Posted on 04/10/2009 1:21:39 AM PDT by rxsid
Charge On!
And then I just read that Alan Keyes is arranging a “million men “ march on DC. Together with the “tea parties” and the Tenth Amendment legislations in the State legislatures it sounds like the Good Ol’ USA is not going to give in to the “usurper” without a fight.
I believe, technically, all of them as none of them have 'run the full course' of appeals, etc. Even Leo Donofrio stated that if he really wanted to pursue the matter, his case isn't a done deal as he never appealed the lower court rulling and SCOTUS mearly declined to hear the emergency stay requests.
PING
Please tell me Berg, or their local D.C. lawyer will bring up how this judge thinks the “court of public opinion” should suffice as the location for deciding on evidence in what could be the most important case in our Nation’s History...
I know there are a lot more legal terms one could use, and have used in this press release — just that it’s a good “sound bite” to get out there to the masses. Most decent citizens I think still believe our court system has problems, but is generally in “good shape”. This could wake them up in a jiffy — just this ONE decision.
Berg is right. This particular judge’s comments ARE outrageous. I wonder if he did this on PURPOSE to give them standing in a higher court so he could “pass the buck”. Surely, even a liberal judge isn’t this stupid, are they? (Wait, don’t answer that... I know the answer... LOL)
The first time I read about this decision it gobsmacked me... Now I wonder if this particular judge just wanted his name OUT of it!
I have suspected this myself. He did not want to the be th one holding the hot potato (which will be an issue for alot of judges, especially ones wanting to be placed in a higher position by Obama), but didn’t want to throw it out completely because he knew there wasn’t a legal reason to.
Love Mr. Berg. He is showing the same spirit that the liberals do. Keep on going and do not take NO for an answer. I only wish more of the right wing party had that much tenacity.
How would the judges standing grant the defendent standing that they didn't have before?
Lame! Written like a 5th grader.
My wife is a paralegal. It makes NO difference how inept or how old an attorney is to her. If she is employed by them, it is her responsibility to perform any legal or technical duties required to further a case. And...knowing her way around a computer is one of those duties.
Americans have two choices.
We can cower in fear of being conspiracy theorists as these people dismantle America and shred the constitution. Or, we can stand tall and demand to know that Obama is legally able to hold office.
Those who think we will change anything in the next election are fooling themselves. The words and actions of the democrats are quite clear, they have no intent of EVER being a minority party again.
Acorn will ensure that the democrats never lose another election unless their fraud is exposed. The first step towards that goal must be exposing the candidate himself was a fraud from the start.
Then everything else will implode in a circular firing squad of finger pointing.
Because it’s a farcical “legal reason” to declare a case has no merit. It’s bold in it’s absolute disregard for common sense, much less any basis in LAW, or under ANY examination of process of law, or any POSSIBLE absolute credibility, could a judge — unless he needs to have charges filed against him and his license to practice law removed from him — possibly honestly rule that an issue of such importance as a Constitutional REQUIREMENT to insure the NATIONAL SECURITY of this Nation against HOSTILE enemies who would seek to destroy us from within (meaning those who completely and willfully disregard the rule of law, commit fraud upon the people as a whole, and systematically start imposing laws that fly in the FACE of the Constitution and destroy our country, and hurt our citizens)... Could POSSIBLY be “decided” in the court of public opinion. Especially when even the COPY of the Birth Certificate Obama DID provide he REFUSES to give to the courts to verify it’s authenticity. This judge took the word of the WEBMASTER of FACTCHECK, and a BLOGGER AT DAILY KOS, and TWITTERING, as his evidence in this case!
Therefore, he makes the decision SO outrageous that the appeals court basically HAS to listen to it and decide against him. In fact, Berg could probably argue that this judge needs to be relieved from making any more decisions on ANY case at all, frankly...
Maybe I’m totally wrong, but this seems too outrageous to be true... Then again, if you had told me yesterday that Obama had a Mad Scientist in the basement of the White House planning on sending up a rocket full of pollution to block the Sun’s light I probably would’ve thought you were crazy, too. :)
For the record, If Hussein was born by C section, is that natural born?
Thank you for that refreshing post. I have been begging the right to work together and organize to safe this country. In doing so, I’ve been called a collectivist, etc.
My only retort, before the Revolutionary War, Sam Adams and the “Sons of Liberty” along with others knew they had to have a “UNITED” front. Even with a rag tag army, the Colonist took a United Stand.
Until this type of Unity takes place and the righties are ever vigilant and resolute keeping a watch on the elected officials, groups like ACORN will continue to take elections for the left and gain control of our government. They are tenacious and the left never gives up.
Thanks. LOL
It’s funny ‘cause it’s true!!! heh heh
{well, that and it’s also scary....)
should have been “SAVE” not safe - my apologies
Shakespeare says no.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.