Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How India flew to the moon, economy-class
The Times of India ^ | 26 Oct 2008, 0402 hrs IST | The Times of India

Posted on 10/25/2008 6:20:33 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins

CHENNAI: Chandrayaan-1, now on its way to the moon, has cost less than one-tenth of the Indian Premier League (IPL) rights bagged by Sony Entertainment. Rocket science may be no match for cricket when it comes to listing some of India's favourite things, but the frugality of its space odyssey could be a lesson to the world.

The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) spent just over Rs 380 crore (about half the price of a Jumbo Jet) on Chandrayaan-1, with 1,000 scientists toiling over it for three years. A similar effort by NASA or any other space agency would have cost at least five times more. In real terms, Chandrayaan-1 cost only about 4% of Isro's budget over three years.

How did Isro do it? "Optimisation," says its chairman G Madhavan Nair, in an exclusive interview to STOI. "There are some tests the Americans would have done six times and we did only thrice. We scrutinise every parameter and optimised the tests. Yes, you may call it a calculated risk, but, touch wood, we have been successful with this approach so far.'

But this didn't mean cutting corners, insists the Isro chairman. "More than 30% of the sub-systems that went into Chandrayaan-1 were used by us in other operations. The PSLV we used for the launch is almost the same we have been using for several previous launches, with the only difference being the six enhanced strap-on motors (the quantity of solid propellants was increased from nine tonnes to 12 tonnes each)."

Optimising tests on such equipment and procedures helped Isro save a lot. But it has at least partly been forced to turn this spend smart and save-philosophy into a cherished principle. The IPL deal of about Rs 5,000 crore or $1 billion is equivalent to Isro's entire annual budget, while NASA's is 20 times as much.

The next big goal: Chandrayaan-2. The deadline: 2010. The cost: Rs 500 crore. That is still only one-tenth of IPL rights.

Isro's annual only recently increased to Rs 5,000 crore or $ 1 billion. This happened when the Mark 3 of GSLV was commissioned and there was a new thrust towards societal application of space projects. Five years ago, Isro's annual budget was merely around just $200 million.

On the brighter side, Antrix Corporation, Isro's commercial wing, has earned Rs 900 crore from commercial satellite launches and sale of remote sensing data last financial year and the revenues are growing at 25%. "We have launched 16 satellites for other countries so far and another four are on the anvil. Commercial launches add to our earnings," says Madhavan Nair. This should augur well for Isro, which has such ambitious projects as the Rs 12,000 crore manned space mission scheduled for 2015.

Another aspect that makes Isro stand out in the group of space-faring nations is its down-to-earth scientists. Anyone who has taken a peep into the mission control at the Satish Dhawan Space Centre at Sriharikota would have been struck by the simplicity of Isro scientists in crumpled white lab coats with the blue letters 'PSLV' on their back, who hugged each other when PSLV-C11 injected Chandrayaan-1 into the earth orbit about 18 minutes after take-off.

"We have a cohesive team which has an open culture. It is a culture developed from the times of Vikram Sarabhai, who used to treat everyone including the cook and the gardener as friends," says Madhavan Nair. Does that mean there are no ego clashes between scientists? "Oh, yes, there may be some, but we thrash out things in the open. For everyone, success of our projects is the ultimate goal."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: india; isro; moon; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 10/25/2008 6:20:34 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

That design looks like 4 Space Shuttles strapped to the bottom of a pencil.

Minus the wings of course.


2 posted on 10/25/2008 6:24:44 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

Out of 13 launches, the PSLV has had only one failure- its maiden launch, in 1991. That was because of a software glitch.


3 posted on 10/25/2008 6:27:32 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Easy enough when they got to study all the American methods and calculations from 1969.

Generics are cheaper than origional research.


4 posted on 10/25/2008 6:27:56 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

What a stupid, hokey article. When going on about the cost, they seem to neglect the fact that NASA never would’ve done the mission because it was a worthless publicity stunt. If there’s something we want to know about the moon, we’ll ask the guys we’re sending there in 12 years to check it out for us. (Oooh, Pwned!)


5 posted on 10/25/2008 6:28:39 PM PDT by ClaudiusI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

That’s pretty good odds..

But still looks like 4 shuttles strapped to a pencil to me..

:0)


6 posted on 10/25/2008 6:31:07 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Good for India!


7 posted on 10/25/2008 6:39:07 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Well yes, it is easier and cheaper to do something the once a precedent has been set.


8 posted on 10/25/2008 6:42:22 PM PDT by DancesWithBolsheviks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DancesWithBolsheviks

Missile export treaties don’t allow tech transfers of the kind you’re imagining.


9 posted on 10/25/2008 6:48:28 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClaudiusI

Nonetheless an American failure to maintain a lead in space technology threatens to do more harm to the Nation than perhaps any other government decision. And if Obama is elected, he has promised to let the Chinese and/or Indians control space, since we will not be permitted to “weaponize” it.


10 posted on 10/25/2008 6:50:57 PM PDT by Buchal ([Future bumper sticker] Don't blame me, I voted for Ron Paul . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
A similar effort by NASA or any other space agency would have cost at least five times more.

Christ, NASA spent millions developing a pen that could write inzero gravity. The Russians used a pencil.
11 posted on 10/25/2008 6:53:19 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

To be frank, that was just a rumor.


12 posted on 10/25/2008 6:54:54 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

To be frank, I know. I was joking.

Sarchasm: n, The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn’t get it.


13 posted on 10/25/2008 6:57:42 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

I’m not imagining any specific ‘tech transfer’ but instead the assurance that it was feasible by previous example and the use of general technologies that have had advances in the past 39 years.


14 posted on 10/25/2008 6:58:34 PM PDT by DancesWithBolsheviks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS

LOL!


15 posted on 10/25/2008 6:58:52 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2

More like a Proton, which has the same sort of engine layout.


16 posted on 10/25/2008 7:01:04 PM PDT by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DancesWithBolsheviks

I don’t think the author was comparing 1960’s prices for NASA with 2008 prices for ISRO. If anything, the manufacturing experience NASA enjoys should ideally make development costs substantially cheaper for NASA.


17 posted on 10/25/2008 7:01:43 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

You are right. I misunderstood the comparison.


18 posted on 10/25/2008 7:06:16 PM PDT by DancesWithBolsheviks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

If India wants to be front and center in Moon exploration, perhaps even the leader of an international Lunar project, its next project should do just one thing: Land a tunneling robot on the Moon.

It is a heavy cargo, but it’s on a one way trip. It doesn’t have to tunnel fast, maybe only an inch a day, just approach a vertical rock wall and start tunneling. Probably powered by a radioactive source. It tunnels in a few feet, carries out the rubble, then inserts reinforcing rod. A final spray with sealant against micro-fissures.

The purpose is that once built, a rock tunnel solves any number of problems. It shields against cosmic and induced radiation, extremes of heat and cold, vacuum, and the horribly abrasive Lunar dust. And it has far more space than any habitat sent from Earth.

The ship that carries the robot is built to be cannibalized for things like pressure doors, flooring, walls and ceiling. And once the tunnel is dug, it can build secondary tunnels, or even a cistern for the storage of water ice. Having a tunnel will extend mission time by weeks or even months.

If India can do this, basically build the first Moonbase, everyone will want to join in.


19 posted on 10/25/2008 7:12:43 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaudiusI
NASA never would’ve done the mission because it was a worthless publicity stunt.

Right, because NASA never engages in worthless publicity stunts.

There's no question that the US pioneered the entire field of lunar exploration and research, but robotic missions like this make enormous sense - that's why NASA has a couple of scientific payloads flying up on that Indian orbiter.
20 posted on 10/25/2008 7:25:37 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson