Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agriculture secretary wants more ethanol in gas
pMSNBC ^ | 3/9/2009 | AP via pMSNBC

Posted on 03/11/2009 12:45:49 PM PDT by AT7Saluki

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack says the government should move quickly to increase the amount of ethanol allowed in gasoline.

Ethanol producers asked the Environmental Protection Agency last week to increase the amount of ethanol that refiners can blend with gasoline from a maximum of 10 percent to 15 percent, which could boost the demand for the renewable fuel additive by as much as 6 billion gallons a year. However, automobile and small engine manufacturers have said there's no certainty yet that such an increase will not harm engines and fuel lines.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agriculture; bho44; bhoenergy; bhoepa; bhousda; burningfood; energypolicy; ethanol; foodsupply; fuel; obama; vilsack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: NVDave
MTBE also turned out to be a serious water pollutant. When used in outboard engines, it left a film of MTBE in the water. It's nearly impossible to remove. I've showered in MTBE contaminated water while on a business trip in Denver. It makes a hot, steamy shower smell like turpentine. Yuck.

Summer is coming. The ethanol will be pulled soon.

61 posted on 03/11/2009 10:07:48 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
Idaho, Utah, Nevada and Montana typically sell 85/87/89. I have to seek out a Sinclair station to get better octane levels. The top end is 93 at Sinclair. My 914 requires 92. The high compression engine in my wife's Piaggio BV500 requires 92 as well.

I do have two motorcycles that will run 85 octane. The Yamaha TW200 and XT250 handle it just fine. They are low compression thumpers. They are street licensed, but are light enough to maneuver the tightest single track trails in the local mountains.

62 posted on 03/11/2009 10:12:57 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
The equivalent price for nat gas should be around $1.50 w/o road use taxes... Sounds better than 40 miles for a plug in Volt, no ?
63 posted on 03/12/2009 5:49:27 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

What about butanol?


64 posted on 03/13/2009 8:45:32 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Get the bats and light the hay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

That would be a highly preferred outcome over ethanol. You’d lose the higher octane of ethanol, but you’re getting rid of the hygroscopic issues of ethanol, the pipeline corrosion issues, etc.


65 posted on 03/13/2009 9:21:17 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

It is a big advantage. Ethanol is just the wrong fuel IMHO.

Frankly, I think we should gravitate toward a totally fuel oil based transportation fuel based system and rid ourselves of gasoline all together.


66 posted on 03/13/2009 9:55:27 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Get the bats and light the hay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson