Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foiled Again - Attempt to Paint Palin as Slashing Funds to Teen Moms Proven False
LifeSiteNews ^ | 9/5/08 | Dr. Warren Throckmorton

Posted on 09/05/2008 5:02:37 PM PDT by wagglebee

September 5, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Contrary to a widely circulated report in Tuesday's Washington Post, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, did not slash funding for a program supporting teen mothers.

The Washington Post's Paul Kane reported that "Palin Slashed Funding for Teen Moms." The far-left Huffington Post repeated the story the next day, and it was off and running. To support this contention, Kane produced the 2008 Alaska budget, along with Governor Palin's line-item reductions. Kane said, "Palin reduced funding for Covenant House Alaska by more than 20 percent, cutting funds from $5 million to $3.9 million." Sounds like a reduction, right?

Not so. Here's the background.

Covenant House Alaska is a faith-based, not-for-profit agency which provides a variety of services to troubled teens, including a home for teen moms. Although the work with adolescent mothers is only one component of Covenant's services, Kane focused on this particular aspect of its work. His focus was not a surprise, given the revelation that Governor Palin's teen daughter is five months pregnant. Covenant House requested additional state funding to help expand housing capacity. The legislature agreed that expansion was a worthy objective and allocated the substantial sum of $5 million in the proposed budget.

In Alaska, the governor is allowed to reduce budget allocations in the service of sound management and fiscal accountability. It is true that Mrs. Palin trimmed the proposed $5 million allocation to $3.9 million. However, the Washington Post did not tell readers that the state of Alaska's 2008 allocation was three times more than Covenant House Alaska received from all government grants in 2007. According to records posted on the Covenant House Alaska website, the organization received just over $1.3 million dollars from grants in 2007 and nearly $1.2 million in 2006. Even with the reductions, Governor Palin signed a budget which provided a massive influx of support for troubled teens.

Thus, the Post report is misleading on three counts. One, the funding in question went to an organization which provides many different services, including work with teen mothers. There was no funding at issue exclusively earmarked for pregnant teens. No funds directly allocated to teen moms were slashed.

Two, the report gives the impression that the Governor reduced prior state funding levels, when, in fact, the Palin-approved budget allowed a massive expansion of funding for this faith-based organization. The organization's total revenue for 2007, from all sources, was just over $3 million. Thus, the amount approved by Palin and the Alaska legislature was a huge increase. The money given to Covenant House cannot be considered a cut in funding; it was a raise, even if the raise was not as great as originally contemplated by the legislature.

Three, Covenant House Alaska experienced no cut in operating expenses as the result of the Palin budget. The center's executive director, Deirdre Cronin, explained it this way in a September 4 statement, which she provided directly to me:

Despite some press reports to the contrary, our operating budget was not reduced. Our $3.9 million appropriation is directed toward a multi-year capital project and it is our understanding that the state simply opted to phase in its support for this project over several years, rather than all at once in the current budget year.

Viewed within the context of prior expenditures, it becomes clear that Governor Palin increased funding for social services which benefit kids, not "slashed" them as the Post reported. The increase is the beginning of a multi-year investment in help for vulnerable teens. A prudent course, the state will monitor the progress of Covenant House and allocate funds over time. In this way, Palin demonstrated she is not afraid to exercise fiscal caution, even when that decision involves those of similar ideology. On the organization's website, Covenant House makes a clear religious appeal saying:

Just as Christ in His humanity is the visible sign of God's presence among His people, so our efforts together in the covenant community are a visible sign that effects the presence of God, working through the Holy Spirit among ourselves and our kids.

Taking everything into account, a dramatically different picture of Governor Palin's actions comes into focus. Executive Director Cronin sees it differently than Mr. Kane, saying, "We are grateful for the support we have received from Governor Sarah Palin, the Alaska legislature and our Congressional delegation over the years."

In Washington, D.C., sometimes more is less. In Alaska, more is still more.

Warren Throckmorton, PhD is an associate professor of psychology at Grove City College and fellow for psychology and public policy with the Center for Vision & Values. He can be reached via his blog, http://www.wthrockmorton.com/.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: mccainpalin; moralabsolutes; palin; palinrecord; sarahpalin; teenpregnancy; throckmorton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Covenant House Alaska is a faith-based, not-for-profit agency which provides a variety of services to troubled teens, including a home for teen moms. Although the work with adolescent mothers is only one component of Covenant's services, Kane focused on this particular aspect of its work. His focus was not a surprise, given the revelation that Governor Palin's teen daughter is five months pregnant. Covenant House requested additional state funding to help expand housing capacity. The legislature agreed that expansion was a worthy objective and allocated the substantial sum of $5 million in the proposed budget.

So, the left views a 300% INCREASE as a cut?!

1 posted on 09/05/2008 5:02:37 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


2 posted on 09/05/2008 5:03:16 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

there’s going to be more of this.

the dems can’t win fairly, so they’ll create false stories.


3 posted on 09/05/2008 5:05:30 PM PDT by ken21 (people die and you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

As long as the maggots in the MSM can keep the spotlight on Governor Palin, they won’t have to worry about it shining on their boy.


4 posted on 09/05/2008 5:06:55 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (McCain/Palin '08! Real change you won't have to "believe in." You'll be able to see it!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

ping


5 posted on 09/05/2008 5:07:26 PM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The problem we have is that when propaganda is printed by major papers like WP & NYT, it is widely read and believed. The retractions, if printed, are buried where no one will see them.

WE know that the stories are false, but the average reader never finds that out. Sometimes the average reader continues to believe the original story even if they DO see the retraction.

This phenomenon is well known by psychologists. I’m sure it’s also well-known by leftwing press and leftwing campaigns.


6 posted on 09/05/2008 5:08:52 PM PDT by generally (Ask me about FReepers Folding@Home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generally

yes, old nazi propaganda tactic commonly used by the drive-by media.


7 posted on 09/05/2008 5:10:29 PM PDT by 38special (I mean come on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Remember, Alaska is running a surplus. something that Barack doesn’t understand


8 posted on 09/05/2008 5:11:12 PM PDT by realcleanguy ("I have not yet begun to fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

And Alaska doesn’t need a tax cut because they don’t have a state sales tax or personal income tax.


9 posted on 09/05/2008 5:16:53 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Of course. That’s how the left always views funding. Any smaller increase than the largest amount requested/projected is a “cut.”


10 posted on 09/05/2008 5:19:44 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("McCain and Palin: The Normal People Revolution" ~ rrrod)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Photobucket

Oh my God,it can't be.

I checked this story myself!

11 posted on 09/05/2008 5:23:39 PM PDT by hercuroc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Not only that, but they are allegedly all mad because an overtly Christian ministry did not receive more money!

These people are insane.


12 posted on 09/05/2008 5:23:53 PM PDT by Notwithstanding (Obama/Biden: the "O" stands for Zero Executive Experience & Zero Accomplishments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The leftist media is destroying ever shred of credibility they could fake. This election my not only crush Obama and the Clintons. It seems to be exposing the left at every turn to normally inattentive people.


13 posted on 09/05/2008 5:26:41 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; All

Typical Demagogue LIES..... a reduction in any PROPOSED increase is portrayed as a cut. Even when the funding goes up a remarkable 300% IN ONE YEAR the libs dare to portray it as a cut...... we are dealing with so many depraved scumbags here, in the media and in the Demagogue Party, who will say or do whatever they think they can get away with...... and they know that they routinely get away with this kind of stuff.


14 posted on 09/05/2008 5:31:52 PM PDT by Enchante (Millions of liberals stock up on laundry detergent as they soil more underwear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I have more respect for prostitutes than I do so called journalists. At least they are honest about being wh__s.

There is a very real war being waged on American soil. The Left against the United States. It is "total war" as understood by Sherman. No target is off limits, no tactic is immoral and no prisoners are to be taken.

15 posted on 09/05/2008 5:35:49 PM PDT by Lawgvr1955 (You can never have too much cowbell !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yep, they’ve been using this “math” and “logic” for decades. Amazing, isn’t it?


16 posted on 09/05/2008 5:41:37 PM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA, SAS) Praise God and pass the ammunition!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

No, they know it wasn’t a cut. They just lie.


17 posted on 09/05/2008 5:46:26 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Any smaller increase than the largest amount requested/projected is a “cut.”

Except when talking about non-liberal actions like military, drug enforcement etc. A penny over there is 'profligate spending'!

18 posted on 09/05/2008 6:25:43 PM PDT by SES1066 (Cycling to conserve, Conservative to save, Saving to Retire, will Retire to Cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The leftists in the media always uses a reduction in a spending increase as a Republican ‘slash’ of funding.

IT’s an old ploy but it works because most people don’t get past the headlines.


19 posted on 09/05/2008 6:31:43 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

Good point. And tax-rate reductions are always “tax cuts,” even if they produce more actual revenue.


20 posted on 09/05/2008 6:32:58 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("McCain and Palin: The Normal People Revolution" ~ rrrod)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson