Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists: Incest Doomed European Royal Dynasty
FOX News ^ | April 16, 2009 | Andrea Thompson

Posted on 04/23/2009 3:32:46 AM PDT by Loyalist

The powerful Habsburg dynasty that ruled Spain for nearly 200 years came to an abrupt end in 1700 with the death of King Charles II, who left no heirs to the throne.

The termination of that royal lineage may be the result of frequent inbreeding of the line, which may have left Charles II ill and infertile, a new study suggests.

....

Historical data show that "in order to keep their heritage in their own hands, the Spanish Habsburgs began to intermarry more and more frequently among themselves," the authors of the new study wrote.

Records show that the Spanish Habsburg kings frequently engaged in consanguineous marriage (or marriage between biological relatives); nine of the 11 marriages that occurred over the dynasty's 200-year reign were consanguineous, with two uncle-niece marriages and one first-cousin marriage.

It had been suggested that this high degree of inbreeding led to the eventual extinction of the line when the "physically disabled, mentally retarded and disfigured" Charles II died after two childless marriages, the authors wrote. But this idea had not before been examined from a genetic perspective.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: europe; genetics; godsgravesglyphs; habsburg; homosexualagenda; inbreeding; incest; incestuousmarriage; royals; spain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

It had been suggested that this high degree of inbreeding led to the eventual extinction of the line when the "physically disabled, mentally retarded and disfigured" Charles II died after two childless marriages, the authors wrote. But this idea had not before been examined from a genetic perspective.

Isn't it amazing how so many people learned in history and science could fail to draw the most obvious conclusion from the Habsburg's twisted geneaology?

Acutally, it isn't. Somehow inbreeding among royalty hasn't attracted the same sort of moral censure that inbreeding among the lower classes has, even when it has produced the same results.

It's all about social class. What's a crime against nature for hillbillies in Appalachia is a virtue of nobility for the Habsburgs of Spain.

1 posted on 04/23/2009 3:32:47 AM PDT by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
It's all about social class. What's a crime against nature for hillbillies in Appalachia is a virtue of nobility for the Habsburgs of Spain.

Seems to be doesn't it. 

2 posted on 04/23/2009 3:37:48 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Hell, that looks like the family tree of New Mexico!!


3 posted on 04/23/2009 3:38:28 AM PDT by Concho (01-20-2009--The beginning of an ERROR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Concho

i don’t quite understand, didn’t we all came from two ppl


4 posted on 04/23/2009 3:44:26 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Not suprising, because of the perception of the time of the Spanish Hapsburg family.


5 posted on 04/23/2009 3:44:33 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

1) It’s always interesting to hear infertility is hereditary.

2) I wonder if this Andrea Thompson is the former Headline News Network newslady who used to be on Babylon 5.


6 posted on 04/23/2009 3:45:48 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Concho

You mean New Mexico was started by Spanish royalty in its history?


7 posted on 04/23/2009 3:45:49 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

What?!!

You mean Adam and Eve couldn’t possibly have lead to 6.2 billion people from just that one mating pair? Don’t tell the Creationists.


8 posted on 04/23/2009 3:48:06 AM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Actually, the Hapsburgs ruled most of Europe at that time (which is why the daughter of Ferdinand and Isabel ended up married to one in the first place), and royals only married royals, so the options were limited. The Habsburgs were originally from Switzerland, btw.

Virtually of the royal families of Europe are still related. Take a look at the English royal house, for example.

Maybe that explains Prince Charles...


9 posted on 04/23/2009 3:49:41 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Royalty married royalty. King George V of England, Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany and Czar Nicolas II of Russia were related (at least by marriage, all decended from England’s Queen Victoria. Nicolas’ son Alexis suffered from the genetic disorder hemophilia, one of the Queen’s sons, three of her grandsons, and six of her great-grandsons (including Alexis).

In addition the following current leaders are decended from Queen Victoria:

Elizabeth II, Queen of England
Harald V, King of Norway
Carl XVI Gustaf, King of Sweden
Margrethe II, Queen of Demnark
Juan Carlos, King of Spain


10 posted on 04/23/2009 3:54:31 AM PDT by fredhead (Liberals think globally, reason rectally, act idiotically.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Most of these people are not double cousins for no reason.


