To: SeekAndFind
Smith College of MA also dropped the SAT requirements.
To: SeekAndFind
College is only about tuition fees anyway. As long as you can fog a mirror and have the money, you’re in.
3 posted on
05/27/2008 6:48:08 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(De-Globalize yourself !)
To: SeekAndFind
no surprise Belmont college just surpassed Wake Forest in Southern private college ratings.
and David Lipscomb is gaining
4 posted on
05/27/2008 6:48:08 PM PDT by
wardaddy
(I want a woman POTUS like Elizabeth I in that last movie.....that is a she I could vote for. Balls)
To: SeekAndFind; Allegra; big'ol_freeper; Lil'freeper; TrueKnightGalahad; blackie; Larry Lucido; ...
All this will do is increase the crop of idiots we already have growing in our mist!
Next time you are at Walmart, just watch the cashier when you check out. That will tell you the tale!
5 posted on
05/27/2008 6:49:07 PM PDT by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: SeekAndFind
This is so schools can keep their admissions more ‘objective’ and can do their own social engineering quotas and avoid any reverse discrimination charges. In the long run all it will do is admit poorer quality students who will be harmed more than helped by the policy because they will not be able to excel and may drop out instead of going to a school where they could succeed.
6 posted on
05/27/2008 6:51:20 PM PDT by
Always Right
(Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
To: SeekAndFind
If your standards are too high.. lower your standards!
7 posted on
05/27/2008 6:54:33 PM PDT by
motor_racer
(Open war is upon you, whether you would risk it or not.)
To: SeekAndFind
The school, which did away with the testing requirement while examining how to diversify the student population Got to get those diverse students to get government money.
9 posted on
05/27/2008 7:00:01 PM PDT by
razorback-bert
(Demorats tax returns consists of "welfare in" and " child support out.")
To: SeekAndFind
Is this being done for the betterment of mankind and Western Civilization, or for the benefit of those who are too dumb to pass the test, in the name of diversity??
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act." George Orwell, 1984
In Liberal/Leftist politics 'reality' is an inconvenience best ignored. But unfortunately for the liberal agenda, reality is that thing that even when you stop believing in it, is still there. As with all liberal experiments in social engineering, its the good intentions that matters, not the results.
12 posted on
05/27/2008 7:05:37 PM PDT by
Main Street
(Stuck in traffic)
To: SeekAndFind
Minority kids dont do well on the SAT so there must be something wrong with the test. I look forward to a move diverse student population. How about admitting a percentage of those flunking classes in high school, or those with a criminal record, or dont forget those who dropped out of high school, save some slots for them too.
13 posted on
05/27/2008 7:06:34 PM PDT by
Bulldawg Fan
(Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
To: SeekAndFind
The fact that some students do well despite scoring low on SATs could very possibly be an indication of bias by instructors rather than failure of the SAT.
17 posted on
05/27/2008 7:18:08 PM PDT by
yarddog
To: SeekAndFind
New requirement test:
Are you a minority?
Are you a woman?
Do you feel you’re getting screwed in Whitey’s society?
Welcome aboard.
19 posted on
05/27/2008 7:27:08 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
To: SeekAndFind
This decision troubles me.
To: SeekAndFind
Officials there say the scores are not the best predictor of academic potential.Because 'academic potential' today means your potential to be a doofus activist liberal who pushes socialism, womyn studies, and environmental justice, and NOT the ability to think, calculate, write, read, or produce anything of value.
To: SeekAndFind
Standardized tests, especially of the general knowledge type like the SATs, are marginal predictors of “success” in college, but extremely good predictors of success AFTER college. These schools that are dropping the standardized test requirements are likely to end with students who get wonderful grades, but then have lousy incomes later, and aren’t in a position to donate much to the college, or to enhance the college’s reputation which attracts better applicants in the future.
To: SeekAndFind
Great. So we’re going to remove about the only objective criterion for determining college admissions. Wonderful.
28 posted on
05/28/2008 2:48:02 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(<===Non-bitter, Gun-totin', Typical White American)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson