Yes...only Obama can really settle the issue by being forthright and honest.
Thanks for posting. Here’s another thread of interest to those of us following the Wrotnowski/Donofrio case “natural-born status” case:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2145327/posts
He should.
Thereby ignoring the "ex post facto law" provision of the Constitution. But, hey, it's a living document, you know?
Our government is BROKEN....NO ONE HAS ANY COURAGE these days.
BTTT
Except that if you look at the page of birth announcements printed in both papers, all the babies were born on or about the same date, all the birth announcements are worded identically, and none of them contain the name of the child. If these had been submitted by parents or grandparents one would expect that there would be some difference in the wording, and surely at least one would contain the name of the baby. The source of all the announcements is obviously some government office and not the family. And if Obama wasn't born locally then where did they get the information to print?
If this were Bobby Jindal instead of Obama, I have a feeling the issue would have been resolved by now.
” the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.”
I would like to see a copy of one of these types of BCs. I’d like to see how the Place/country of birth is listed. Would it be listed as “Hawaii” or some other country.
The best analysis I’ve read on the subject to date.
No "If's" about it. Without a valid Hawiian birth certificate that would stand up in court, Obama has failed to qualify.
This Amendment anticipated just such a situation, that regardless of whether 64 million want it or don't want it to be so, "qualification" for the office still has to be met, even after the election, and if not, he does not take office. So those who think that this is a done deal need to read their Constitution and this 20 Amendment and wake up.
Clearly, the constitution is no longer worth the parchment it’s written on. Perhaps we should simply abandon the rule of law and embrace Liberal anarchy; it’s what a good many citizens want - even a good many of our so-called intellectuals.
“How viable will our Constitution be if five Supreme Court justices should decide to void 64 million ballots?”
They could order new elections and not one voter would be disenfranchised
First we have the claim that if Obama was born outside the country he couldn't be a U.S. citizen, since his father was an alien and his mother a minor. Fine.
Then the author says that they have a BC in Hawaii, but that doesn't mean anything, since it could have been given to someone born overseas.
Does Hawaii really give birth certificates to non-citizens? Because that's the only way this makes sense. I can see them giving a BC if Obama was definitely a citizen born overseas, but given the above arguments, he couldn't have been a citizen if born in Kenya.
Obviously, they wouldn't ask, they'd just do it.
Actually the only sort of "retroactive redefinition" that would be lawful would be a Constitutional Amendment. Congress cannot pass a law redefining a term or terms in the Constitution so as to change the meaning of the Constitution. It's a contract, unless changed per its own terms, it must mean today what it meant when ratified. Otherwise why bother to have a written Constitution.
The Constitution defines the form, powers and limitations of the national government. It impacts the states by denying them some powers they had prior to it's passage, but these are specifically enumerated in Art. I Section 10.
“How viable will our Constitution be if five Supreme Court justices should decide to void 64 million ballots?” David, this will not be the SCOTUS’s fault, you arrogant ass. BUT, David, you simpleton, what of a man who is such a fraud that he would scam 64 million voters into voting for him though he cannot be a legitimate president. Never mind David, you box of socialist rocks, we consider the Constitution more important than rule by mob. You’re still twisted from your years in socialism mindset.
Randall, you idiot stealth sycophant, this is not true! ... “Yes, we’ve seen Obama’s birth certificate and it says he was born in Honolulu.” Supposedly, his certification of live birth (meaning he was born alive somewhere and it is on record somewhere) is issued from Hawai’i, but that is not and has not been his certificate of birth, the long form saying where he was born. Sheesh, I’m getting really tired of this deceitful crap. We have a president-alleged, the coming lair in chief. Would someone please publish something nationally that tells the actual truth as known so far?
And my point is, when a writer puts such an assertion up, too many will read that far and stop because they have seen what they wanted to have verified. And will fail to read further and discover the truth.
Horowitz is finally showing his true colors.