Posted on 12/09/2008 2:33:58 AM PST by Man50D
Yes...only Obama can really settle the issue by being forthright and honest.
Thanks for posting. Here’s another thread of interest to those of us following the Wrotnowski/Donofrio case “natural-born status” case:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2145327/posts
He should.
Thereby ignoring the "ex post facto law" provision of the Constitution. But, hey, it's a living document, you know?
Question-
Is it possible that someone other than Barack Obama Sr. was listed on the original Birth Certificate in order that both parents would appear to be U.S. citizens to allow citizenship to a baby born outside the U.S.?
If this is the case and DNA could prove that there was no biological link to the “father” listed on the birth certificate, this would explain why he will not release it.
I am still in total disbelief of what we as a nation have allowed to happen.
de Texas Fossil
Our government is BROKEN....NO ONE HAS ANY COURAGE these days.
BTTT
Except that if you look at the page of birth announcements printed in both papers, all the babies were born on or about the same date, all the birth announcements are worded identically, and none of them contain the name of the child. If these had been submitted by parents or grandparents one would expect that there would be some difference in the wording, and surely at least one would contain the name of the baby. The source of all the announcements is obviously some government office and not the family. And if Obama wasn't born locally then where did they get the information to print?
It is illuminating to see the utter lack of knowledge among our ranks. And beyond that, they appear to lack the will to inquire.
If this were Bobby Jindal instead of Obama, I have a feeling the issue would have been resolved by now.
” the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.”
I would like to see a copy of one of these types of BCs. I’d like to see how the Place/country of birth is listed. Would it be listed as “Hawaii” or some other country.
The best analysis I’ve read on the subject to date.
Me too. When I see the smug Obamabots with their Obama '08 bumper stickers driving around, I stare at them as if I were at the zoo looking at a new species. I just do not get what makes them tick. One that I saw yesterday had cut off the words of the sticker, so that only the BHO communist rising sun was still stuck to their car.
No "If's" about it. Without a valid Hawiian birth certificate that would stand up in court, Obama has failed to qualify.
This Amendment anticipated just such a situation, that regardless of whether 64 million want it or don't want it to be so, "qualification" for the office still has to be met, even after the election, and if not, he does not take office. So those who think that this is a done deal need to read their Constitution and this 20 Amendment and wake up.
Clearly, the constitution is no longer worth the parchment it’s written on. Perhaps we should simply abandon the rule of law and embrace Liberal anarchy; it’s what a good many citizens want - even a good many of our so-called intellectuals.
“How viable will our Constitution be if five Supreme Court justices should decide to void 64 million ballots?”
They could order new elections and not one voter would be disenfranchised
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.