PING
Please tell me Berg, or their local D.C. lawyer will bring up how this judge thinks the “court of public opinion” should suffice as the location for deciding on evidence in what could be the most important case in our Nation’s History...
I know there are a lot more legal terms one could use, and have used in this press release — just that it’s a good “sound bite” to get out there to the masses. Most decent citizens I think still believe our court system has problems, but is generally in “good shape”. This could wake them up in a jiffy — just this ONE decision.
Berg is right. This particular judge’s comments ARE outrageous. I wonder if he did this on PURPOSE to give them standing in a higher court so he could “pass the buck”. Surely, even a liberal judge isn’t this stupid, are they? (Wait, don’t answer that... I know the answer... LOL)
The first time I read about this decision it gobsmacked me... Now I wonder if this particular judge just wanted his name OUT of it!
I have suspected this myself. He did not want to the be th one holding the hot potato (which will be an issue for alot of judges, especially ones wanting to be placed in a higher position by Obama), but didn’t want to throw it out completely because he knew there wasn’t a legal reason to.
How would the judges standing grant the defendent standing that they didn't have before?