11 posted on 04/23/2009 3:59:46 AM PDT by Concho (01-20-2009--The beginning of an ERROR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

My daughter and I were discussing the Habsburgs just yesterday. They are a very sad and interesting family. Charles ll’s great-great-great grandmother was pretty much insane as a young woman and was known as Joanna the Mad or Juana la loca. Not someone you want to find swinging from a branch in your family tree. Some of us may have crazy relatives, but fortunately most of them don’t have the appellation “mad” next to their name, at least not formally. :)


12 posted on 04/23/2009 4:00:06 AM PDT by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mila

a homeschooling parent? - surely your child did not learn about them in public school


13 posted on 04/23/2009 4:03:08 AM PDT by Revelation 911 (How many 100's of 1000's of our servicemen died so we would never bow to a king?" -freeper pnh102)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: livius
Maybe that explains Prince Charles...

Charles - pets his wife and kisses his horse.

Just glad the two sons had a fresh dose of DNA from Diana! Maybe they'll turn out OK.

14 posted on 04/23/2009 4:03:43 AM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is an EVIL like no other, and must be ERADICATED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

....uh, and the sky is blue.


15 posted on 04/23/2009 4:03:56 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mila

If you go to a family reunion to meet women, you might be a redneck. Or a Habsburg.


16 posted on 04/23/2009 4:04:15 AM PDT by Loyalist (This tagline hereby predicts the marriage of Perez Hilton to Meghan McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: livius

17 posted on 04/23/2009 4:04:32 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
GOD will not be mocked, because man reaps what he sows.

LLS

18 posted on 04/23/2009 4:06:02 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my President... NEVER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

At least they are starting to turn out normal.


19 posted on 04/23/2009 4:13:38 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Far be it from me to defend incest, but doesn’t it really depend on who’s doing the breeding? You take a small sample of two (seemingly) ordinary people and their little bunch, you may see poor results. You take your typical Arab stallion and mare and cross them likewise a few generations, treat THEM like royalty, they’re probably not going to toss up even one disfigured, sterile, retarded colt.
Matter of fact, Arab humans are pretty inbred too, comparatively speaking (but we can go there on another thread). Why do we get generally healthier results from tribes and nations than from smaller samples, hmm?


20 posted on 04/23/2009 4:15:23 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( AR2, Overdue! = American Revolution II...Overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Anyone looking at the British crown has got to come to the same conclusion.
Just look at the clown next in line.
He dumped Di for horse face with a donkeys butt Camille.


21 posted on 04/23/2009 4:15:23 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (yEP,i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mila

Ironic, because from what I do remember, Joanna the mad’s sister was Catherine of Aragon, Henry VIII’s first wife.


22 posted on 04/23/2009 4:15:54 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

He dumped Di because she was crazier than an outhouse rat.


23 posted on 04/23/2009 4:17:59 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( AR2, Overdue! = American Revolution II...Overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Yep, no wonder QEII takes confort from an iPod given to her by you-know-who.


24 posted on 04/23/2009 4:18:23 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Luckily they have Diana’s looks and Charles’ brains. It would have been disaster the other way around. Diana was as dumb as a box.


25 posted on 04/23/2009 4:21:24 AM PDT by cubsfanconswoman (OH MY GOD THE BEARS HAVE A QB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

I’m counting 18 posts so far and NOT ONE PICTURE of Helen Thomas...the queen of inbreeding.


26 posted on 04/23/2009 4:30:23 AM PDT by BobL (Drop a comment: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2180357/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
i don’t quite understand, didn’t we all came from two ppl

No.

Interesting writing style, by the way.

27 posted on 04/23/2009 4:34:29 AM PDT by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

She was crazy as an outhouse rat like you say, and what woman isn’t?
Least she wasn’t a two bagger.


28 posted on 04/23/2009 4:35:12 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (yEP,i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Well, New Mexico has the oldest Spanish structures in the country and the Governors Palace in Santa FE dates from before the British thought of a colony. In New Mexico you learn that much of the propaganda from St Agustine is false.


29 posted on 04/23/2009 4:40:13 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

If your family tree doesn’t have any branches in it... You might be a Hapsburg!

(With apologies to Jeff Foxworthy)


30 posted on 04/23/2009 4:40:47 AM PDT by MortMan (Power without responsibility-the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. - Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
Maybe that explains Prince Charles...

What explains Camilla, though? ;-P

31 posted on 04/23/2009 4:42:20 AM PDT by MortMan (Power without responsibility-the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages. - Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

You need to borrow a tie and browse elsewhere for women! :)


32 posted on 04/23/2009 4:45:46 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( AR2, Overdue! = American Revolution II...Overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast; Loyalist; All

A little more in-depth history on the Habsburgs:

http://www.illuminati-news.com/black-nobility.htm


33 posted on 04/23/2009 4:50:05 AM PDT by wolfcreek ("unnamed "right-wing extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

I have a tie. It goes with my funeral suit.


34 posted on 04/23/2009 4:56:00 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (yEP,i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1

Reminds me of the old Appalachian question: Under West Virginia law, if a man divorces his wife is she still his sister?


35 posted on 04/23/2009 4:58:25 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

:D


36 posted on 04/23/2009 5:03:57 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( AR2, Overdue! = American Revolution II...Overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

The family tree is actually worse than the article says. Not only was Charles II the product of an uncle-niece marriage, but both his grandfathers were as well, and there are a number of cousin-marriages not so indicated. A marriage between a half-uncle and niece is genetically equivalent to the marriage of first cousins, but these marriages here were full uncles and nieces. How unfortunate that the Habsburgs wanted to make these marriages, and the popes gave permission.

Another sad royal case is that of Queen Anne of England. She miscarried or gave birth to stillborn children 13 times, had four children die before the age of two, and one boy who lived to eleven. There are worse heartbreaks than infertility.


37 posted on 04/23/2009 5:21:28 AM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

Oh thats bad, LOL!
Reminds me of some other distasteful rural jokes LOL.


38 posted on 04/23/2009 5:22:45 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: heartwood

Not suprising, this was the practice throughtout the royal houses in Europe, because they wanted not to have the blood lines “contaiminated” by the blood of commoners.


39 posted on 04/23/2009 5:51:49 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bert

New Mexico has a LOT of very interesting historic structures, that this has helped it draw in tourists and residents from all over the country.


40 posted on 04/23/2009 5:53:51 AM PDT by Biggirl (GO UCONN!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Periodically I see someone wanting to allow first cousin marriages, pointing out the genetic risk from doing it, once, is small. As this illustrates the risk is that allowing it once also allows the potential for it happening repeatedly. Like compounded interest, that risk then becomes large. Genetic diseases are much more common in societies where such is allowed and the families involved often believe the practice is a good thing, keeping money and power within the family.


41 posted on 04/23/2009 5:58:07 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heartwood
Queen Anne was one of 19 legitimate children of King James II of England (James VII of Scotland), only 3 of whom lived long enough to get married.

Queen Mary I (daughter of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon) married her first cousin, Philip II of Spain. They had no children.

42 posted on 04/23/2009 6:15:13 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Lately, some studies have showed that close marriages do not have this kind of effect unless there is a known genetic defect that gets carried forward through the marriages. I’m from the south and many of my ancestors married first cousins. One ancestor born about 1720 shows up in four of my lines. Three of my father’s grandparents were cousins to each other, one couple being first cousins. Most people in my father’s family live into their 90s and are relatively healthy.


43 posted on 04/23/2009 6:16:47 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

A girl dreaming of a being swept off her feet by a prince on a white horse would be safer, genetically speaking, marrying the horse.


44 posted on 04/23/2009 6:21:00 AM PDT by JRios1968 (The real first rule of Fight Club: don't invite Chuck Norris...EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

There is really nothing wrong with inbreeding. You just have to start with good stock, kill the worst third and don’t over do it, ie new blood with some frequency.

It is how you fix desired characteristics in a bloodline.


45 posted on 04/23/2009 6:23:47 AM PDT by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Monarchy, the original "Idiocracy":


46 posted on 04/23/2009 6:31:36 AM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Concho
Hell, that looks like the family tree of New Mexico!!

Just Rio Arriba County.

47 posted on 04/23/2009 6:34:14 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (When I leave this planet, it's gonna know I was here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

Interesting article!

I knew this was going to be about the Habsburgs before I even clicked on it.


48 posted on 04/23/2009 6:35:45 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LMAO!


49 posted on 04/23/2009 6:37:27 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Rifleman
There is really nothing wrong with inbreeding.

Well, with patience and intelligence you can turn wolves into Golden Retrievers, but it's never been done with humans. That free will thing always getting in the way...

50 posted on 04/23/2009 6:45:41 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( AR2, Overdue! = American Revolution II...Overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson