[Pharmboy]

OK...who's going to be the first to post the Captain Obvious pic?

[farlander]

I wanna know how much money they spent on this ‘research’.

[exist]

I always look down on women who cheat more than men. For example, Vitter is a sleazeball. But a woman cheating is so much worse.

[Pharmboy]

Ping for vive le difference...and Happy Birthday to thefactor!!

[jessduntno]

GAZING WOMAN by Penelope Jencks.....

[twister881]

[1rudeboy]

[a fool in paradise]

The men and women ranged in age from 17 to 26, were heterosexual,

But the headline says...

[HoosierHawk]

However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.

The men were evaluating photos of women, I assume. ; )

[Revolting cat!]

Gazing Woman

[greatplains]

Well, DUH.

Where can I get funded for inane “research”?

[ßuddaßudd]

And I can show you how to hump without making love
The way you look at me, I can tell that you're a freak
And I'll be laying in the sun, bottle and a gun
The way you look at me, I can tell that you're a freak

[Larry Lucido]

I thought it was Ohio cheerleaders who had to be kept from grazing. Oh, wait, you said gazing.

[Disambiguator]

How many of them bit their lower lip while gazing at the photos? That’s the real indicator.

[Red Steel]

"which possibly suppresses their attention to and appraisal of alternative partners."

So what about that old chestnut? ...then eating 'wedding cake' suppresses women's attention to and appraisal to all partners.

[Clioman]

And in today’s other breaking stories, sun rises in east, and water freezes when it gets cold...film at ll!

[Minutemen]

However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos.

Amazing!

and how much did this study cost taxpayers?

[DocH]

Single women graze longer?

[Centurion2000]

A study by neuroscientist Heather Rupp and her team found that a woman's partner status influenced her interest in the opposite sex. In the study¹, published in the March issue of Human Nature, women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness. However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not.

Federal funding for validation of common sense is not demonstrative of smart thinking.

[bdeaner]

[Uncle Hal]

They looked at opposite sex faces? How about looking at the whole body? What a bogus study.