Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Single women gaze longer
Springer Science + Business Media ^ | 3 June 2009 | Renate Bayaz

Posted on 06/03/2009 12:58:58 PM PDT by Pharmboy

Neuroscientists found woman's partner status relevant for her interest in the opposite sex

A study by neuroscientist Heather Rupp and her team found that a woman's partner status influenced her interest in the opposite sex. In the study¹, published in the March issue of Human Nature, women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness. However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.

"These findings may reflect sex differences in reproductive strategies that may act early in the cognitive processing of potential partners and contribute to sex differences in sexual attraction and behavior," said Rupp, assistant scientist at The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction at Indiana University in the US.

For the study, 59 men and 56 women rated 510 photos of opposite-sex faces for realism, masculinity/femininity, attractiveness, or affect. Participants were instructed to give their "gut" reaction and to rate the pictures as quickly as possible. The men and women ranged in age from 17 to 26, were heterosexual, from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and were not using hormonal contraception. Of the women, 21 reported they had a current sexual partner; 25 of the men reported having a sexual partner. This is the first study to report whether having a current sexual partner influences interest in the opposite sex. Other studies have demonstrated that hormones, relationship goals and social context influence such interest.

"That there were no detectable effects of sexual partner status on women's subjective ratings of male faces, but there were on response times, which emphasizes the subtlety of this effect and introduces the possibility that sexual partner status impacts women's cognitive processing of novel male faces but not necessarily their conscious subjective appraisal," the authors wrote in the journal article. The researchers also note that influence of partner status in women could reflect that women, on average, are relatively committed in their romantic relationships, "which possibly suppresses their attention to and appraisal of alternative partners."

Reference ¹Rupp H et al. 2009. Partner Status Influences Women’s Interest in the Opposite Sex. Human Nature DOI 10.1007/s12110-009-9056-6


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: courtship; dating; freepun; humor; indianauniversity; kinsey; kinseyinstitute; partners; psychology; sexdifferences; singles; taxdollarsatwork; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-136 next last
OK...who's going to be the first to post the Captain Obvious pic?
1 posted on 06/03/2009 12:58:59 PM PDT by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I wanna know how much money they spent on this ‘research’.


2 posted on 06/03/2009 1:00:12 PM PDT by farlander (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I always look down on women who cheat more than men. For example, Vitter is a sleazeball. But a woman cheating is so much worse.


3 posted on 06/03/2009 1:01:26 PM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; thefactor; SunkenCiv; aculeus; pissant; Lazamataz; martin_fierro; Tijeras_Slim
Ping for vive le difference...and Happy Birthday to thefactor!!
4 posted on 06/03/2009 1:01:45 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
GAZING WOMAN by Penelope Jencks.....
5 posted on 06/03/2009 1:02:13 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

6 posted on 06/03/2009 1:02:29 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

7 posted on 06/03/2009 1:02:53 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farlander

Hey...it’s the Kinsey folks. That’s what their $$ is for, doncha know.


8 posted on 06/03/2009 1:03:02 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Art imitates life...LOL!


9 posted on 06/03/2009 1:03:36 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
GRAZING WOMAN......................
10 posted on 06/03/2009 1:04:46 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
Colin Self Gazing Woman


11 posted on 06/03/2009 1:04:46 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
The men and women ranged in age from 17 to 26, were heterosexual,

But the headline says...

12 posted on 06/03/2009 1:06:25 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Justice is blind. Sonia Sotomayor is not even qualified to sit on an IMPARTIAL jury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
GLAZING WOMAN.................
13 posted on 06/03/2009 1:06:53 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.

The men were evaluating photos of women, I assume. ; )

14 posted on 06/03/2009 1:06:53 PM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

She looks like she has bowel cramps.


15 posted on 06/03/2009 1:07:22 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Gazing Woman
16 posted on 06/03/2009 1:07:51 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Well, DUH.

