Posted on 02/09/2009 11:00:50 PM PST by little jeremiah
Al Qaeda's military commander in Afghanistan has threatened India with further attacks if the country attacks Pakistan.
"India should know that it will have to pay a heavy price if it attacks Pakistan," Mustafa Abu Yazid said in a recently released videotape. "The Mujahideen will sunder your armies into the ground, like they did to the Russians in Afghanistan."
In the videotape, Yazid referred to the November 2008 terror assault in Mumbai, saying the Indians suffered "humiliation" in the attack and more was in store if India decides to retaliate against Pakistan, the BBC reported.
The 62-hour terror spree in Mumbai resulted in 165 innocent people killed and hundreds more wounded. The Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistan-based terror group allied with al Qaeda and supported by powerful elements within Pakistans Inter-Service Intelligence agency and the military, carried out the attack, an Indian intelligence dossier stated. The dossier contained proof of calls made between the Mumbai terrorists and their handlers inside Pakistan as the attacks were ongoing, as well as transcripts of the handlers providing information to the terrorists and ordering them to murder the civilians. The handlers were heard cheering after the murders.
http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2009/02/al_qaeda_threatens_i.php
(Excerpt) Read more at longwarjournal.org ...
List?
Indeed.
whose side will Obama take?
And India guarantees Pakistan and Al Qaeda annihilation if they don’t deliver the terrorists.
no they won’t have to. I thought obama was going to invade pakistan.
Al Qaeda is seriously ignoring India’s capability to send wave after wave of troops. They don’t have a population base of a billion.
East Pakistan was a Muslim country that was on India's side, in slicing off Pakistan.
Besides, Indian Muslims aren't as susceptible to take up arms as are other Muslims. The most extremist of them moved to Pakistan, in 1947.
Lastly, Muslim extremists are not given a free run in India. They know there will be repercussions from the remaining Indians, and the repercussions are usually swift and massive.
Indira Gandhi thought she could trust her Sikh guards after she ordered their Golden Shrine stormed. She was wrong and paid with her life. What mistake may a Indian politician make now to set off the muzzies.
I know how swift and deadly the repercussions can be. I'll never forget the scenes of that train carrying Muslims after it was attacked by Hindu mobs. Horrific.
It was the other way. 68 or so were Hindu pilgrims were burnt alive on that train.
Interesting article and 9 comments at the link. Thanks for posting.
The muzzies within our border better fall in line with the rest of us .
The Muslims also toned down the eid celebrations as a mark of respect for the loss of life .
See the thing is muslims died too and they have declared that they will put the country first here .
“they will put the country first here”
As they should. If Nation States are to survive, it is critical that the nation remain the highest level of abstraction after humanity. Anyone who puts any other abstract - Religion/Race/Tribe, etc. subverts the Nation. In countries that haven’t occupied other people by force, as is the case with India, such people should be given the option to either accept the supremacy of the nation, or go somewhere else where their views are accepted.
“Let’s pick a fight with the world’s largest country!”
“Great idea Ahmed!”
Mexican drug violence spills over into the US
news.yahoo.com | 02/09/09 | ALICIA A. CALDWELL
Posted on 02/09/2009 5:54:00 PM PST by shielagolden
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2182014/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.