. This surely will be one of the city’s historic trials - if indeed it goes to trial.
At the heart of this 38-year-old case are confessions obtained under torture. Much like detainees in Abu Ghraib and Bagram air base, defendants in this case were blindfolded, covered with wool blankets drenched in boiling water, subjected to suffocation with plastic bags, beatings and electric shocks to the genitals.
In this case, the torture was carried out in 1973 in New Orleans. FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover had deemed the Black Panther Party “the greatest threat to internal security of the country,” and there were no holds barred when law enforcement retaliated against the Panthers for their challenge to police brutality in the black community.
The torture of some of the defendants in New Orleans included the participation of San Francisco police officers, who extracted forced signatures from them on “confessions” written by the police. All of the men who were tortured repudiated these documents when allowed to see defense attorneys and a magistrate.
In subsequent years, courts in Louisiana and California rejected the admissibility of this tortured testimony.
There is another eerie parallel with the war in Iraq. There, after the United States could not capture al Qaeda members with provable ties to the terrorist attacks of 9/11, many innocent Iraqis have borne the brunt of the government’s determination to make someone (who at least looked like the culprits) pay dearly.
And here in San Francisco, the new attempt to prosecute this old case seems to have been generated less by any new evidence than by the atmosphere of fear fostered by the war on terror, led by a government willing to condone torture in the name of security.
The world is waiting to see if the Obama administration will hold accountable those high level officials who normalized terror. As a mother and citizen who has felt the terrible cost of a war justified by officials who claimed to have intelligence that later proved to be distorted by torture, I cannot stand silent when the same evil is practiced at home.
I join with the Nobel Peace laureates the Rev. Desmond Tutu and Mairead Corrigan Maguire, the San Francisco Labor Council, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and many others in their call to drop the charges against these men. The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has gone on record as opposing torture. I call on all officials to do so as well, to reject prosecution based on the results of torture and to defend the human rights of these men who have been subjected to such injustice.
I bet she gets some media coverage now...... =.=
This is news? How about 'Homelessness hits high because of Hussein policies'?
I’m surprised Pres. Obama didn’t offer her some Cabinet post. I bet she hasn’t paid any taxes.
You’d be surprised, but there are still places on the planet where they lock the unhinged up, unlike here where we give them face time on boob tube and headlines in the MSM.
The crazy old bat was protesting at his house, not his ranch.
The article is wrong on that fact.
“Bush’s lavish home”! Not this again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.