Where can I get funded for inane “research”?


17 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:03 PM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
LAZING WOMEN............
18 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:11 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Last time I saw an expression like that it was on a hound passing peach pits.


19 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:22 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
And I can show you how to hump without making love
The way you look at me, I can tell that you're a freak
And I'll be laying in the sun, bottle and a gun
The way you look at me, I can tell that you're a freak

20 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:33 PM PDT by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I thought it was Ohio cheerleaders who had to be kept from grazing. Oh, wait, you said gazing.


21 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:43 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
AMAZING WOMAN..........................
22 posted on 06/03/2009 1:09:51 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

How many of them bit their lower lip while gazing at the photos? That’s the real indicator.


23 posted on 06/03/2009 1:10:28 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"which possibly suppresses their attention to and appraisal of alternative partners."

So what about that old chestnut? ...then eating 'wedding cake' suppresses women's attention to and appraisal to all partners.

24 posted on 06/03/2009 1:10:42 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Someone should post the pix of angry Michelle Obowma with the caption ‘Crazing Woman’ ...


25 posted on 06/03/2009 1:10:47 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

And in today’s other breaking stories, sun rises in east, and water freezes when it gets cold...film at ll!


26 posted on 06/03/2009 1:11:27 PM PDT by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos.

Amazing!

and how much did this study cost taxpayers?

27 posted on 06/03/2009 1:12:43 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
CRAZING WOMAN
28 posted on 06/03/2009 1:13:17 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Crazing Woman!


29 posted on 06/03/2009 1:14:18 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

LOL!


30 posted on 06/03/2009 1:14:44 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

That’s a grazing woman


31 posted on 06/03/2009 1:14:45 PM PDT by org.whodat ("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HoosierHawk

Nice pick-up...we need Captain Unambiguous to edit this release.


32 posted on 06/03/2009 1:16:21 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
PHASING WOMAN


33 posted on 06/03/2009 1:18:36 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Good ones...since you’re on fire, how about Blazing Woman?


34 posted on 06/03/2009 1:19:27 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Single women graze longer?


35 posted on 06/03/2009 1:20:49 PM PDT by DocH (Official Right-Wing Extremist Veteran Seal Of Approval)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
HAZING WOMEN

36 posted on 06/03/2009 1:20:53 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
A study by neuroscientist Heather Rupp and her team found that a woman's partner status influenced her interest in the opposite sex. In the study¹, published in the March issue of Human Nature, women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness. However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.

Federal funding for validation of common sense is not demonstrative of smart thinking.

37 posted on 06/03/2009 1:23:09 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Out of gas become a pill box, Out of ammo become a bunker, Out of hope become a hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Blazing woman...


38 posted on 06/03/2009 1:23:42 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 135 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
TASING WOMAN:


39 posted on 06/03/2009 1:25:26 PM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

40 posted on 06/03/2009 1:25:30 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
Lasing woman ...
41 posted on 06/03/2009 1:25:34 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Out of gas become a pill box, Out of ammo become a bunker, Out of hope become a hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
GRAZING WOMEN!


42 posted on 06/03/2009 1:26:52 PM PDT by petercooper (1/20/13 - Change I can believe in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Tasing woman


43 posted on 06/03/2009 1:27:38 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Sheesh...you beat me by 2 minutes.


44 posted on 06/03/2009 1:28:43 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
LA RAZING WOMAN

45 posted on 06/03/2009 1:29:27 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

They looked at opposite sex faces? How about looking at the whole body? What a bogus study.


46 posted on 06/03/2009 1:29:36 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
BLAZING WOMAN (Miss Stein)..........
47 posted on 06/03/2009 1:29:42 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Hahahahahaha...ROTFLMAO


48 posted on 06/03/2009 1:30:09 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Raising Woman


49 posted on 06/03/2009 1:30:25 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Amazing Woman...


50 posted on 06/03/2009 1:31:17 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson