Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Single women gaze longer
Springer Science + Business Media ^ | 3 June 2009 | Renate Bayaz

Posted on 06/03/2009 12:58:58 PM PDT by Pharmboy

Neuroscientists found woman's partner status relevant for her interest in the opposite sex

A study by neuroscientist Heather Rupp and her team found that a woman's partner status influenced her interest in the opposite sex. In the study¹, published in the March issue of Human Nature, women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness. However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.

"These findings may reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies that may act early in the cognitive processing of potential partners and contribute to sex differences in sexual attraction and behavior," said Rupp, assistant scientist at The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction at Indiana University in the US.

For the study, 59 men and 56 women rated 510 photos of opposite-sex faces for realism, masculinity/femininity, attractiveness, or affect. Participants were instructed to give their "gut" reaction and to rate the pictures as quickly as possible. The men and women ranged in age from 17 to 26, were heterosexual, from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and were not using hormonal contraception. Of the women, 21 reported they had a current sexual partner; 25 of the men reported having a sexual partner. This is the first study to report whether having a current sexual partner influences interest in the opposite sex. Other studies have demonstrated that hormones, relationship goals and social context influence such interest.

"That there were no detectable effects of sexual partner status on women's subjective ratings of male faces, but there were on response times, which emphasizes the subtlety of this effect and introduces the possibility that sexual partner status impacts women's cognitive processing of novel male faces but not necessarily their conscious subjective appraisal," the authors wrote in the journal article. The researchers also note that influence of partner status in women could reflect that women, on average, are relatively committed in their romantic relationships, "which possibly suppresses their attention to and appraisal of alternative partners."

Reference ¹Rupp H et al. 2009. Partner Status Influences Women’s Interest in the Opposite Sex. Human Nature DOI 10.1007/s12110-009-9056-6


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: courtship; dating; freepun; humor; indianauniversity; kinsey; kinseyinstitute; partners; psychology; sexdifferences; singles; taxdollarsatwork; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
OK...who's going to be the first to post the Captain Obvious pic?
1 posted on 06/03/2009 12:58:59 PM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I wanna know how much money they spent on this ‘research’.


2 posted on 06/03/2009 1:00:12 PM PDT by farlander (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I always look down on women who cheat more than men. For example, Vitter is a sleazeball. But a woman cheating is so much worse.


3 posted on 06/03/2009 1:01:26 PM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; thefactor; SunkenCiv; aculeus; pissant; Lazamataz; martin_fierro; Tijeras_Slim
Ping for vive le difference...and Happy Birthday to thefactor!!
4 posted on 06/03/2009 1:01:45 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
GAZING WOMAN by Penelope Jencks.....
5 posted on 06/03/2009 1:02:13 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

6 posted on 06/03/2009 1:02:29 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

7 posted on 06/03/2009 1:02:53 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farlander

Hey...it’s the Kinsey folks. That’s what their $$ is for, doncha know.


8 posted on 06/03/2009 1:03:02 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Art imitates life...LOL!


9 posted on 06/03/2009 1:03:36 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
GRAZING WOMAN......................
10 posted on 06/03/2009 1:04:46 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
Colin Self Gazing Woman


11 posted on 06/03/2009 1:04:46 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
The men and women ranged in age from 17 to 26, were heterosexual,

But the headline says...

12 posted on 06/03/2009 1:06:25 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Justice is blind. Sonia Sotomayor is not even qualified to sit on an IMPARTIAL jury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
GLAZING WOMAN.................
13 posted on 06/03/2009 1:06:53 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.

The men were evaluating photos of women, I assume. ; )

14 posted on 06/03/2009 1:06:53 PM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

She looks like she has bowel cramps.


15 posted on 06/03/2009 1:07:22 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Gazing Woman
16 posted on 06/03/2009 1:07:51 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Well, DUH.

Where can I get funded for inane “research”?


17 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:03 PM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
LAZING WOMEN............
18 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:11 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Last time I saw an expression like that it was on a hound passing peach pits.


19 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:22 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
And I can show you how to hump without making love
The way you look at me, I can tell that you're a freak
And I'll be laying in the sun, bottle and a gun
The way you look at me, I can tell that you're a freak

20 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:33 PM PDT by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson