Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) 'Abhorrent' in 2004 Letter to Chicago Gay Newspaper:
http://catholiccitizens.org/news/contentview.asp?c=48402 ^ | 10/20/08 | Catholic Citizens of Illinois

Posted on 10/20/2008 12:51:43 PM PDT by OPS4

ABC News reported, "When he began his campaign for U.S. Senate, [Obama] told a group called Independent Voters of Illinois.

2004-02-11

Obama on Marriage

As an African-American man, a child of an interracial marriage, a committed scholar, attorney and activist who works to protect the Bill of Rights, I am sensitive to the struggle for civil rights. As a state Senator, I have taken on the issue of civil rights for the LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender] community as if they were my own struggle because I believe strongly that the infringement of rights for any one group eventually endangers the rights enjoyed under law by the entire population. Since 1996, I have been the sponsor or a chief co-sponsor of measures to expand civil liberties for the LGBT community including hate-crimes legislation, adoption rights and the extension of basic civil rights to protect LGBT persons from discrimination in housing, public accommodations, employment and credit.

Today, I am a candidate for the U.S. Senate. Unlike any of my opponents, I have a legislative track record. No one has to guess about what I will do in Washington. My record makes it very clear. I will be an unapologetic voice for civil rights in the U.S. Senate.

For the record, I opposed DOMA [the Defense of Marriage Act] in 1996. It should be repealed and I will vote for its repeal on the Senate floor. I will also oppose any proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban gays and lesbians from marrying. This is an effort to demonize people for political advantage, and should be resisted … .

(Excerpt) Read more at catholiccitizens.org ...


TOPICS: Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doma; obama
Nobama
1 posted on 10/20/2008 12:51:44 PM PDT by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OPS4

I hope they beat him up over this in California.


2 posted on 10/20/2008 12:56:19 PM PDT by Sparky1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Perhaps his Muslim upbringing got the better of him.


3 posted on 10/20/2008 12:56:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Is Obamanation what our founding fathers, our fallen men in combat, and Ronald Reagan had in mind?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

because I believe strongly that the infringement of rights for any one group eventually endangers the rights enjoyed under law by the entire population.

NONSENSE. Not every single person in this Country has the same rights in all areas under our laws.
A 10 year old can not drive.
A Convicted felon can not own a firearm
A brother may not marry a sister
A 23 year old can not be President.
and several thousand’s of more examples.....
2 men or 2 women have no “right” to the same marriage as a man and women as defined by 2000 years of history and previous law.


4 posted on 10/20/2008 12:57:29 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Vote FOR AMERICA . Vote McCain / Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparky1776

Actually, the homosexual community will love this. I made the same mistake you did BTW.


5 posted on 10/20/2008 12:58:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Is Obamanation what our founding fathers, our fallen men in combat, and Ronald Reagan had in mind?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

I think a coked up Barry in the back of a limo with Larry is abhorrent.


6 posted on 10/20/2008 1:03:20 PM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

I believe strongly that the infringement of rights for any one group eventually endangers the rights enjoyed under law by the entire population

I guess he means only if you are a lib.
No freedom of speech for republicans or NOBAMAS.


7 posted on 10/20/2008 1:07:38 PM PDT by machogirl (alan colmes gives me a headache, and I am Joe the plumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

What mistake did I make?

I’m sure the homosexual community will love it, but what about the 61% that voted AGAINST gay marriage the last time around?


8 posted on 10/20/2008 1:12:02 PM PDT by Sparky1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
As an African-American man, a child of an interracial marriage...

The "post-racial" candidate is not above playing identity politics, it would seem.

9 posted on 10/20/2008 1:13:20 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

O also considers medical attention for babies born alive following an abortion attempt.


10 posted on 10/20/2008 1:14:29 PM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............but does have a bracelet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

O also considers medical attention abhorrent for babies born alive following an abortion attempt.


11 posted on 10/20/2008 1:14:49 PM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............but does have a bracelet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparky1776

Sorry, I was working it from the other direction. After I posted, I realized you may not have been. I was thinking more of this being a negative to homosexuals, until I realized I’d made a mistake. At first I thought you may have done the same thing I did.

Last time it was something like 61%. This time I think the leftists have been working overtime in our schools, universities, and in the popular culture (media).

I’d be delighted to see 61% or more vote in Prop 8, canceling out homosexual marriage. At this point I’m fearful it may not pass. Then the full court press will be activated to propagandize our children.


12 posted on 10/20/2008 1:17:52 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Is Obamanation what our founding fathers, our fallen men in combat, and Ronald Reagan had in mind?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Will ANYTHING stop this evil man from taking over our country? We need to keep praying and working to defeat this evil man obama.


13 posted on 10/20/2008 1:24:59 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teletech

yes he can be stopped

get everyone you know out to vote , , pick them up, tell everyone the dangers.
this man cannot win this election or America will be damaged maybe forever

there is a reason why our enemies and radicals want obama.Hams, Hizbullah, Irans leader, chavez,nation of islam,black panthers, north Korea’s leader,Castro etc etc

should be a sign saying I know who to vote for when our enemies don’t want him ,
McCain for president


14 posted on 10/20/2008 1:34:02 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick MA,CT sham marriage end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
credit 2 Peoples cube
15 posted on 10/20/2008 2:31:53 PM PDT by listenhillary (Should we turn Alaska or Texas into our Galt's Gulch?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
enter the Table of Contents of the Catechism of the Catholic Church here
 
 
through 10 of 73 matching documents, best matches first.    sort by date
Results by:Thunderstone  Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   next>>
1: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1615  (724 bytes )  preview document matches
5 This unequivocal insistence on the indissolubility of the marriage bond may have left some perplexed and could seem to be a demand impossible to realize. However,
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1615.htm
95%**********

2: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1640  (449 bytes )  preview document matches
0 Thus the marriage bond has been established by God himself in such a way that a marriage concluded and consummated between baptized persons can never be dissolved.
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1640.htm
94%*********_

3: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1660  (423 bytes )  preview document matches
0 The marriage covenant, by which a man and a woman form with each other an intimate communion of life and love, has been founded and endowed with its own special
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1660.htm
94%*********_

4: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1631  (704 bytes )  preview document matches
1 This is the reason why the Church normally requires that the faithful contract marriage according to the ecclesiastical form. Several reasons converge to explain
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1631.htm
94%*********_

5: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1638  (275 bytes )  preview document matches
8 "From a valid marriage arises a bond between the spouses which by its very nature is perpetual and exclusive; furthermore, in a Christian marriage the spouses are
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1638.htm
94%*********_

6: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1652  (859 bytes )  preview document matches
2 "By its very nature the institution of marriage and married love is ordered to the procreation and education of the offspring and it is in them that it finds its
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1652.htm
94%*********_

7: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2366  (732 bytes )  preview document matches
6 Fecundity is a gift, an end of marriage, for conjugal love naturally tends to be fruitful. A child does not come from outside as something added on to the mutual
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2366.htm
94%*********_

8: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1630  (230 bytes )  preview document matches
5 The parties to a marriage covenant are a baptized man and woman, free to contract marriage, who freely express their consent; "to be free" means: - not being under
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1625.htm
94%*********_

9: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1632  (957 bytes )  preview document matches
2 So that the "I do" of the spouses may be a free and responsible act and so that the marriage covenant may have solid and lasting human and Christian foundations,
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1632.htm
94%*********_

10: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1633  (326 bytes )  preview document matches
3 In many countries the situation of a mixed marriage (marriage between a Catholic and a baptized non-Catholic) often arises. It requires particular attention on
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1633.htm
94%*********_

1 through 10 of 73 matching documents, best matches
 
 
 

16 posted on 10/20/2008 10:43:10 PM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

bump


17 posted on 10/21/2008 11:19:25 PM PDT by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson