Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Humans Wore Shoes 40,000 Years Ago, Fossil Suggests
National Geographic News ^ | 7-1-2008 | Scott Norris

Posted on 07/01/2008 8:09:54 PM PDT by blam

Humans Wore Shoes 40,000 Years Ago, Fossil Suggests

Scott Norris for National Geographic News
July 1, 2008

Humans were wearing shoes at least 10,000 years earlier than previously thought, according to a new study.

The evidence comes from a 40,000-year-old human fossil with delicate toe bones indicative of habitual shoe-wearing, experts say.

A previous study of anatomical changes in toe bone structure had dated the use of shoes to about 30,000 years ago.

Now the dainty-toed fossil from China suggests that at least some humans were sporting protective footwear 10,000 years further back, during a time when both modern humans and Neandertals occupied portions of Europe and Asia.

Study author Erik Trinkaus, a paleoanthropologist at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, said the scarcity of toe bone fossils makes it hard to determine when habitual shoe-wearing became widespread.

However, he noted, even Neandertals may have been strapping on sandals.

"Earlier humans, including Neanderthals, show [some] evidence of occasionally wearing shoes," Trinkaus said.

Regular shoe use may have become common by 40,000 years ago, but "we still have no [additional] evidence from that time period—one way or the other," the scientist said.

The study by Trinkaus and Chinese co-author Hong Shang appears in the July issue of the Journal of Archaeological Science.

Tale of the Toes

In a previous study, Trinkaus found that shoe-wearing and barefoot human groups show characteristic differences in the size and strength of their middle toe bones. Consistent shoe use results in a more delicate bone structure, because footwear reduces the force on middle toes during walking.

In his latest study, this anatomical evidence allowed Trinkaus to date the origin of shoes to a period long before the oldest known shoe remains.

Elizabeth Semmelhack curates the Bata Shoe Museum in Toronto, Canada. She said given what we know about the effects of shoe-wearing, Trinkaus' approach makes perfect sense.

"The simple act of wearing shoes alters the structure of our feet," Semmelhack said.

"It's interesting that [Trinkaus] is looking at these prehistoric remains and coming to the same conclusions."

Function vs. Fashion

The first forms of protective footwear probably evolved from simple wrappings used to insulate the feet from snow and freezing temperatures, experts say.

The oldest preserved shoe remains, dating to roughly 10,000 years ago from the western United States, are simple sandals woven of plant fibers.

But at some point shoes stopped being mere protection and become a fashion item.

Some anthropologists have suggested that even the earliest shoes may have served a more symbolic than protective function.

Beads found around the ankles and feet of human skeletons dated to 27,000 years ago suggest the presence of decorated footwear, Trinkaus said.

"History is replete with examples of impractical, irrational shoes," noted shoe museum curator Semmelhack.

"The actual first shoes may have been created out of necessity. But elements of irrationality probably crept in very early on," she said.

"Even these ancient people were probably trying to express something."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fossil; freepun; godsgravesglyphs; humans; hushpuppies; odoreaters; shoes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2008 8:09:54 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GGG Ping.


2 posted on 07/01/2008 8:10:24 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Gee they used shoes as a fashion statement? Did they wear Birkenstocks?


3 posted on 07/01/2008 8:11:48 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Photobucket
4 posted on 07/01/2008 8:12:12 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I wonder if they had corner stores back then.


5 posted on 07/01/2008 8:12:30 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

**”Even these ancient people were probably trying to express something.”**

Like mine is bigger than yours?


6 posted on 07/01/2008 8:13:28 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Previously posted here;

First Shoes Worn 40,000 Years Ago

7 posted on 07/01/2008 8:13:30 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

lol thanks


8 posted on 07/01/2008 8:14:24 PM PDT by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

Is that not 36,000+ years before the universe was magically created?


9 posted on 07/01/2008 8:14:24 PM PDT by Natchez Hawk (Truth: The anti-drug war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I am more appreciative of whoever invented pants .


10 posted on 07/01/2008 8:16:26 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
It's really kind of dumb to think they didn't wear some kind of shoe. Walking on desert sands burns...walking on stones hurts....walking in snow freezes your toesies off...

Bottom line...You just did what you thought best. Man was never an idiot.

11 posted on 07/01/2008 8:18:29 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
I'm sure, Imeda Marcos, Is insisting, "Its' in my Genes!"
12 posted on 07/01/2008 8:24:23 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Natchez Hawk

First came the shoe and then came the universe.


13 posted on 07/01/2008 8:24:29 PM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
"I am more appreciative of whoever invented pants ."

Pants were invented by the people who domesticated the horse. Straddling a horse is pretty tough without pants. The people in the article below probably domesticated the horse:

The Curse Of The Red-Headed Mummy

The oldest pair of pants ever found was being worn by these folks.

14 posted on 07/01/2008 8:25:51 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
Stick dead animals on your feet. Makes sense to me.

15 posted on 07/01/2008 8:28:45 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Ask me again tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Footwear is always in fashion ;)


16 posted on 07/01/2008 8:28:47 PM PDT by Natchez Hawk (Truth: The anti-drug war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam

Pricey-not easy on the feet, but lovey: a pair of Jimmy Choo’s./Just Asking - seoul62.......


17 posted on 07/01/2008 8:36:48 PM PDT by seoul62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Truly, sir, all that I live by is with the awl: I
meddle with no tradesman’s matters, nor women’s
matters, but with awl. I am, indeed, sir, a surgeon
to old shoes; when they are in great danger, I
recover them. As proper men as ever trod upon
neat’s leather have gone upon my handiwork. —Shakespeare, “Julius Caesar”


18 posted on 07/01/2008 9:25:52 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I do love so the National Geo. They can take the merest sand grain of fact and turn it into a beach of speculation.


19 posted on 07/01/2008 9:30:54 PM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
MARULLUS :But what trade art thou? answer me directly.

Second Commoner :A trade, sir, that, I hope, I may use with a safe
conscience; which is, indeed, sir, a mender of bad soles.

MARULLUS :What trade, thou knave? thou naughty knave, what trade?

Second Commoner :Nay, I beseech you, sir, be not out with me: yet,
if you be out, sir, I can mend you.
20 posted on 07/01/2008 9:36:26 PM PDT by lesser_satan (Cthulu '08! Why vote for the lesser evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson