Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hey, every win counts. Delegates are delegates. Go Mitt!

Oh, and in honor of the mention of curling, I post for your viewing pleasure: Weird Al's...Canadian Idiot

1 posted on 01/22/2008 6:45:47 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 1curiousmind; Abbeville Conservative; ajay_kumar; alwaysconservative; AmericanMade1776; ...
Mitt Ping!



Mitt Romney Ping List

• Send FReep Mail to Unmarked Package to get [ON] or [OFF] the Mitt Romney Ping List


2 posted on 01/22/2008 6:47:31 PM PST by Reaganesque (Romney ...is manifestly the best candidate. - Ann Coulter [01/17/08])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

God bless Louisiana!!!!!!


3 posted on 01/22/2008 6:48:06 PM PST by Romneyfor President2008 (I'm a Mittman who loves the Mittens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

I would have thought that Huckabee would do well there given he’s from a neighboring state.

There are a lot of southern Baptists in the northern part of the state - fertile ground for Huckabee.


6 posted on 01/22/2008 6:51:09 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Okay. I'm going to bring up my prediction posted in Dec. 2005. I have held off openly backing Romney, and even considered Fred Thompson. Didn't want anyone to think I was backing Romney just because I predicted him to win. It was the "little voice" in my head that said, "There is your next president", the first time I heard him speaking on TV.

Democrats Seek Records on Romney, Others Posted by WVNan to TruthNtegrity On News/Activism 12/30/2005 2:32:54 PM EST • 18 of 24 Prediction: If Mitt Romney runs and there is no "major" scandal, he will win the presidency.

10 posted on 01/22/2008 7:01:53 PM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

22 posted on 01/22/2008 7:25:03 PM PST by GOP_Lady (I'm a MITTen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

DailyPaul is reporting that Paul is winning in the delegates.


27 posted on 01/22/2008 7:29:25 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

In 1996, it was called a caucus but it was more like a primary. However there were a limited number of polling locations — I guess maybe they were run by the party rather than the state. However there were very long lines — Gramm was thought to be the most popular, but it was the Buchanan supporters that were willing to wait 5 hours to vote. I admit I wasn’t among the willing.


37 posted on 01/22/2008 7:37:29 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
The MSM's dismissing of supposedly "uncontested" races is remarkably stupid.

Did they never pause to think why these races are uncontested? Hmmm? Could it be that no one decided to compete with Mitt in states like Louisiana, Nevada, and Wyoming because no one thought they had a chance?

The fact Mitt's opponents are choosing not to compete with him in so many states says a lot about his strength as a national candidate.

Too bad reporters are too stupid to realize this.

38 posted on 01/22/2008 7:37:40 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

I’ve personally been an agnostic, then a fundie and I married a Catholic and eventually decided to join the Catholic Church. I’m not as faithful as I’d like to be or ought to be. From where I’m standing I think both flavors of Christianity view Mormonism as a cult. I don’t mean to hurt anyones feelings but that’s the way I see it.

http://www.catholic.com/library/Mormon_Stumpers.asp


43 posted on 01/22/2008 7:44:55 PM PST by ToryNotion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque; redgirlinabluestate
I've just returned from the Louisiana Caucus in Baton Rouge where I was running as a Mitt Romney delegate. Here are my first impressions.

Three campaigns had a presence. They were the Ron Paul campaign, the Mitt Romney campaign, and the John McCain campaign. In addition, a group calling itself "Pro-Life, Pro-family" was supporting a slate of delegates.

Of these groups, Ron Paul's campaign had the most visible presence. People with Ron Paul T-shirts, signs, and buttons were everywhere. Many of them were college students, but I saw a good mix of Ron Paul supporters of every age. Some dressed very casually as young people tend to do, and others looked more conventional. Ron Paul was in Louisiana on Monday, and visiting the state allowed him to mobilize his people.

John McCain's people weren't quite as visible in the crowd. The McCain stickers and buttons weren't as obvious. They seemed to be an older group of people. However, no voter could approach the building without being offered a card with the John McCain slate at least once. Many of the people coming to vote were obviously John McCain supporters. They had their card with the McCain slate, and they weren't interested in receiving a card from any other candidate. John McCain has received some high profile endorsements in the state, and those endorsements will carry some votes.

Our group was a pretty nice mixture. We had a couple of kids who walked around the parking lot with Mitt Romney signs. We had a good mix of ages in our supporters. Some people came to the caucus looking for one of us to provide the list of Romney delegate candidates, and others were less sure but at least willing to listen.

The "Pro-Life, Pro-Family" group also had a good representation. Quite a few people passing me had the pro-life list and were not really interested in looking at another list.

Some of the people on the ballot are fixtures in the Baton Rouge Republican community. One man running in my district was the GOP candidate for U.S. Senate in 1996, and he barely lost that race. Many people thought that Mary Landrieu won only through fraud. I believe he's uncommitted to any candidate at this time, but I'm certain that he'll win one of the 15 delegate positions from our district. Another man has run for several statewide offices and may have even held one of those offices recently. He was on the Mitt Romney slate as well as being on the pro-life slate. I'm certain that he'll win one of the positions. A few others seem to be big names in the local GOP community, so I'm sure they'll win as well.

Beyond those people, I couldn't tell who had the best turnout. I won't be surprised to see the Ron Paul people win most of the positions in the 6th District. Of the 15 positions in the 6th district, we may end up with three or four supporting Mitt Romney, four or five supporting John McCain, four or five supporting Ron Paul, and a few uncommitted delegates. Maybe we'll do better even better, but I can't report an easy win for us tonight. I will be very surprised if I'm one of the Mitt Romney supporters who wins.

Overall, people were nice. A few of the Ron Paul supporters were hard core and did a little shouting. Most of them were young people who were fun. As the incoming voters slowed, I spent some time talking to a few of them. I've been an official volunteer on a Ron Paul congressional campaign, so they couldn't say that I was someone who didn't understand and never listened to Dr. Paul. Overall, they were a good group. I also enjoyed talking to other Mitt Romney supporters. I've not done any live campaigning with the Romney people, and this event was fun.

Bill

44 posted on 01/22/2008 7:45:24 PM PST by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Ron Paul’s supporters seem to have organized pretty well for the ‘uncontested’ Louisiana caucuses.


47 posted on 01/22/2008 7:46:44 PM PST by ToryNotion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

My money’s on Romney, now. With Thompson gone, he’s our last hope.

And despite what everyone thinks, I think he’d obliterate Clinton in a debate. As long as he remembers the fundamentals of conservatism, and how it ‘works every time its tried’, including against the principles of liberalism in a debate.


56 posted on 01/22/2008 7:56:37 PM PST by WiseGuyF686
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Isn't Louisiana in the South? I thought Romney couldn't win there.
66 posted on 01/22/2008 8:03:27 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Tonight? What the heck is wrong withour media that I am hearing about this caucus now??????


77 posted on 01/22/2008 8:17:28 PM PST by cookcounty (Ja-pan Jack Murtha, The ex-Marine who thinks Okinawa is on his Middle East map.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Good for Mitt, each win makes a McInsane or Tootsie Presidency more difficult.


132 posted on 01/23/2008 7:27:42 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

It is my hope that Romney will smash Huckabee and McCain like the bugs they are.


139 posted on 01/23/2008 3:04:37 PM PST by Gator113 (My short list..Fred, Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson